Jason J John1, Elizabeth S John2, Lauren Pioppo3, Arjun Gupta4, Sita Chokhavatia5, Amy Tilara6. 1. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 1201 E. Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. johnjj@vcu.edu. 2. Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Rutgers University Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 4. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA. 5. Valley Medical Group, Paramus, NJ, USA. 6. Advanced Gastroenterology Associates, Allied Digestive Health, West Long Branch, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Though there are an increasing number of female medical graduates, women remain underrepresented in academic medicine. There have been several reasons to explain this gender disparity, including marital status, number of children, number of hours worked, job flexibility, perceptions of women as inferior leaders, gender bias, sexual harassment, and unsupportive academic climates. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between scholarly productivity and the representation of female gastroenterologists in academia. Specifically, scholarly productivity measured by the h-index and academic rank were explored to determine if there were gender disparities in academic productivity and rank in gastroenterology. METHODS: Gastroenterology departmental listings were obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Interactive Database of the American Medical Association. The Scopus database was used to record each physician's h-index. Statistical analyses were conducted with Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which compared matched samples by academic rank, and ANOVA tests, which compared multiple academic ranks. RESULTS: Out of 1703 academic gastroenterologists, women account for 25% of academic physicians. Women have statistically lower h-indices at the level of Assistant Professor (p = 0.0012), and at the level of Chair (p = 0.01). There was no difference in h-indices between male and female at the rank of Associate Professor and Professor. CONCLUSIONS: While these results mirror patterns appreciated in other fields of medicine, the results at the rank of Chair may suggest that despite the lower h-index compared to their male counterparts, females are perceived as having strong inherent leadership skills outside of academic productivity that are also conducive to leading a department and may be contributing to their rise to Chair.
BACKGROUND: Though there are an increasing number of female medical graduates, women remain underrepresented in academic medicine. There have been several reasons to explain this gender disparity, including marital status, number of children, number of hours worked, job flexibility, perceptions of women as inferior leaders, gender bias, sexual harassment, and unsupportive academic climates. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between scholarly productivity and the representation of female gastroenterologists in academia. Specifically, scholarly productivity measured by the h-index and academic rank were explored to determine if there were gender disparities in academic productivity and rank in gastroenterology. METHODS: Gastroenterology departmental listings were obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Interactive Database of the American Medical Association. The Scopus database was used to record each physician's h-index. Statistical analyses were conducted with Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which compared matched samples by academic rank, and ANOVA tests, which compared multiple academic ranks. RESULTS: Out of 1703 academic gastroenterologists, women account for 25% of academic physicians. Women have statistically lower h-indices at the level of Assistant Professor (p = 0.0012), and at the level of Chair (p = 0.01). There was no difference in h-indices between male and female at the rank of Associate Professor and Professor. CONCLUSIONS: While these results mirror patterns appreciated in other fields of medicine, the results at the rank of Chair may suggest that despite the lower h-index compared to their male counterparts, females are perceived as having strong inherent leadership skills outside of academic productivity that are also conducive to leading a department and may be contributing to their rise to Chair.
Authors: Santiago A Lopez; Peter F Svider; Poonam Misra; Neelakshi Bhagat; Paul D Langer; Jean Anderson Eloy Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Lauren B Gerson; Kay Twomey; Gail Hecht; Linda Lee; Ken McQuaid; Theresa T Pizarro; Sarah Street; Cynthia Yoshida; Dayna Early Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Alison Schneider; Nandhakumar Kanagarajan; David Anjelly; James C Reynolds; Asyia Ahmad Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Angie M Paik; Leila J Mady; Nathaniel L Villanueva; Erden Goljo; Peter F Svider; Frank Ciminello; Jean Anderson Eloy Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Jean Anderson Eloy; Peter F Svider; Deepa V Cherla; Lucia Diaz; Olga Kovalerchik; Kevin M Mauro; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.325