Literature DB >> 26787928

Sprout suppression on potato: need to look beyond CIPC for more effective and safer alternatives.

Vijay Paul1, R Ezekiel2, Rakesh Pandey3.   

Abstract

World over, potatoes are being stored at 8-12 °C (85-90 % RH). This is the most common way of long-term (up to 6 to 9 months) storage of potatoes. The benefit of storing the potatoes within the temperature range of 8-12 °C is minimum accumulation of sugars in stored potato tubers. In sub-temperate, sub-tropical and tropical countries of the world, short-term (3 to 4 months) storage of potatoes is being done by non-refrigerated traditional/on-farm methods. These short- and long-term storage methods keep the stored potatoes suitable not only for table purpose but also for processing. However, once the natural dormancy period of potato is over, the prevailing temperatures in these storage methods favour sprouting and sprout growth. Therefore, use of some sprout suppressant to check the sprout growth becomes essential under these methods of potato storage. CIPC [Isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate] is the most wide spread and commonly used sprout suppressant on potatoes. CIPC has been in use for more than 50 years and research carried out over such a long period use of CIPC has not only enhanced our understanding of its properties and chemistry but also about the production and toxicological status of its metabolites/degradation products. Today, various safety issues and concerns have surfaced primarily due to continuous and long-term use of CIPC. This review presents an appraisal on CIPC and explains the reasons for the long-time dependence on this chemical as a potato sprout suppressant. Issues like maximum residue limit and acceptable daily intake limit are being discussed for CIPC. This article brings an update on practical aspects of potato storage, residue levels of CIPC, efficacy of CIPC as sprout suppressant and health and environmental safety issues linked with CIPC and its metabolites. The aim of this article is to find possible solutions, way outs and future plans that can make the sprout suppression of potatoes safer and more risk free.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADIL; CIPC; MRL; Metabolite toxicity; Potato; Potato storage; Residue; Safety issues; Sprout suppressant

Year:  2015        PMID: 26787928      PMCID: PMC4711416          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-015-1980-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  25 in total

1.  Control of potato tuber sprouting.

Authors:  U Sonnewald
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 2.  Effects of food processing on pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables: a meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  B M Keikotlhaile; P Spanoghe; W Steurbaut
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  Residues of maleic hydrazide and chlorpropham in potato chips.

Authors:  H Nagami
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  The effect of essential oil formulations for potato sprout suppression.

Authors:  Moses S Owolabi; Labunmi Lajide; Matthew O Oladimeji; William N Setzer
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.986

Review 5.  Effect of handling and processing on pesticide residues in food- a review.

Authors:  Usha Bajwa; Kulwant Singh Sandhu
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  FDA Total Diet Study, April 1982-April 1984, dietary intakes of pesticides, selected elements, and other chemicals.

Authors:  E L Gunderson
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

7.  The sprout inhibitors chlorpropham and 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene elicit different transcriptional profiles and do not suppress growth through a prolongation of the dormant state.

Authors:  Michael A Campbell; Alyssa Gleichsner; Roxanne Alsbury; David Horvath; Jeffrey Suttle
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Study of potatoes' sprout inhibitor treatments with chlorprophame.

Authors:  S Noël; B Huyghebaert; O Pigeon; B Weickmans; O Mostade
Journal:  Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet       Date:  2002

Review 9.  Tools to study the degradation and loss of the N-phenyl carbamate chlorpropham--a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Margaret J Smith; Götz Bucher
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  The heterogeneity of sprout inhibitor application with chlorpropham.

Authors:  S Noël; B Huyghebaert; O Pigeon; B Weickmans; O Mostade
Journal:  Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci       Date:  2003
View more
  7 in total

1.  UV-C treatment on physiological response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during low temperature storage.

Authors:  Qiong Lin; Yajing Xie; Wei Liu; Jie Zhang; Shuzhen Cheng; Xinfang Xie; Wenqiang Guan; Zhidong Wang
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Changes in gene expression in potato meristems treated with the sprout suppressor 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene are dependent on tuber age and dormancy status.

Authors:  Michael A Campbell; Carley Gwin; Helen H Tai; Rachael Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A member of the TERMINAL FLOWER 1/CENTRORADIALIS gene family controls sprout growth in potato tubers.

Authors:  Wayne L Morris; M Carmen Alamar; Rosa M Lopez-Cobollo; Javier Castillo Cañete; Mark Bennett; Jeroen Van der Kaay; Jennifer Stevens; Sanjeev Kumar Sharma; Karen McLean; Andrew J Thompson; Leon A Terry; Colin G N Turnbull; Glenn J Bryan; Mark A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  The Cysteine-Rich Peptide Snakin-2 Negatively Regulates Tubers Sprouting through Modulating Lignin Biosynthesis and H2O2 Accumulation in Potato.

Authors:  Mengsheng Deng; Jie Peng; Jie Zhang; Shuang Ran; Chengcheng Cai; Liping Yu; Su Ni; Xueli Huang; Liqin Li; Xiyao Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Maleic and L-tartaric acids as new anti-sprouting agents for potatoes during storage in comparison to other efficient sprout suppressants.

Authors:  Ekta Bhattacharya; Suparna Mandal Biswas; Panchanan Pramanik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Maternal periconceptional consumption of sprouted potato and risks of neural tube defects and orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Wenli Ni; Tian Tian; Le Zhang; Zhiwen Li; Linlin Wang; Aiguo Ren
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Combining conventional QTL analysis and whole-exome capture-based bulk-segregant analysis provides new genetic insights into tuber sprout elongation and dormancy release in a diploid potato population.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Sharma; Karen McLean; Richard J Colgan; Debbie Rees; Stephen Young; Mads Sønderkær; Leon A Terry; Colin Turnbull; Mark A Taylor; Glenn J Bryan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.821

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.