Literature DB >> 26786089

KRAS Mutation Status Predicts Site-Specific Recurrence and Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Irrespective of Location of the Primary Lesion.

Junichi Shindoh1,2, Yujiro Nishioka3,4, Ryuji Yoshioka4, Toshitaka Sugawara3, Yoshihiro Sakamoto4, Kiyoshi Hasegawa4, Masaji Hashimoto3, Norihiro Kokudo5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The KRAS mutation status is reportedly correlated with poor survival outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, its true prognostic impact and the reason for the poor prognosis remain unclear.
METHODS: Data on 163 patients with a known KRAS mutation status who underwent curative resection for CLM were retrospectively reviewed. The long-term survival and site-specific incidence of recurrence were then compared between patients with a KRAS mutation (mtKRAS) and those without a mutation (wtKRAS).
RESULTS: The mtKRAS group had a poorer 3-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (59.8 vs. 83.6 %, p = 0.016), 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (0 vs. 20.2 %, p = 0.069), and median time to surgical failure (TSF) [18.8 vs. 39.7 months, p = 0.001] than the wtKRAS group. The cumulative incidences of liver recurrence and lung recurrence at 3 years were also higher in the mtKRAS group (76.2 vs. 54.7 %, p = 0.060; and 71.9 vs. 37.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis confirmed that an mtKRAS status had a significant effect on the DSS rate (hazard ratio [HR] 2.9, p = 0.006), RFS (HR 2.0, p = 0.004), TSF (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), liver recurrence (HR 1.7, p < 0.001), and lung recurrence (HR 2.6, p < 0.001). Lung-related unresectable recurrences were more frequent (41 vs. 18 %, p = 0.048) and were associated with an earlier TSF (9.6 vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.14) in the mtKRAS group, regardless of the location of the primary lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: mtKRAS is associated with poor survival outcome after CLM resection because of a relatively high incidence of lung recurrence and a relatively short TSF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26786089     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5087-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  13 in total

1.  Prospective phase II trial of combination hepatic artery infusion and systemic chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: Long term results and curative potential.

Authors:  Linda M Pak; Nancy E Kemeny; Marinela Capanu; Joanne F Chou; Taryn Boucher; Andrea Cercek; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Mutational profile of colorectal cancer lung metastases and paired primary tumors by targeted next generation sequencing: implications on clinical outcome after surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Schweiger; Sandra Liebmann-Reindl; Olaf Glueck; Patrick Starlinger; Johannes Laengle; Peter Birner; Walter Klepetko; Dietmar Pils; Berthold Streubel; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Assessment of Overall Survival Benefits in Patients Undergoing Complete Hepatectomy for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer With Liver and Lung Metastases.

Authors:  Elsa Melissa Arvide; Jenilette Dames Velasco
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Impact of primary tumour location on colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review.

Authors:  George Bingham; Alysha Shetye; Reena Suresh; Reza Mirnezami
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24

Review 5.  The Developing Story of Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Stergios Boussios; Mehmet Akif Ozturk; Michele Moschetta; Afroditi Karathanasi; Nikolaos Zakynthinakis-Kyriakou; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-02-07

Review 6.  Implications of RAS Mutations on Oncological Outcomes of Surgical Resection and Thermal Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Rami Rhaiem; Linda Rached; Ahmad Tashkandi; Olivier Bouché; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Dynamic monitoring of circulating tumor DNA to predict prognosis and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  De-Shen Wang; Hui Yang; Xiao-Yun Liu; Zhi-Gang Chen; Yun Wang; William Pat Fong; Ming-Tao Hu; Yuan-Chao Zheng; Yun Zheng; Bin-Kui Li; Yun-Fei Yuan; Gong Chen; Zhi-Zhong Pan; Lele Song; Yu-Hong Li; Rui-Hua Xu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 8.  Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas M Diehl; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Specific KRAS amino acid substitutions and EGFR mutations predict site-specific recurrence and metastasis following non-small-cell lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Stéphane Renaud; Joseph Seitlinger; Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz; Mickaël Schaeffer; Anne-Claire Voegeli; Michèle Legrain; Michèle Beau-Faller; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Kras mutation is a marker of worse oncologic outcomes after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Efsevia Vakiani; Etay Ziv; Mithat Gonen; Karen T Brown; Nancy E Kemeny; Stephen B Solomon; David B Solit; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.