Literature DB >> 26788061

Isolation of Bacillus sphaericus from Lombok Island, Indonesia, and Their Toxicity against Anopheles aconitus.

Bambang Fajar Suryadi1, Bagyo Yanuwiadi2, Tri Ardyati2.   

Abstract

Malaria is endemic to Lombok Island, Indonesia. One approach to suppress malaria spread is to eliminate anopheline larvae in their habitat and the environmentally safe agent is bacteria, that is, Bacillus sphaericus. However, there is no information regarding local isolate of B. sphaericus that is toxic to mosquito larvae from Lombok. The aims of the study were to isolate B. sphaericus from soil in areas close to beach surrounding Lombok Island and to test their toxicity against 3rd instar Anopheles aconitus larvae. Soil samples were collected from 20 different sampling locations from Lombok Island and homogenized with sterile physiological salt solution. Suspension was heat-shocked at 80°C for 30 minutes and then spread onto antibiotic-supplemented NYSM solid medium. Colonies grown were characterized and subjected to initial toxicity test against anopheline larvae. Isolates with more than 50% killing percentage were subjected to bioassay testing against anopheline larvae. From 20 locations, 1 isolate showed mild toxicity (namely, isolate MNT) and 2 isolates showed high toxicity (namely, isolates SLG and TJL2) against An. aconitus. Those 3 isolates were potentially useful isolates, as they killed almost all larvae in 24 hours. The discovery of toxic indigenous isolates of B. sphaericus from Lombok Island opens opportunity to develop a biopesticide from local resources.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26788061      PMCID: PMC4691609          DOI: 10.1155/2015/854709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Microbiol


1. Introduction

Lombok Island is one island in West Nusa Tenggara Province of Indonesia. One of common infectious diseases on Lombok is malaria. It is predicted that at minimum 13,000 people are suffering from the disease [1]. Malaria is caused by a protozoa called Plasmodium and spreads among humans by bites from anopheline mosquitoes. One species that has been identified as a malarial vector on Lombok is Anopheles aconitus. The species lives at locations ranging from sea level to 600–800 m above sea level. The larvae of An. aconitus can be found on rice fields (planted and unplanted), various shallow pools (rock, stream, and flood), and slow moving streams with grassy margins [2]. Mosquito control is the primary method used to suppress the spread of malaria. This is commonly done in 3 ways: mosquito larvae control (using larvicide), adult mosquito control (using adulticide), and breeding habitat modification [3]. The most effective approach is mosquito larvae control and this can be accomplished in several ways. One safe agent for controlling anopheline larvae is bacteria called Bacillus sphaericus [4]. The use of indigenous B. sphaericus is highly desirable as it would build a local capability to produce a biopesticide in developing countries. The capability would suppress dependency on imported product and accelerate biopesticide production [5]. However, there is no information on prevalence of environmentally relevant B. sphaericus on Lombok nor its potential to be used as a biopesticide. Therefore, studies to reveal indigenous isolate of B. sphaericus are important to the island from both a public health and economic perspectives. In this study, isolates of B. sphaericus were taken from some areas close to beach area and villages known to be endemic to malaria. The isolates were tested against An. aconitus larvae that is widely found on the island.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Soil Collection

Collection was done at 20 different locations close to beach area surrounding Lombok Island, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Five hundred grams of soil was collected from each chosen point compositely and stored in sterile screw-capped container. The chosen areas were close to village and/or river opening/estuaries presumably an appropriate location for anopheline breeding habitat.

2.2. Bacterial Isolation

Soil samples were homogenized with sterile physiological salt solution forming 10% w/v suspension. The suspension was heated to 80°C for 30 minutes and then serially diluted with sterile physiological saline solution (in 10−1 to 10−5 dilutions). Diluted suspension was spread on NYSM (nutrient agar enriched with 0.5 g/L yeast extract, 0.2 g/L MgCl2, 0.01 g/L MnCl2, and 0.1 g/L CaCl2) plating medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL streptomycin to avoid unwanted bacteria growth [6]. Incubation was done at 30°C for 2 × 24 hours. Colonies that showed Gram positive rod with bulging endospore on the terminal end were purified for detailed characterization and toxicity testing. Putative B. sphaericus isolates were further characterized using key biochemical/physiological tests such as catalase, oxidase, nitrate reduction, urease, sugar utilization, starch hydrolysis, and antibiotic sensitivity test [7].

2.3. Larvae Preparation

Anopheline eggs came from mosquitoes reared intensively in rearing facility at IVRCRD (Institute for Vector and Reservoir Control Research and Development), Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia. Anopheline eggs were submerged into well water (nontreated water) to hatch them. Larvae resulting from hatched eggs were reared for 6 days to reach 3rd instar stadium (3-4 mm in length).

2.4. Initial Toxicity Testing

This testing is done to observe toxicity potential of all B. sphaericus isolates. The procedure was described by Dulmage et al. [8]. The B. sphaericus isolates were grown in NYSM liquid medium at 30°C for 72 hours with 170 rpm shaking. Sixty anopheline larvae (60 larvae in 3 containers) were put into 10% v/v isolated B. sphaericus grown on the NYSM liquid medium. Larva death on each test replication was observed and mean value of larva death was calculated. The test was also done with B. sphaericus 2362 for comparison.

2.5. Bioassay

In order to obtain LC (lethal concentration) value, bioassay was done on isolates that showed more than 50% toxicity on initial toxicity testing. As mention by Dulmage et al. [8], seven concentrations (in 10-fold concentration differences with 3 replications) of chosen isolated B. sphaericus grown in 3 × 24-hour NYSM liquid medium were prepared (totally there were 21 testing containers). Four hundred and twenty An. aconitus larvae were distributed evenly in the container (20 larvae for each testing container). Sixty An. aconitus larvae in 3 containers (20 larvae per testing container) were mixed with 10% v/v culture medium (without bacteria) as negative control and other 60 An. aconitus larvae were mixed with culture of B. sphaericus 2362 as positive control. Mortality rate of anopheline larvae was calculated using this formula:If in the negative control group 5–20% dead larva are found, Abbott's correction formula [9] is used to obtain corrected mortality rate:Lethal concentration (LC) values in 24 and 48 hours were calculated using Probit analysis [10] applying software Minitab V16 for Windows.

3. Results and Discussion

The use of B. sphaericus as a biocontrol agent to suppress anopheline larvae has been done intensively in some countries, such as United States, some European countries, and China. It is primarily used at standing waters, swamps/marshland, paddy fields, and lake shores that are known as primary mosquito breeding habitats [11-13]. In this study 20 isolates of B. sphaericus (and their toxicity attributes) were found at 20 locations close to beach area around Lombok Island Indonesia as presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Sampling location of B. sphaericus around Lombok Island (Indonesia) and their toxicity attributes ((−): nontoxic; (+): toxic).

Morphology characteristics of B. sphaericus isolated from Lombok Island are presented in Figure 2 and their characteristics are presented on Table 1.
Figure 2

Morphology of colony (a) and cell (b) of B. sphaericus from Lombok Island in NYSM agar medium on 3 × 24-hour incubation.

Table 1

Characteristics of B. sphaericus isolated from Lombok Island.

CharacteristicsResults/isolatedStandard
Cell
 FormRodRod
 Gram reactionPositive Positive
 Size (L × W)3.0–5.0 × 0.5–0.75 μm1.5–5.0 × 0.6–1.0 μm
 EndosporePositivePositive
 Endospore positionTerminalTerminal/subterminal
 Bulging endosporangiumPositivePositive
Morphology
 FormRoundRound
 MarginEntireEntire
 SurfaceFlat and smoothFlat and smooth
 ColorWhite-creamOpaque (grown on nutrient agar)
Biochemical and physiological
 Catalase PositivePositive
 Starch hydrolysisNegative Negative
 Acid production from sugarNegativeNegative
 Nitrate reductionNegativeNegative
 Urease PositivePositive
 OxidasePositivePositive
 AerobicityAerobeAerobe
 Sensitivity to streptomycinResistantResistant
 Sensitivity to chloramphenicolSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to penicillinSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to tetracyclineSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to amoxicillinSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to vancomycinSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to erythromycinSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to gentamicinSensitiveSensitive
 Sensitivity to ciprofloxacinSensitiveSensitive
The characteristics of putative B. sphaericus isolates were in agreement with standard characteristics mentioned in Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [7]. We have found that all these isolates could be not collected from area exposed to sea water directly (in form of rip-tide or salt dam/pool). B. sphaericus isolates were isolated from sand/soil covered/shaded with leaves and rich of organic matter (grass, fallen leaves, branches, etc.). Some locations formed small puddles, while other locations were dry and/or moist soil. From 20 locations explored, medium and highly toxic B. sphaericus was obtained only from 3 locations. Compared to other locations, these 3 locations were areas that formed small puddles that were rich in organic matter, shaded from the sun, undisturbed by human activity, and inhabited by mosquito larvae, whereas other locations were dry or moist areas (and no mosquito larvae was found). However, the latter were also rich in organic matter, shaded, and untouched. These locations were in accordance with the first discovery of B. thuringiensis in Israel Nagev Dessert [14] and discovery of B. sphaericus in the United States [15]. Those reports had similarities that those entomopathogenic bacteria were isolated from small puddle inhabited by mosquito larvae. Soil is potential habitat for Bacillus, as soil provides nutrients and growing factors for the bacteria. However, in this study richness in organic matter did not make a given area a suitable habitat for toxic B. sphaericus. It was seen that, from 20 locations explored, there were 10 locations that gave nontoxic B. sphaericus isolates, 7 locations that gave lowly toxic B. sphaericus isolates, and only 3 locations that gave very toxic B. sphaericus isolates. We suggest that richness in organic matter is not main factor for obtaining such toxic B. sphaericus isolates. Contact with mosquito larvae should be taken into consideration and it was shown in some report in early discovery of entomopathogenic bacteria [14, 15]. LC50 and LC90 values in 24 and 48 hours of three B. sphaericus isolates based on cell concentration (cell/mL) are shown in Table 2. Isolate MNT showed higher LC values compared to B. sphaericus 2362 as standard. Isolates SLG and TJL2 showed LC values that were close to those of B. sphaericus 2362. LC (lethal concentration) value informs us how low the concentration or the dilution of certain microbe or ingredient able to kill targeted organism is. From these values it can be concluded that B. sphaericus isolate MNT was of lower toxicity than B. sphaericus 2362, whereas B. sphaericus isolates SLG and TJL2 had LC values that were almost similar to toxicity of B. sphaericus 2362.
Table 2

LC value of B. sphaericus isolated from Lombok Island against An. aconitus and its comparison with B. sphaericus 2362.

IsolatesLC values (cell/mL)
LC50-24 hrs LC90-24 hrs LC50-48 hrs LC90-48 hrs
B. sphaericus isolate MNT1.28 × 108 1.76 × 107 1.98 × 108 4.57 × 107
B. sphaericus isolate SLG1.51 × 107 3.69 × 106 2.54 × 105 5.45 × 105
B. sphaericus isolate TJL21.12 × 106 4.33 × 106 1.01 × 105 4.25 × 105
B. sphaericus 2362 (standard)1.52 × 106 1.34 × 105 5.64 × 106 5.88 × 105
These B. sphaericus isolates were the first toxic B. sphaericus isolated from Lombok Island, Indonesia. Other entomopathogenic bacterium that was isolated and tested was B. thuringiensis that came from some areas in Indonesia. B. thuringiensis' susceptible targets are larvae Aedes and Culex. Anopheles is the least susceptible to this bacterium. In contrast, B. sphaericus' susceptible targets are Culex and Anopheles, whereas Aedes is the least susceptible. The toxicity and LC value of this new isolated B. sphaericus suggest that it would be good candidate for local biocontrol agent on Lombok Island. B. sphaericus can kill mosquito larvae because of toxin activities it harbors. There are 2 kinds of toxins: binary toxins/Bin (51 and 42 kDa) are produced on sporulating stage and mosquitocidal toxins/Btx (100, 32 and 36 kDa) are produced on vegetative stage [16, 17]. The binary toxins which are the most potent toxins can interact with receptor along larvae midgut specifically, whereas the mosquitocidal toxins are weaker toxins that will kill the larvae in longer period or will not kill at all (just weaken the larvae) [18]. The activities of the toxins cause nervous and muscle system collapse of the larvae. The larvae will lose its ability to move and consequently undergo asphyxia by drowning [19]. The existence of the toxins varies. Some strains may have both toxins; others may have only one or none. That explains varied killing capability among strains of B. sphaericus worldwide [20]. From its low toxicity and higher LC values (compared to B. sphaericus 2362), we predict that isolate MNT may only have binary toxins, while other 2 isolates may have binary toxin and mosquitocidal toxin altogether. Compared to other biocontrol bacteria such as B. thuringiensis, B. sphaericus will last longer in environment (some study reported 20–30 days after application) [21]. Also, B. sphaericus is still effective in killing mosquito larvae on polluted waters [22]. These reasons make B. sphaericus a popular biocontrol agent in some countries. Even though many B. sphaericus strains from any places in the world have been collected, the existence of indigenous isolates is still important to study, as it will open opportunity to develop local-strain-based biopesticide production in developing countries such as Indonesia. This capability will suppress cost used for importing commercial biopesticide from other countries and also promote local biopesticide industry as well.

4. Conclusion

Twenty local isolates of B. sphaericus were found from 20 locations close to beach area on Lombok Island with varied toxicity against anopheline larvae. Isolate MNT was mildly toxic against An. aconitus larvae, while isolates SLG and TJL2 were highly toxic against An. aconitus.
  11 in total

1.  Selective Medium for Mosquito-Pathogenic Strains of Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  A A Yousten; S B Fretz; S A Jelley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis.

Authors:  Marianne E Sinka; Michael J Bangs; Sylvie Manguin; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Anand P Patil; William H Temperley; Peter W Gething; Iqbal R F Elyazar; Caroline W Kabaria; Ralph E Harbach; Simon I Hay
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Sequence analysis of the mosquitocidal toxin genes encoding 51.4- and 41.9-kilodalton proteins from Bacillus sphaericus 2362 and 2297.

Authors:  L Baumann; A H Broadwell; P Baumann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. 1925.

Authors:  W S Abbott
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the Bacillus sphaericus 1593M gene encoding a 51.4 kD polypeptide which acts synergistically with the 42 kD protein for expression of the larvicidal toxin.

Authors:  C Arapinis; F de la Torre; J Szulmajster
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Bacillus sphaericus Neide as a pathogen of mosquitoes.

Authors:  W R Kellen; T B Clark; J E Lindegren; B C Ho; M H Rogoff; S Singer
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Field trials of VectoLex CG, a Bacillus sphaericus larvicide, in Illinois waste tires and catch basins.

Authors:  J P Siegel; R J Novak
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Distribution and characterization of mosquitocidal toxin genes in some strains of Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  F G Priest; L Ebdrup; V Zahner; P E Carter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Fate of Bacillus sphaericus 1593 and 2362 spores used as larvicides in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  E W Davidson; M Urbina; J Payne; M S Mulla; H Darwazeh; H T Dulmage; J A Correa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evaluation of three microbial formulations against Culex pipiens pipiens larvae in irrigation fields in Wroclaw, Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Rydzanicz; Elzbieta Lonc; Dorota Kiewra; Peter Dechant; Steven Krause; Norbert Becker
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.917

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Bacillus sphaericus exposure on Anopheles dirus's fecundity and resistance development.

Authors:  Shasha Yu; Chen Ji; Xiaobo Zhu; Jinwei Xue; Luhan Wang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Maize growth response to different Bacillus strains isolated from a salt-marshland area under salinity stress.

Authors:  Maryam Zakavi; Hossein Askari; Mohammad Shahrooei
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.260

3.  Bacillus sphaericus exposure reduced vector competence of Anopheles dirus to Plasmodium yoelii by upregulating the Imd signaling pathway.

Authors:  Shasha Yu; Pan Wang; Jie Qin; Hong Zheng; Jing Wang; Tingting Liu; Xuesen Yang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.