Literature DB >> 26784376

What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: Missing Data and Partial Credit Model Estimates.

Sarah L Thomas1, Karen M Schmidt, Monica K Erbacher, Cindy S Bergeman.   

Abstract

The authors investigated the effect of missing completely at random (MCAR) item responses on partial credit model (PCM) parameter estimates in a longitudinal study of Positive Affect. Participants were 307 adults from the older cohort of the Notre Dame Study of Health and Well-Being (Bergeman and Deboeck, 2014) who completed questionnaires including Positive Affect items for 56 days. Additional missing responses were introduced to the data, randomly replacing 20%, 50%, and 70% of the responses on each item and each day with missing values, in addition to the existing missing data. Results indicated that item locations and person trait level measures diverged from the original estimates as the level of degradation from induced missing data increased. In addition, standard errors of these estimates increased with the level of degradation. Thus, MCAR data does damage the quality and precision of PCM estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26784376      PMCID: PMC5636626     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  7 in total

1.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.

Authors:  Joseph L Schafer; John W Graham
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Analyzing longitudinal data with missing values.

Authors:  Craig K Enders
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2011-10-03

3.  Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.

Authors:  R M Smith; R E Schumacker; M J Bush
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1998

4.  Measuring positive and negative affect in older adults over 56 days: comparing trait level scoring methods using the partial credit model.

Authors:  Monica K Erbacher; Karen M Schmidt; Steven M Boker; Cindy S Bergeman
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2012

5.  Bias in longitudinal data analysis with missing data using typical linear mixed-effects modelling and pattern-mixture approach: an analytical illustration.

Authors:  Manshu Yang; Lijuan Wang; Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

7.  Modeling Change in the Presence of Non-Randomly Missing Data: Evaluating A Shared Parameter Mixture Model.

Authors:  Nisha C Gottfredson; Daniel J Bauer; Scott A Baldwin
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.