Thomas Schweiger1, Sandra Liebmann-Reindl2,3, Olaf Glueck1, Patrick Starlinger4, Johannes Laengle4, Peter Birner3, Walter Klepetko1, Dietmar Pils4,5, Berthold Streubel2,3, Konrad Hoetzenecker1. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 2. Core Facility Genomics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Department of Pathology, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the selection of patients who benefit from a surgical resection is difficult. Mutational profiling has become an essential part of diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. Despite this, comprehensive data on the mutational profile of CRC and its clinical impact in the context of pulmonary metastasectomy is sparse. We therefore aimed to provide a complete mutational status of CRC pulmonary metastases (PM) and corresponding primary tumors by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and correlate sequencing data with clinical outcome variables. METHODS: Case-matched, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimens of lung metastases (n=47) and matched primary CRC (n=24) were sequenced using the TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina platform). Penalized Cox regression models were applied to identify mutations with prognostic impact. RESULTS: Mutations were found most frequently in APC, TP53 and KRAS, in both PM and matched primary tumors. Concordance between primary tumors and PM was 83.5%. Adaptive elastic-net regularized Cox regression models identified mutations being prognostic for time to pulmonary recurrence (EGFR, GNAQ, KIT, MET, and PTPN11) and for overall survival (OS) (PDGFRA, SMARCB1, and TP53). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CRC PM harbor a variety of conserved and de novo mutations. We could identify a mutational profile predicting clinical outcome after pulmonary metastasectomy. Moreover, our data provide a rationale for future targeted therapies of patients with CRC lung metastases.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy is one of the cornerstones in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the selection of patients who benefit from a surgical resection is difficult. Mutational profiling has become an essential part of diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. Despite this, comprehensive data on the mutational profile of CRC and its clinical impact in the context of pulmonary metastasectomy is sparse. We therefore aimed to provide a complete mutational status of CRC pulmonary metastases (PM) and corresponding primary tumors by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and correlate sequencing data with clinical outcome variables. METHODS: Case-matched, formalin-fixed paraffin embedded surgical specimens of lung metastases (n=47) and matched primary CRC (n=24) were sequenced using the TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (Illumina platform). Penalized Cox regression models were applied to identify mutations with prognostic impact. RESULTS: Mutations were found most frequently in APC, TP53 and KRAS, in both PM and matched primary tumors. Concordance between primary tumors and PM was 83.5%. Adaptive elastic-net regularized Cox regression models identified mutations being prognostic for time to pulmonary recurrence (EGFR, GNAQ, KIT, MET, and PTPN11) and for overall survival (OS) (PDGFRA, SMARCB1, and TP53). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that CRC PM harbor a variety of conserved and de novo mutations. We could identify a mutational profile predicting clinical outcome after pulmonary metastasectomy. Moreover, our data provide a rationale for future targeted therapies of patients with CRC lung metastases.
Authors: Y Yang; A Forslund; H Remotti; C Lönnroth; M Andersson; H Brevinge; E Svanberg; P Lindnér; L Hafström; P Naredi; K Lundholm Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jeanne Tie; Lara Lipton; Jayesh Desai; Peter Gibbs; Robert N Jorissen; Michael Christie; Katharine J Drummond; Benjamin N J Thomson; Valery Usatoff; Peter M Evans; Adrian W Pick; Simon Knight; Peter W G Carne; Roger Berry; Adrian Polglase; Paul McMurrick; Qi Zhao; Dana Busam; Robert L Strausberg; Enric Domingo; Ian P M Tomlinson; Rachel Midgley; David Kerr; Oliver M Sieber Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas Schweiger; Balazs Hegedüs; Christoph Nikolowsky; Zita Hegedüs; Ildiko Szirtes; Roland Mair; Peter Birner; Balazs Döme; György Lang; Walter Klepetko; Hendrik Jan Ankersmit; Konrad Hoetzenecker Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Thomas C Wehler; Kirsten Frerichs; Claudine Graf; Daniel Drescher; Katrin Schimanski; Stefan Biesterfeld; Martin R Berger; Stephan Kanzler; Theodor Junginger; Peter R Galle; Markus Moehler; Ines Gockel; Carl C Schimanski Journal: Oncol Rep Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: S G Larsen; M A Goscinski; S Dueland; S E Steigen; E Hofsli; A Torgunrud; M Lund-Iversen; V J Dagenborg; K Flatmark; H Sorbye Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Christina Siesing; Alexandra Petersson; Thora Ulfarsdottir; Subhayan Chattopadhyay; Björn Nodin; Jakob Eberhard; Jenny Brändstedt; Ingvar Syk; David Gisselsson; Karin Jirström Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 8.209
Authors: Yan Yan; Zhizhou Yang; Tara R Semenkovich; Benjamin D Kozower; Bryan F Meyers; Ruben G Nava; Daniel Kreisel; Varun Puri Journal: JTCVS Open Date: 2022-01-22
Authors: Jung Yoon Choi; Sunho Choi; Minhyeok Lee; Young Soo Park; Jae Sook Sung; Won Jin Chang; Ju Won Kim; Yoon Ji Choi; Jin Kim; Dong-Sik Kim; Sung-Ho Lee; Junhee Seok; Kyong Hwa Park; Seon Hahn Kim; Yeul Hong Kim Journal: Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-02-16 Impact factor: 4.679