Literature DB >> 9661732

Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.

R M Smith1, R E Schumacker, M J Bush.   

Abstract

Throughout the mid to late 1970's considerable research was conducted on the properties of Rasch fit mean squares. This work culminated in a variety of transformations to convert the mean squares into approximate t-statistics. This work was primarily motivated by the influence sample size has on the magnitude of the mean squares and the desire to have a single critical value that can generally be applied to most cases. In the late 1980's and the early 1990's the trend seems to have reversed, with numerous researchers using the untransformed fit mean squares as a means of testing fit to the Rasch measurement models. The principal motivation is cited as the influence sample size has on the sensitivity of the t-converted mean squares. The purpose of this paper is to present the historical development of these fit indices and the various transformations and to examine the impact of sample size on both the fit mean squares and the t-transformations of those mean squares. Because the sample size problem has little influence on the person mean square problem, due to the relatively short length (100 items or less), this paper focuses on the item fit mean squares, where it is common to find the statistics used with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 10,000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9661732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Outcome Meas        ISSN: 1090-655X


  53 in total

1.  A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; J M Norquist; C Jenkinson; B C Reeves; R W Morris; D W Murray; P J Gregg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Developing a Measure of Therapist Adherence to Contingency Management: An Application of the Many-Facet Rasch Model.

Authors:  Jason E Chapman; Ashli J Sheidow; Scott W Henggeler; Colleen Halliday-Boykins; Phillippe B Cunningham
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2008-06-01

3.  Substance use disorder symptoms: evidence of differential item functioning by age.

Authors:  Kendon J Conrad; Michael L Dennis; Nikolaus Bezruczko; Rodney R Funk; Barth B Riley
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2007

4.  Therapist perception of treatment outcome: Evaluating treatment outcomes among youth with antisocial behavior problems.

Authors:  Brent R Crandal; Sharon L Foster; Jason E Chapman; Phillippe B Cunningham; Patricia A Brennan; Elizabeth A Whitmore
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

5.  Development of the ASQoL: a quality of life instrument specific to ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  L C Doward; A Spoorenberg; S A Cook; D Whalley; P S Helliwell; L J Kay; S P McKenna; A Tennant; D van der Heijde; M A Chamberlain
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Measurement properties of the 13-item sense of coherence scale using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Marie Holmefur; Kay Sundberg; Lena Wettergren; Ann Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Interaction of Ability Differences and Guessing When Modeling Differential Item Functioning With the Rasch Model: Conventional and Tailored Calibration.

Authors:  Christine E DeMars; Daniel P Jurich
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  The Stabilizing Influences of Linking Set Size and Model-Data Fit in Sparse Rater-Mediated Assessment Networks.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Eli Jones
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Measuring positive and negative affect in older adults over 56 days: comparing trait level scoring methods using the partial credit model.

Authors:  Monica K Erbacher; Karen M Schmidt; Steven M Boker; Cindy S Bergeman
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2012

10.  Rasch analysis of 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Megan Davidson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.