Literature DB >> 26787770

The search for person-related information in general practice: a qualitative study.

Diego Schrans1, Dirk Avonts2, Thierry Christiaens2, Sara Willems2, Kaat de Smet2, Kees van Boven3, Pauline Boeckxstaens2, Thomas Kühlein4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practice is person-focused. Contextual information influences the clinical decision-making process in primary care. Currently, person-related information (PeRI) is neither recorded in a systematic way nor coded in the electronic medical record (EMR), and therefore not usable for scientific use. AIM: To search for classes of PeRI influencing the process of care.
METHODS: GPs, from nine countries worldwide, were asked to write down narrative case histories where personal factors played a role in decision-making. In an inductive process, the case histories were consecutively coded according to classes of PeRI. The classes found were deductively applied to the following cases and refined, until saturation was reached. Then, the classes were grouped into code-families and further clustered into domains.
RESULTS: The inductive analysis of 32 case histories resulted in 33 defined PeRI codes, classifying all personal-related information in the cases. The 33 codes were grouped in the following seven mutually exclusive code-families: 'aspects between patient and formal care provider', 'social environment and family', 'functioning/behaviour', 'life history/non-medical experiences', 'personal medical information', 'socio-demographics' and 'work-/employment-related information'. The code-families were clustered into four domains: 'social environment and extended family', 'medicine', 'individual' and 'work and employment'.
CONCLUSION: As PeRI is used in the process of decision-making, it should be part of the EMR. The PeRI classes we identified might form the basis of a new contextual classification mainly for research purposes. This might help to create evidence of the person-centredness of general practice.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; electronic health records; general practice; illness behaviour; patient-centred care; quality of health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787770     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmv099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  2 in total

1.  A systematic review of reasons for and against asking patients about their socioeconomic contexts.

Authors:  Andrew Moscrop; Sue Ziebland; Nia Roberts; Andrew Papanikitas
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-07-23

2.  Development, dissemination, and applications of a new terminological resource, the Q-Code taxonomy for professional aspects of general practice/family medicine.

Authors:  Marc Jamoulle; Melissa Resnick; Julien Grosjean; Ashwin Ittoo; Elena Cardillo; Robert Vander Stichele; Stefan Darmoni; Marc Vanmeerbeek
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.904

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.