Literature DB >> 26784775

Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries.

Justin E Bekelman1, Scott D Halpern2, Carl Rudolf Blankart3, Julie P Bynum4, Joachim Cohen5, Robert Fowler6, Stein Kaasa7, Lukas Kwietniewski8, Hans Olav Melberg9, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philipsen10, Mariska Oosterveld-Vlug10, Andrew Pring11, Jonas Schreyögg8, Connie M Ulrich12, Julia Verne11, Hannah Wunsch13, Ezekiel J Emanuel12.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Differences in utilization and costs of end-of-life care among developed countries are of considerable policy interest.
OBJECTIVE: To compare site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures in 7 countries: Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using administrative and registry data from 2010. Participants were decedents older than 65 years who died with cancer. Secondary analyses included decedents of any age, decedents older than 65 years with lung cancer, and decedents older than 65 years in the United States and Germany from 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Deaths in acute care hospitals, 3 inpatient measures (hospitalizations in acute care hospitals, admissions to intensive care units, and emergency department visits), 1 outpatient measure (chemotherapy episodes), and hospital expenditures paid by insurers (commercial or governmental) during the 180-day and 30-day periods before death. Expenditures were derived from country-specific methods for costing inpatient services.
RESULTS: The United States (cohort of decedents aged >65 years, N = 211,816) and the Netherlands (N = 7216) had the lowest proportion of decedents die in acute care hospitals (22.2.% and 29.4%, respectively). A higher proportion of decedents died in acute care hospitals in Belgium (N = 21,054; 51.2%), Canada (N = 20,818; 52.1%), England (N = 97,099; 41.7%), Germany (N = 24,434; 38.3%), and Norway (N = 6636; 44.7%). In the last 180 days of life, 40.3% of US decedents had an intensive care unit admission compared with less than 18% in other reporting nations. In the last 180 days of life, mean per capita hospital expenditures were higher in Canada (US $21,840), Norway (US $19,783), and the United States (US $18,500), intermediate in Germany (US $16,221) and Belgium (US $15,699), and lower in the Netherlands (US $10,936) and England (US $9342). Secondary analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients older than 65 years who died with cancer in 7 developed countries in 2010, end-of-life care was more hospital-centric in Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, and Norway than in the Netherlands or the United States. Hospital expenditures near the end of life were higher in the United States, Norway, and Canada, intermediate in Germany and Belgium, and lower in the Netherlands and England. However, intensive care unit admissions were more than twice as common in the United States as in other countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26784775     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.18603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  132 in total

1.  National Policies Fostering Hospice Care Increased Hospice Utilization and Reduced the Invasiveness of End-of-Life Care for Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yu-Yun Shao; Emily Han-Chung Hsiue; Chih-Hung Hsu; Chien-An Yao; Ho-Min Chen; Mei-Shu Lai; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  In-Hospital Deaths Among Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Grant W Waterer; Wesley H Self; D Mark Courtney; Carlos G Grijalva; Robert A Balk; Timothy D Girard; Sherene S Fakhran; Christopher Trabue; Paul McNabb; Evan J Anderson; Derek J Williams; Anna M Bramley; Seema Jain; Kathryn M Edwards; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Comparison of Care Patterns and Rehospitalizations for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in New York and Ontario.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Andrea D Hill; Damon C Scales; Robert A Fowler; May Hua
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-04

4.  Admissions to inpatient care facilities in the last year of life of community-dwelling older people in Europe.

Authors:  Anouk Overbeek; Lieve Van den Block; Ida J Korfage; Yolanda W H Penders; Agnes van der Heide; Judith A C Rietjens
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Trends in end-of-life care and health care spending in women with uterine cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Margolis; Ling Chen; Melissa K Accordino; Grace Clarke Hillyer; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Alfred I Neugut; Cande V Ananth; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Economics of death and dying: a critical evaluation of environmental damages and healthcare reforms across the globe.

Authors:  Rubeena Batool; Khalid Zaman; Muhammad Adnan Khurshid; Salman Masood Sheikh; Alamzeb Aamir; Alaa Mohamd Shoukry; Mohamed A Sharkawy; Fares Aldeek; Jameel Khader; Showkat Gani
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Medical aid in dying: What matters most?

Authors:  Peter Tanuseputro
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Health services research in German radiation oncology: new opportunities to advance cancer care.

Authors:  Daniel Medenwald; Christian T Dietzel; Dirk Vordermark
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Potentially Avoidable Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  P Connor Johnson; Yian Xiao; Risa L Wong; Sara D'Arpino; Samantha M C Moran; Daniel E Lage; Brandon Temel; Margaret Ruddy; Lara N Traeger; Joseph A Greer; Ephraim P Hochberg; Jennifer S Temel; Areej El-Jawahri; Ryan D Nipp
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.