| Literature DB >> 26783409 |
Mallappa Kumara Swamy1, Uma Rani Sinniah1, Mohd Sayeed Akhtar2.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of different solvents (ethyl acetate, methanol, acetone, and chloroform) on the extraction of phytoconstituents from Lantana camara leaves and their antioxidant and antibacterial activities. Further, GC-MS analysis was carried out to identify the bioactive chemical constituents occurring in the active extract. The results revealed the presence of various phytocompounds in the extracts. The methanol solvent recovered higher extractable compounds (14.4% of yield) and contained the highest phenolic (92.8 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid (26.5 mg RE/g) content. DPPH radical scavenging assay showed the IC50 value of 165, 200, 245, and 440 μg/mL for methanol, ethyl acetate, acetone, and chloroform extracts, respectively. The hydroxyl scavenging activity test showed the IC50 value of 110, 240, 300, and 510 μg/mL for methanol, ethyl acetate, acetone, and chloroform extracts, respectively. Gram negative bacterial pathogens (E. coli and K. pneumoniae) were more susceptible to all extracts compared to Gram positive bacteria (M. luteus, B. subtilis, and S. aureus). Methanol extract had the highest inhibition activity against all the tested microbes. Moreover, methanolic extract of L. camara contained 32 bioactive components as revealed by GC-MS study. The identified major compounds included hexadecanoic acid (5.197%), phytol (4.528%), caryophyllene oxide (4.605%), and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- (3.751%).Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26783409 PMCID: PMC4689920 DOI: 10.1155/2015/506413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Qualitative screening of phytochemicals present in different solvent extracts of L. camara leaves.
| Phytochemicals | Ethyl acetate | Methanol | Chloroform | Acetone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | − | + | − | + |
| Flavonoids | + | + | + | + |
| Saponins | + | + | − | + |
| Phenolics | + | + | + | + |
| Tannins | − | − | + | − |
| Anthraquinones | + | − | − | + |
| Cardiac glycosides | + | + | + | + |
| Terpenoids | − | + | + | − |
| Steroids | − | + | − | − |
Note: + = present, − = absent.
Dry weight and total yield of different solvent extracts of L. camara leaves.
| Solvent extracts | Weight of the extract ( | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ethyl acetate | 501.3 ± 3.5b | 10.0 |
| Methanol | 721.3 ± 1.5a | 14.4 |
| Acetone | 260.6 ± 4.0c | 5.2 |
| Chloroform | 141.6 ± 2.5d | 2.8 |
Note: each value is expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Values in the column followed by a different letter superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Total phenolics and flavonoids content of different solvent extracts of L. camara leaves.
| Solvent extracts | Total phenolic content | Flavonoid content |
|---|---|---|
| (mg GAE/g) ± SD | (mg RE/g) ± SD | |
| Ethyl acetate | 75.6 ± 0.9b | 16.7 ± 0.6c |
| Methanol | 92.8 ± 1.7a | 26.5 ± 0.5a |
| Acetone | 62.9 ± 1.7c | 20.6 ± 0.3b |
| Chloroform | 33.7 ± 0.5d | 21.2 ± 0.8b |
Note: each value is expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Values in the column followed by a different letter superscript are significantly different (p < 0.05) and values having the same letters are not statistically significant (p < 0.05). GAE: gallic acid equivalent, RE: rutin equivalent.
Figure 1DPPH scavenging activities of various solvent extracts of L. camara.
Figure 2H2O2 scavenging activities of various solvent extracts of L. camara.
Antibacterial activity of different solvent extracts of L. camara at different concentrations.
| Solvent extracts ( | Zone of inhibition (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ethyl acetate | |||||
| 2.5 | 08.2 ± 0.8 | 06.9 ± 0.5 | 06.1 ± 0.7 | 10.0 ± 0.5 | — |
| 5.0 | 13.0 ± 0.9 | 08.3 ± 0.5 | 07.1 ± 0.3 | 13.8 ± 0.5 | 06.1 ± 0.1 |
| 10.0 | 12.0 ± 0.5 | 10.5 ± 0.8 | 07.0 ± 0.5 | 13.9 ± 0.4 | 10.6 ± 0.4 |
| Methanol | |||||
| 2.5 | 14.6 ± 0.5 | 08.2 ± 0.3 | 08.1 ± 0.7 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 14.1 ± 0.2 |
| 5.0 | 18.2 ± 0.2 | 14.5 ± 0.5 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.6 | 16.1 ± 0.6 |
| 10.0 | 24.1 ± 0.4 | 18.1 ± 0.4 | 18.0 ± 0.5 | 16.1 ± 0.2 | 18.0 ± 0.4 |
| Acetone | |||||
| 2.5 | 16.1 ± 0.4 | 06.1 ± 0.6 | 07.9 ± 0.2 | 14.2 ± 0.3 | 05.8 ± 0.6 |
| 5.0 | 24.0 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 15.9 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 0.2 |
| 10.0 | 28.2 ± 0.6 | 16.2 ± 0.2 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 16.3 ± 0.4 | 12.2 ± 0.4 |
| Chloroform | |||||
| 2.5 | 10.6 ± 0.6 | — | — | 10.5 ± 0.9 | — |
| 5.0 | 12.9 ± 0.6 | 09.2 ± 0.2 | 06.8 ± 0.7 | 12.1 ± 0.7 | 07.2 ± 0.2 |
| 10.0 | 14.8 ± 0.3 | 11.4 ± 0.8 | 08.2 ± 0.2 | 12.4 ± 0.4 | 07.9 ± 0.2 |
Note: the negative control discs were soaked with 50 μL DMSO and the positive control discs with 50 μL (50 μg/mL) chloramphenicol. Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 replicates per treatment in 3 repeated experiments. “—” represents no activity.
Figure 3GC-MS chromatograph of methanolic leaf extract of L. camara.
The major phytocompounds detected in the methanolic leaf extract of L. camara by GC-MS analysis.
| S. number | Name of the compound | Peak number | Retention time (min) | Area (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy- | 1 | 2.703 | 0.481 |
| 2 | Propane-1,2,3-triol | 3 | 3.275 | 1.161 |
| 3 | Propargyl alcohol | 4 | 3.653 | 0.877 |
| 4 | Acetic acid, fluoro-, ethyl ester | 5 | 3.719 | 0.737 |
| 5 | Furfuryl alcohol | 7 | 5.672 | 0.750 |
| 6 | 2,4(1H,3H)-Pyrimidinedione, 5-methyl- | 9 | 14.366 | 1.180 |
| 7 | 2,3-Dihydro-2,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one | 11 | 17.443 | 2.954 |
| 8 | Coumaran | 12 | 21.251 | 2.288 |
| 9 | 1,2,3-Propanetriol, 1-acetate | 13 | 22.529 | 1.689 |
| 10 | Cyclohexasiloxane, dodecamethyl- | 14 | 23.200 | 0.978 |
| 11 | 4-Vinylguaiacol | 15 | 25.393 | 0.809 |
| 12 | Bicyclo[5.2.0]nonane, 2-methylene-4,8,8-trimethyl | 19 | 29.798 | 2.065 |
| 13 | Germacrene-D | 21 | 32.547 | 2.185 |
| 14 | Longifolene | 22 | 33.22 | 0.889 |
| 15 | 4-Epi-cubedol | 23 | 34.084 | 0.817 |
| 16 | Caryophyllene oxide | 25 | 36.995 | 4.605 |
| 17 |
| 26 | 37.909 | 2.790 |
| 18 | Humulene epoxide II | 27 | 38.173 | 0.696 |
| 19 | Spathulenol | 30 | 38.886 | 1.888 |
| 20 |
| 34 | 39.997 | 0.507 |
| 21 | Myristic acid | 42 | 43.751 | 0.652 |
| 22 | Neophytadiene | 45 | 46.059 | 0.820 |
| 23 | 3-Eicosyne | 53 | 47.594 | 0.211 |
| 24 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester | 60 | 49.296 | 0.093 |
| 25 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 61 | 49.438 | 0.696 |
| 26 | Hexadecanoic acid | 63 | 50.888 | 5.197 |
| 27 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, methyl ester | 65 | 55.007 | 1.037 |
| 28 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, methyl ester, (Z,Z,Z)- | 66 | 55.225 | 3.751 |
| 29 | Phytol | 67 | 55.426 | 4.528 |
| 30 | Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 68 | 56.428 | 0.330 |
| 31 | 9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- | 70 | 56.640 | 1.019 |
| 32 | Phthalic acid, di(2-propylpentyl) ester | 74 | 67.804 | 0.688 |
Peak number is represented in Figure 3.