Literature DB >> 26789707

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection Update: U.S. Government Takes Steps to Promote Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection Through Meaningful Use Guidelines.

Sean Cahill1,2, Harvey J Makadon1,3.   

Abstract

Collecting data on sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) in healthcare settings and in electronic health records (EHRs) is essential to understanding, addressing, and reducing LGBT health disparities. The federal government took two key steps in early 2014 in support of asking SO/GI questions in clinical settings as part of the meaningful use of EHRs. First, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology issued proposed 2015 Edition Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT) Criteria, which suggest Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) code sets for SO/GI data collection in 2017. To facilitate the effective and accurate collection of SO/GI data, 153 LGBT and HIV groups recommended that the national coordinator request that the National Library of Medicine develop new codes to reflect SO/GI data. Second, the Health Information Technology Policy Committee submitted recommendations to the national coordinator, including the recommendation that "CEHRT [certified EHR technology] provides the functionality to capture … sexual orientation, gender identity." If the national coordinator accepts this recommendation, it will be put up for public comment in fall 2014 along with other Stage 3 proposed rules. Also, the 2017 Edition CEHRT Notice of Proposed Rule Making Criteria will be up for comment in fall 2014. Final Stage 3 Meaningful Use Guidelines will be published in summer 2015, and other key steps will take place into 2017. A critical parallel step is the training of clinical staff on LGBT health disparities and how to use SO/GI data and manage them in ways that meet the clinical needs of LGBT patients and protect confidentiality and privacy. We must also educate LGBT community members about why offering this information is important for their health and how collecting SO/GI data in EHRs is an important step to understanding LGBT health, reducing disparities, and improving outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data collection; electronic health records; gender identity; health disparities; health information technology; meaningful use; sexual orientation

Year:  2014        PMID: 26789707     DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2014.0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  LGBT Health        ISSN: 2325-8292            Impact factor:   4.151


  14 in total

1.  Electronic health records and transgender patients--practical recommendations for the collection of gender identity data.

Authors:  Madeline B Deutsch; David Buchholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Suicides Among Lesbian and Gay Male Individuals: Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System.

Authors:  Bridget H Lyons; Mikel L Walters; Shane P D Jack; Emiko Petrosky; Janet M Blair; Asha Z Ivey-Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  National Survey of Oncologists at National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Practice Behaviors About LGBTQ Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Catherine A Blackburn; Megan E Sutter; Peter A Kanetsky; Susan T Vadaparampil; Vani N Simmons; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The importance of disclosure: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, queer/questioning, and intersex individuals and the cancer continuum.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Matthew B Schabath; Julian A Sanchez; Steven K Sutton; B Lee Green
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Differences in Healthcare Access, Use, and Experiences Within a Community Sample of Racially Diverse Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Questioning Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Kathryn Macapagal; Ramona Bhatia; George J Greene
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.151

6.  Missing data in substance abuse research? Researchers' reporting practices of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Authors:  Annesa Flentje; Cristina L Bacca; Bryan N Cochran
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Emergency Department Query for Patient-Centered Approaches to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity : The EQUALITY Study.

Authors:  Adil H Haider; Eric B Schneider; Lisa M Kodadek; Rachel R Adler; Anju Ranjit; Maya Torain; Ryan Y Shields; Claire Snyder; Jeremiah D Schuur; Laura Vail; Danielle German; Susan Peterson; Brandyn D Lau
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  The Opportunity for Medical Systems to Reduce Health Disparities Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex Patients.

Authors:  Cameron Donald; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  The Utility of the Two-Step Gender Measure Within Trans and Cis Populations.

Authors:  Emilia Lombardi; Swagata Banik
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2016-02-18

10.  Transgender Women in Clinical Trials of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Robert M Grant; Jae M Sevelius; Juan V Guanira; Jana Villayzan Aguilar; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Madeline B Deutsch
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.