Wynn G Hunter1, Cecilia Z Zhang1, Ashley Hesson2, J Kelly Davis3, Christine Kirby3, Lillie D Williamson3,4, Jamison A Barnett5, Peter A Ubel1,3,6. 1. Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA (WGH, CZZ, PAU) 2. Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA (AH) 3. Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, NC, USA (JKD, CK, LDW, PAU) 4. University of Illinois, Department of Communication, Champaign, IL, USA (LDW) 5. Verilogue Incorporated, Horsham, PA, USA (JAB) 6. Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, NC, USA (PAU)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 1 in 4 Americans report difficulty paying medical bills. Cost-reducing strategies discussed during outpatient physician visits remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine how often patients and physicians discuss health care costs during outpatient visits and what strategies, if any, they discussed to lower patient out-of-pocket costs. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of dialogue from 1,755 outpatient visits in community-based practices nationwide from 2010 to 2014. The study population included 677 patients with breast cancer, 422 with depression, and 656 with rheumatoid arthritis visiting 56 oncologists, 36 psychiatrists, and 26 rheumatologists, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty percent of visits contained cost conversations (95% confidence interval [CI], 28 to 32). Forty-four percent of cost conversations involved discussion of cost-saving strategies (95% CI, 40 to 48; median duration, 68 s). We identified 4 strategies to lower costs without changing the care plan. They were, in order of overall frequency: 1) changing logistics of care, 2) facilitating co-pay assistance, 3) providing free samples, and 4) changing/adding insurance plans. We also identified 4 strategies to reduce costs by changing the care plan: 1) switching to lower-cost alternative therapy/diagnostic, 2) switching from brand name to generic, 3) changing dosage/frequency, and 4) stopping/withholding interventions. Strategies were relatively consistent across health conditions, except for switching to a lower-cost alternative (more common in breast oncology) and providing free samples (more common in depression). LIMITATION: Focus on 3 conditions with potentially high out-of-pocket costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite price opacity, physicians and patients discuss a variety of out-of-pocket cost reduction strategies during clinic visits. Almost half of cost discussions mention 1 or more cost-saving strategies, with more frequent mention of those not requiring care-plan changes.
BACKGROUND: More than 1 in 4 Americans report difficulty paying medical bills. Cost-reducing strategies discussed during outpatient physician visits remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine how often patients and physicians discuss health care costs during outpatient visits and what strategies, if any, they discussed to lower patient out-of-pocket costs. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of dialogue from 1,755 outpatient visits in community-based practices nationwide from 2010 to 2014. The study population included 677 patients with breast cancer, 422 with depression, and 656 with rheumatoid arthritis visiting 56 oncologists, 36 psychiatrists, and 26 rheumatologists, respectively. RESULTS: Thirty percent of visits contained cost conversations (95% confidence interval [CI], 28 to 32). Forty-four percent of cost conversations involved discussion of cost-saving strategies (95% CI, 40 to 48; median duration, 68 s). We identified 4 strategies to lower costs without changing the care plan. They were, in order of overall frequency: 1) changing logistics of care, 2) facilitating co-pay assistance, 3) providing free samples, and 4) changing/adding insurance plans. We also identified 4 strategies to reduce costs by changing the care plan: 1) switching to lower-cost alternative therapy/diagnostic, 2) switching from brand name to generic, 3) changing dosage/frequency, and 4) stopping/withholding interventions. Strategies were relatively consistent across health conditions, except for switching to a lower-cost alternative (more common in breast oncology) and providing free samples (more common in depression). LIMITATION: Focus on 3 conditions with potentially high out-of-pocket costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite price opacity, physicians and patients discuss a variety of out-of-pocket cost reduction strategies during clinic visits. Almost half of cost discussions mention 1 or more cost-saving strategies, with more frequent mention of those not requiring care-plan changes.
Authors: Mary Catherine Beach; David A Asch; Christopher Jepson; John C Hershey; Tara Mohr; Stacey McMorrow; Peter A Ubel Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: G Caleb Alexander; Lawrence P Casalino; Chien-Wen Tseng; Diane McFadden; David O Meltzer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Neil Steers; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Vicki Fung; John Hsu; Elaine Quiter; Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-26
Authors: Wynn G Hunter; S Yousuf Zafar; Ashley Hesson; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Jamison A Barnett; Peter A Ubel Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Gregory D Brown; Wynn G Hunter; Ashley Hesson; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Jamison A Barnett; Dmytro Byelmac; Peter A Ubel Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Matthew P Banegas; John F Dickerson; Erin E Kent; Janet S de Moor; Katherine S Virgo; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Zhiyuan Zheng; Stephanie Nutt; Loyce Pace; Alexandra Varga; Lisa Waiwaiole; Jennifer Schneider; K Robin Yabroff Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.442