Literature DB >> 23180999

Understanding patients' attitudes toward communication about the cost of cancer care.

Andrea J Bullock1, Erin W Hofstatter, Melinda L Yushak, Mary K Buss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent publications have promoted physician-patient communication on cost as a means of decreasing overall spending and minimizing patients' financial burden in oncology. No study has assessed patients' perspectives on cost communication in oncology. We sought to describe oncology patients' attitudes toward cost communication, explore potential predictors for patients' communication preferences, and assess how patients with cancer consider cost when making management decisions.
METHODS: A 31-item questionnaire was developed to measure oncology patients' communication preferences regarding the cost of cancer care, focusing on out-of-pocket costs. Items were adapted from other instruments when possible. After piloting, patients were recruited from an academic ambulatory oncology practice. Basic descriptive statistics were applied.
RESULTS: Of the 771 patients approached, 256 responded (response rate, 33%). Most (68%) preferred to know about out-of-pocket costs before treatment. A majority (59%) wanted their physician to discuss these costs with them. Although 76% reported feeling comfortable discussing cost with their physician, 74% were amenable to discussing cost with someone other than their physician. Most patients did not consider out-of-pocket costs (57%) or the health care costs of the country (61%) in their decision making, nor did they believe their physician should (55%). Patients receiving active chemotherapy were less likely to want to discuss out-of-pocket costs with their physician (P = .035).
CONCLUSION: Patients' comfort with and desire to discuss cancer costs exceed that of oncologists, suggesting a need to educate oncologists on this important topic. A patient's desire to understand treatment-associated cost does not equate with a desire for cost to influence medical decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23180999      PMCID: PMC3396830          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  18 in total

1.  Understanding patient perspectives on communication about the cost of cancer care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Erin W Hofstatter
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Cancer therapy costs influence treatment: a national survey of oncologists.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Jennifer A Palmer; Eric Nadler; Chihui Fang; Peter Ubel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  SPIKE$: a six-step protocol for delivering bad news about the cost of medical care.

Authors:  Joshua McFarlane; Jerry Riggins; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Bending the cost curve in cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot survey.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Morgan Hanger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patients' decision-making process regarding participation in phase I oncology research.

Authors:  Manish Agrawal; Christine Grady; Diane L Fairclough; Neal J Meropol; Kim Maynard; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Sonal Admane; Emily R Gallagher; Vicki A Jackson; Thomas J Lynch; Inga T Lennes; Connie M Dahlin; William F Pirl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer.

Authors:  W F Baile; R Buckman; R Lenzi; G Glober; E A Beale; A P Kudelka
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2000

9.  Conjoint analysis of a new Chemotherapy: willingness to pay and preference for the features of raltitrexed versus standard therapy in advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mike Aristides; Jack Chen; Mark Schulz; Eve Williamson; Stephen Clarke; Kaye Grant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Susie H M Kim; Ephraim S Casper; David W Kissane; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  46 in total

1.  Communication with Physicians about Health Care Costs: Survey of an Insured Population.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; Eva Chang; Kevin Ulrich; Deborah King; Melissa L Anderson
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

2.  Evaluation of a Novel Financial Navigator Pilot to Address Patient Concerns about Medical Care Costs.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; John F Dickerson; Nicole L Friedman; David Mosen; Althea X Ender; T Ruth Chang; Tracy A Runge; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

3.  Financial Hardship and Quality of Life among African American and White Cancer Survivors: The Role of Limiting Care Due to Cost.

Authors:  Theresa A Hastert; Jaclyn M Kyko; Amanda R Reed; Felicity W K Harper; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Tara E Baird; Ann G Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  The Effect of Total Cost Information on Consumer Treatment Decisions: An Experimental Survey.

Authors:  Regina Kwon; Larry A Allen; Laura D Scherer; Jocelyn S Thompson; Madiha F Abdel-Maksoud; Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  How communication between cancer patients and their specialists affect the quality and cost of cancer care.

Authors:  Neli Slavova-Azmanova; Jade C Newton; Harry Hohnen; Claire E Johnson; Christobel Saunders
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The cost of cancer care--balancing our duties to patients versus society: are they mutually exclusive?

Authors:  Pallavi Kumar; Beverly Moy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-08

7.  Attitude of Iranian Medical Oncologists Toward Economic Aspects, and Policy-making in Relation to New Cancer Drugs.

Authors:  Rajabali Daroudi; Mehrzad Mirzania; Kazem Zendehdel
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-10-20

Review 8.  A review of cost communication in oncology: Patient attitude, provider acceptance, and outcome assessment.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Financial toxicity in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Sara Bouberhan; Meghan Shea; Alice Kennedy; Adrienne Erlinger; Hannah Stack-Dunnbier; Mary K Buss; Laureen Moss; Kathleen Nolan; Christopher Awtrey; John L Dalrymple; Leslie Garrett; Fong W Liu; Michele R Hacker; Katharine M Esselen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Patient Preferences in Treatment Choices for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Betty C Tong; Scott Wallace; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Joel C Huber
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.