Dan Que1, He Xiao1, Baojian Zhao2, Xu Zhang2, Qiushi Wang3, Hualiang Xiao3, Ge Wang1. 1. a Cancer Center, Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Surgery, Third Military Medical University , Chongqing , China. 2. b Beijing Epigenetics Biotechnology Co. Ltd. , Beijing , China. 3. c Department of Pathology , Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Surgery, Third Military Medical University , Chongqing , China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can effectively control non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, EGFR mutations should be detected before lung cancer patients undergo EGFR-TKI therapy. This study assessed the feasibility and predictive value of EGFR mutations in peripheral blood samples. METHODS: EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 were analyzed in tumor tissue and plasma DNA samples from 121 NSCLC patients using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and the integrated technique of mutant enriched PCR (me-PCR) and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), respectively. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were detected in 36.4% of tumor tissues and 34.7% of the plasma at a concordance rate of 85.1% (103/121). The sensitivity and specificity of plasma EGFR mutations were 77.3% and 89.6%, respectively. The gender and tumor histology of patients served as independent predictors of EGFR mutations in both tumor tissues and plasma, while CEA level was an independent predictor of EGFR mutations in the plasma. Furthermore, EGFR-TKI treatment showed a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS) in patients harboring EGFR mutation than those that did not exhibit EGFR mutation (ORR: 69.4% versus 13.0% in tissues, P < 0.001; 64.5 % vs. 28.6% in the plasma, P = 0.006. mPFS: 10.4 months versus 4.1 months in tissues, P<0.001; 10.5 months vs. 5.2 months in the plasma, P=0.001. mOS: 25.7 months versus 8.3 months in tissues, P=0.005; 25.7 months vs. 13.5 months in the plasma, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations can be detected in the plasma using the integrated technique of me-PCR and DHPLC, which enables us to predict patient response to EGFR-TKI therapy. High serum CEA levels served as an independent predictor for plasma EGFR mutations.
OBJECTIVE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can effectively control non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, EGFR mutations should be detected before lung cancerpatients undergo EGFR-TKI therapy. This study assessed the feasibility and predictive value of EGFR mutations in peripheral blood samples. METHODS:EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 were analyzed in tumor tissue and plasma DNA samples from 121 NSCLCpatients using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) and the integrated technique of mutant enriched PCR (me-PCR) and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), respectively. RESULTS:EGFR mutations were detected in 36.4% of tumor tissues and 34.7% of the plasma at a concordance rate of 85.1% (103/121). The sensitivity and specificity of plasma EGFR mutations were 77.3% and 89.6%, respectively. The gender and tumor histology of patients served as independent predictors of EGFR mutations in both tumor tissues and plasma, while CEA level was an independent predictor of EGFR mutations in the plasma. Furthermore, EGFR-TKI treatment showed a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS) in patients harboring EGFR mutation than those that did not exhibit EGFR mutation (ORR: 69.4% versus 13.0% in tissues, P < 0.001; 64.5 % vs. 28.6% in the plasma, P = 0.006. mPFS: 10.4 months versus 4.1 months in tissues, P<0.001; 10.5 months vs. 5.2 months in the plasma, P=0.001. mOS: 25.7 months versus 8.3 months in tissues, P=0.005; 25.7 months vs. 13.5 months in the plasma, P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS:EGFR mutations can be detected in the plasma using the integrated technique of me-PCR and DHPLC, which enables us to predict patient response to EGFR-TKI therapy. High serum CEA levels served as an independent predictor for plasma EGFR mutations.
Authors: Minkyu Jung; Se Hyun Kim; Young Joo Lee; Soojung Hong; Young Ae Kang; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Sun Young Rha; Joo Hang Kim; Dae Joon Kim; Byoung Chul Cho Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Geoffrey R Oxnard; Cloud P Paweletz; Yanan Kuang; Stacy L Mach; Allison O'Connell; Melissa M Messineo; Jason J Luke; Mohit Butaney; Paul Kirschmeier; David M Jackman; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael J Overman; Janhavi Modak; Scott Kopetz; Ravi Murthy; James C Yao; Marshall E Hicks; James L Abbruzzese; Alda L Tam Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jianjun Zhang; Junya Fujimoto; Jianhua Zhang; David C Wedge; Xingzhi Song; Jiexin Zhang; Sahil Seth; Chi-Wan Chow; Yu Cao; Curtis Gumbs; Kathryn A Gold; Neda Kalhor; Latasha Little; Harshad Mahadeshwar; Cesar Moran; Alexei Protopopov; Huandong Sun; Jiabin Tang; Xifeng Wu; Yuanqing Ye; William N William; J Jack Lee; John V Heymach; Waun Ki Hong; Stephen Swisher; Ignacio I Wistuba; P Andrew Futreal Journal: Science Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Oscar Arrieta; David Saavedra-Perez; Roberto Kuri; Alejandro Aviles-Salas; Luis Martinez; Daniel Mendoza-Posada; Patricia Castillo; Alma Astorga; Enrique Guzman; Jaime De la Garza Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Maria C Schwaederlé; Sandip P Patel; Hatim Husain; Megumi Ikeda; Richard B Lanman; Kimberly C Banks; AmirAli Talasaz; Lyudmila Bazhenova; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 12.531