Literature DB >> 26784364

Impact of gender on requests for ASGE leadership assignments.

Audrey H Calderwood1, Brintha K Enestvedt2, Rebecca DeVivo3, Colleen M Schmitt4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Committee membership in gastroenterology national societies is considered prestigious, opening the door for leadership roles and professional advancement. Some have hypothesized that women ask for leadership opportunities less frequently than men. Our aim was to examine the gender representation of requests for placement on an American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) committee.
METHODS: We analyzed deidentified records of all requests for assignment to ASGE committees from 2011 to 2014, including applicant's gender, prior service to ASGE, year of application, and whether the applicant was appointed. The primary outcome was the proportion of requests from women compared with the overall ASGE female membership.
RESULTS: There were 513 requests for ASGE committee appointments; 101 (20%) were from women, exceeding the active ASGE female membership (15%; P = .004). Overall, the total number of committee requests increased over time from 89 to 195 (P = .08); the proportion of requests from women remained stable at 16% to 21% (P = .51). Compared with men, women were significantly less likely to have had previous ASGE service (28% vs 42%; P = .01) and more likely to have a statement of endorsement from a mentor (33% vs 24%; P = .06). The rate of appointment to a committee was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-52) overall, 42% (95% CI, 37-48) for male applicants, and 65% (95% CI, 54-76) for female applicants. Female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.6; 1.5-4.5), endorsement from a mentor (OR 3.4; 2.1-5.6), and prior ASGE service (OR 2.3; 1.5-3.5) predicted committee appointment.
CONCLUSIONS: For ASGE committee appointments, it appears that women who make requests are successful in receiving these appointments. Future work should evaluate requests and appointments by gender among other gastroenterology societies and explore whether service translates into leadership opportunities for women.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26784364      PMCID: PMC4792747          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

1.  Graduate medical education in the changing environment of medicine.

Authors:  C J Martini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Graduate medical education, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Sarah E Brotherton; Sylvia I Etzel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Through a Gender Lens: A View of Gender and Leadership Positions in a Department of Medicine.

Authors:  Anne K Monroe; Rachel B Levine; Jeanne M Clark; Janet Bickel; Susan M MacDonald; Linda M S Resar
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Inadequate progress for women in academic medicine: findings from the National Faculty Study.

Authors:  Phyllis L Carr; Christine M Gunn; Samantha A Kaplan; Anita Raj; Karen M Freund
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Women otolaryngologist representation in specialty society membership and leadership positions.

Authors:  Sukgi S Choi; Robert H Miller
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Women on professional society and journal editorial boards.

Authors:  Melinda J Morton; Seema S Sonnad
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Is there a gender bias in the advancement to SAGES leadership?

Authors:  Teodora C Dumitra; Roshni Alam; Julio F Fiore; Juan Mata; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou; Carmen Mueller; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Gender differences amongst board members of endocrinology and diabetes societies.

Authors:  Yamna Waseem; Samar Mahmood; Rabbia Siddiqi; Muhammad Shariq Usman; Kaneez Fatima; Christine Acob; Faisal Khosa
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Gender Disparity in Academic Gastroenterology: Beginning of the End of the Underrepresentation of Women?

Authors:  Jason J John; Elizabeth S John; Lauren Pioppo; Arjun Gupta; Sita Chokhavatia; Amy Tilara
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Representation by Gender of Recognition Award Recipients from Gastroenterology and Hepatology Professional Societies.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Jane A Roberts; Julie K Silver; Colleen M Schmitt; Brintha K Enestvedt
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.017

5.  Women remain underrepresented in leadership positions in academic gastroenterology throughout the United States.

Authors:  Daniel S Jamorabo; Richy Chen; Hashroop Gurm; Muntasir Jahangir; William M Briggs; Smruti R Mohanty; Benjamin D Renelus
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.