Junichi Shindoh1,2, Yujiro Nishioka3,4, Ryuji Yoshioka4, Toshitaka Sugawara3, Yoshihiro Sakamoto4, Kiyoshi Hasegawa4, Masaji Hashimoto3, Norihiro Kokudo5. 1. Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic, Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. shindou-tky@umin.ac.jp. 2. Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Disease, Tokyo, Japan. shindou-tky@umin.ac.jp. 3. Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic, Surgery Division, Department of Digestive Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. KOKUDO-2SU@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The KRAS mutation status is reportedly correlated with poor survival outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, its true prognostic impact and the reason for the poor prognosis remain unclear. METHODS: Data on 163 patients with a known KRAS mutation status who underwent curative resection for CLM were retrospectively reviewed. The long-term survival and site-specific incidence of recurrence were then compared between patients with a KRAS mutation (mtKRAS) and those without a mutation (wtKRAS). RESULTS: The mtKRAS group had a poorer 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (59.8 vs. 83.6 %, p = 0.016), 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (0 vs. 20.2 %, p = 0.069), and median time to surgical failure (TSF) [18.8 vs. 39.7 months, p = 0.001] than the wtKRAS group. The cumulative incidences of liver recurrence and lung recurrence at 3 years were also higher in the mtKRAS group (76.2 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.060; and 71.9 vs. 37.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis confirmed that an mtKRAS status had a significant effect on the DSS rate (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, p = 0.006), RFS (HR 2.0, p = 0.004), TSF (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), liver recurrence (HR 1.7, p < 0.001), and lung recurrence (HR 2.6, p < 0.001). Lung-related unresectable recurrences were more frequent (41 vs. 18 %, p = 0.048) and were associated with an earlier TSF (9.6 vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.14) in the mtKRAS group, regardless of the location of the primary lesions. CONCLUSIONS: mtKRAS is associated with poor survival outcome after CLM resection because of a relatively high incidence of lung recurrence and a relatively short TSF.
BACKGROUND: The KRAS mutation status is reportedly correlated with poor survival outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, its true prognostic impact and the reason for the poor prognosis remain unclear. METHODS: Data on 163 patients with a known KRAS mutation status who underwent curative resection for CLM were retrospectively reviewed. The long-term survival and site-specific incidence of recurrence were then compared between patients with a KRAS mutation (mtKRAS) and those without a mutation (wtKRAS). RESULTS: The mtKRAS group had a poorer 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (59.8 vs. 83.6 %, p = 0.016), 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (0 vs. 20.2 %, p = 0.069), and median time to surgical failure (TSF) [18.8 vs. 39.7 months, p = 0.001] than the wtKRAS group. The cumulative incidences of liver recurrence and lung recurrence at 3 years were also higher in the mtKRAS group (76.2 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.060; and 71.9 vs. 37.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis confirmed that an mtKRAS status had a significant effect on the DSS rate (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, p = 0.006), RFS (HR 2.0, p = 0.004), TSF (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), liver recurrence (HR 1.7, p < 0.001), and lung recurrence (HR 2.6, p < 0.001). Lung-related unresectable recurrences were more frequent (41 vs. 18 %, p = 0.048) and were associated with an earlier TSF (9.6 vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.14) in the mtKRAS group, regardless of the location of the primary lesions. CONCLUSIONS:mtKRAS is associated with poor survival outcome after CLM resection because of a relatively high incidence of lung recurrence and a relatively short TSF.
Authors: Linda M Pak; Nancy E Kemeny; Marinela Capanu; Joanne F Chou; Taryn Boucher; Andrea Cercek; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Thomas Schweiger; Sandra Liebmann-Reindl; Olaf Glueck; Patrick Starlinger; Johannes Laengle; Peter Birner; Walter Klepetko; Dietmar Pils; Berthold Streubel; Konrad Hoetzenecker Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Efsevia Vakiani; Etay Ziv; Mithat Gonen; Karen T Brown; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon; David B Solit; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-08-02