Literature DB >> 11679325

Various levels of cross-resistance to Bacillus sphaericus strains in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) colonies resistant to B. sphaericus strain 2362.

C Nielsen-LeRoux1, D R Rao, J R Murphy, A Carron, T R Mani, S Hamon, M S Mulla.   

Abstract

We studied the cross-resistance to three highly toxic Bacillus sphaericus strains, IAB-59 (serotype H6), IAB-881 (serotype H3), and IAB-872 (serotype H48), of four colonies of the Culex pipiens complex resistant to B. sphaericus 2362 and 1593, both of which are serotype H5a5b strains. Two field-selected highly resistant colonies originating from India (KOCHI, 17,000-fold resistance) and France (SPHAE, 23,000-fold resistance) and a highly resistant laboratory-selected colony from California (GeoR, 36,000-fold resistance) showed strong cross-resistance to strains IAB-881 and IAB-872 but significantly weaker cross-resistance to IAB-59 (3- to 43-fold resistance). In contrast, a laboratory-selected California colony with low-level resistance (JRMM-R, 5-fold resistance) displayed similar levels of resistance (5- to 10-fold) to all of the B. sphaericus strains tested. Thus, among the mosquitocidal strains of B. sphaericus we identified a strain, IAB-59, which was toxic to several Culex colonies that were highly resistant to commercial strains 2362 and 1593. Our analysis also indicated that strain IAB-59 may possess other larvicidal factors. These results could have important implications for the development of resistance management strategies for area-wide mosquito control programs based on the use of B. sphaericus preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679325      PMCID: PMC93270          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5049-5054.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  25 in total

1.  Variants of the Bacillus sphaericus binary toxins: implications for differential toxicity of strains.

Authors:  M J Humphreys; C Berry
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Cross-resistance to Bacillus sphaericus strains in Culex quinquefasciatus resistant to B. sphaericus 1593M.

Authors:  S Poopathi; T R Mani; D R Rao; G Baskaran; L Kabilan
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.267

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Control of Culex quinquefasciatus with Bacillus sphaericus in Vasco City, Goa.

Authors:  A Kumar; V P Sharma; D Thavaselvam; P K Sumodan; R H Kamat; S S Audi; B N Surve
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  [Campaign against Culex quinquefasciatus using Bacillus sphaericus: results of a pilot project in a large urban area of equatorial Africa].

Authors:  J M Hougard; R Mbentengam; L Lochouarn; H Escaffre; F Darriet; P Barbazan; D Quillévéré
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Resistance to Bacillus sphaericus involves different mechanisms in Culex pipiens (Diptera:Culicidae) larvae.

Authors:  C Nielsen-Leroux; F Pasquier; J F Charles; G Sinègre; B Gaven; N Pasteur
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Distribution and characterization of mosquitocidal toxin genes in some strains of Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  F G Priest; L Ebdrup; V Zahner; P E Carter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Binding of the 51- and 42-kDa individual components from the Bacillus sphaericus crystal toxin to mosquito larval midgut membranes from Culex and Anopheles sp. (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  J F Charles; M H Silva-Filha; C Nielsen-LeRoux; M J Humphreys; C Berry
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Efficacy of Bacillus sphaericus against the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae and other mosquitoes in swamps and rice fields in Zaire.

Authors:  S Karch; N Asidi; Z M Manzambi; J J Salaun
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.917

10.  Resistance in a laboratory population of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin is due to a change in the receptor on midgut brush-border membranes.

Authors:  C Nielsen-Leroux; J F Charles; I Thiéry; G P Georghiou
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1995-02-15
View more
  9 in total

1.  Functional Bacillus thuringiensis Cyt1Aa Is Necessary To Synergize Lysinibacillus sphaericus Binary Toxin (Bin) against Bin-Resistant and -Refractory Mosquito Species.

Authors:  Nathaly Alexandre Nascimento; Mary Carmen Torres-Quintero; Samira López Molina; Sabino Pacheco; Tatiany Patrícia Romão; Antonio Pereira-Neves; Mario Soberón; Alejandra Bravo; Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A strain of Bacillus sphaericus causes slower development of resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Guofeng Pei; Cláudia M F Oliveira; Zhiming Yuan; Christina Nielsen-LeRoux; Maria Helena Silva-Filha; Jianpin Yan; Lêda Regis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Synergistic Activity Between S-Layer Protein and Spore-Crystal Preparations from Lysinibacillus sphaericus Against Culex quinquefasciatus Larvae.

Authors:  Lucía C Lozano; Jenny Dussán
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Metal tolerance and larvicidal activity of Lysinibacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Lucía C Lozano; Jenny Dussán
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Improving the insecticidal activity against resistant Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes by expression of chitinase gene chiAC in Bacillus sphaericus.

Authors:  Yajun Cai; Jianpin Yan; Xiaomin Hu; Bei Han; Zhiming Yuan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Isolation of Bacillus sphaericus from Lombok Island, Indonesia, and Their Toxicity against Anopheles aconitus.

Authors:  Bambang Fajar Suryadi; Bagyo Yanuwiadi; Tri Ardyati
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-14

7.  A differential transcriptional profile by Culex quinquefasciatus larvae resistant to Lysinibacillus sphaericus IAB59 highlights genes and pathways associated with the resistance phenotype.

Authors:  Tatiana Maria Teodoro Rezende; Antonio Mauro Rezende; Gabriel Luz Wallau; Crhisllane Rafaele Santos Vasconcelos; Osvaldo Pompílio de-Melo-Neto; Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha; Tatiany Patrícia Romão
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 8.  Bacterial Toxins Active against Mosquitoes: Mode of Action and Resistance.

Authors:  Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha; Tatiany Patricia Romão; Tatiana Maria Teodoro Rezende; Karine da Silva Carvalho; Heverly Suzany Gouveia de Menezes; Nathaly Alexandre do Nascimento; Mario Soberón; Alejandra Bravo
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  A review of the vector management methods to prevent and control outbreaks of West Nile virus infection and the challenge for Europe.

Authors:  Romeo Bellini; Herve Zeller; Wim Van Bortel
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.876

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.