| Literature DB >> 26788498 |
Jiantao Li1, Hao Zhang2, Peng Yin3, Xiuyun Su4, Zhe Zhao5, Jianfeng Zhou1, Chen Li6, Zhirui Li1, Lihai Zhang1, Peifu Tang1.
Abstract
We established a novel measurement technique to evaluate the anatomic information of nutrient artery canals using Mimics (Materialise's Interactive Medical Image Control System) software, which will provide full knowledge of nutrient artery canals to assist in the diagnosis of longitudinal fractures of tibia and choosing an optimal therapy. Here we collected Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format of 199 patients hospitalized in our hospital. All three-dimensional models of tibia in Mimics were reconstructed. In 3-matic software, we marked five points in tibia which located at intercondylar eminence, tibia tuberosity, outer ostium, inner ostium, and bottom of medial malleolus. We then recorded Z-coordinates values of the five points and performed statistical analysis. Our results indicate that foramen was found to be absent in 9 (2.3%) tibias, and 379 (95.2%) tibias had single nutrient foramen. The double foramina was observed in 10 (2.5%) tibias. The mean of tibia length was 358 ± 22 mm. The mean foraminal index was 31.8% ± 3%. The mean distance between tibial tuberosity and foramen (TFD) is 66 ± 12 mm. Foraminal index has significant positive correlation with TFD (r = 0.721, P < 0.01). Length of nutrient artery canals has significant negative correlation with TFD (r = -0.340, P < 0.01) and has significant negative correlation with foraminal index (r = -0.541, P < 0.01).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26788498 PMCID: PMC4692976 DOI: 10.1155/2015/171672
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Nutrient canal showed in the axial and sagittal images (a–f) from proximal to distal. (a and b) The ostium of nutrient artery canal on the outer cortex (orange arrows), (c and d) the course through the cortex (white arrows), and (e and f) the inner ostium (black arrows).
Figure 2Determination of the outer ostium and inner ostium.
Figure 3The mark of the points of tibia tuberosity, the outer ostium, and inner ostium. The left picture of the two bones is from anterior viewing, and the right is from posterior viewing.
Figure 4Under 3-matic software, we rotated the tibia to the standard position.
| Number of nutrient foramina | Tibia number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Left side | Right side | Total | |
| 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 (2.26%) |
| 1 | 188 | 191 | 379 (95.23%) |
| 2 | 8 | 2 | 10 (2.51%) |
| Total | 199 | 199 | 398 (100%) |
| Number of nutrient foramina | Tibia number | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Total | |
| 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| 1 | 263 | 116 | 379 |
| 2 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
| Total | 270 | 128 | 398 |
| Distribution of double nutrient foramina | ||
|---|---|---|
| Left side | Right side | Total |
| One | Two | 7 (male) |
| Two | One | 1 (female) |
| Two | Two | 1 (female) |
| Tibia with one foramen | Tibia with two foramina | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary foramen | Vice foramen | ||
| Foraminal index | 30.3% ± 2% | 30.1% ± 3% | 28.2% ± 7% |
| Length of nutrient artery canals | 51 ± 9 | 41 ± 10 | 26 ± 11 |
| TFD | 66 ± 12 | 66 ± 15 | 60 ± 29 |