Literature DB >> 2678348

An overview of issues related to the correction of non-differential exposure measurement error in epidemiologic studies.

W Willett1.   

Abstract

Procedures to correct estimates of association in epidemiologic studies for the effects of exposure measurement error have rarely been employed in practice. The application of correction procedures would be enhanced by methods that allow the inclusion of covariates, provide corrected confidence intervals, are compatible with commonly employed analytic methods, and that are clearly communicated to potential users. Before using such a procedure, it is important to clearly specify the conceptual 'true' exposure, determine the nature of the measurement error, and decide whether a reproducibility study or validity study is required to quantify the error. The careful use of correction procedures promises to improve our knowledge of the quantitative relationships between many exposures and disease since it is likely that we have substantially underestimated the effects of many exposures and overstated our confidence in null results.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2678348     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  19 in total

Review 1.  Is blood pressure reduction a valid surrogate endpoint for stroke prevention? An analysis incorporating a systematic review of randomised controlled trials, a by-trial weighted errors-in-variables regression, the surrogate threshold effect (STE) and the Biomarker-Surrogacy (BioSurrogate) Evaluation Schema (BSES).

Authors:  Marissa N Lassere; Kent R Johnson; Michal Schiff; David Rees
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Laurence S Freedman; Janet A Tooze; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Carol Boushey; Marian L Neuhouser; Frances E Thompson; Nancy Potischman; Patricia M Guenther; Valerie Tarasuk; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Bias attenuation results for nondifferentially mismeasured ordinal and coarsened confounders.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Micronutrient Intakes in an Urban US Sample of Multi-Ethnic Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Kelly J Brunst; Srimathi Kannan; Yu-Ming Ni; Chris Gennings; Harish B Ganguri; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

6.  Reliability of serum assays of iron status in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Qi Zhang; Jisen Dai; Roy E Shore; Alan A Arslan; Karen L Koenig; Jerzy Karkoszka; Yelena Afanasyeva; Krystyna Frenkel; Paolo Toniolo; Xi Huang
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  On the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Ogburn; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  A Bayesian multilevel model for estimating the diet/disease relationship in a multicenter study with exposures measured with error: the EPIC study.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrari; Raymond J Carroll; Paul Gustafson; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Drug interactions in users of tablet vs. oral liquid levothyroxine formulations: a real-world evidence study in primary care.

Authors:  Valeria Guglielmi; Alfonso Bellia; Elisa Bianchini; Gerardo Medea; Iacopo Cricelli; Paolo Sbraccia; Davide Lauro; Claudio Cricelli; Francesco Lapi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.

Authors:  Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Helmut Küchenhoff; Guido Fischer; Norman Klopp; Melanie Kolz; Harald Grallert; Caren Vollmert; Stefanie Wagner; Cornelia Huth; Julia Müller; Martina Müller; Steven C Hunt; Annette Peters; Bernhard Paulweber; H-Erich Wichmann; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Illig
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.