| Literature DB >> 27471520 |
Kavita Ghosal1, Bodhisattwa Saha1, Swati Gupta Bhattacharya1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of allergic diseases is increasing gradually and is a global burden affecting the socio-economic quality of life. Identification of allergens is the first step towards paving the way for therapeutic interventions against atopic diseases. Our previous investigation figured out that total pollen load correlated significantly with the rise of respiratory allergy in a subtropical city in India. The most dominant pollen responsible for IgE sensitivity in most patients emerged to be from Lantana camara (LC) an obnoxious weed growing in and around suburban areas of West Bengal. In this study, we identified allergenic components from this shrub using an immunoproteomic approach.Entities:
Keywords: 2D Gel electrophoresis; Aero-allergen; Immunoblot; Lantana camara; MALDI-TOF/TOF; Statistical analysis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27471520 PMCID: PMC4963993 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-016-0135-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol ISSN: 1710-1484 Impact factor: 3.406
Fig. 1Comparative accounts for the interpretation of the hospital data and pollen counts. a Doughnut chart of various types of respiratory diseases in percentages (%) according to patients’ admission. b Male–female comparison from hospital survey. c Age group comparison from hospital survey. d Active–passive smoking comparison from hospital survey. e Comparative graph showing the blooming period of Lantana camara and patients hospitalization during 2010–2011 and 2011–2012
Fig. 21D Immunoblot displaying sIgE reactive bands and their frequency in Cluster analysis. a 1D electrophoresis and IgE specific Immunolbot with LC sensitive patient sera. Lane M molecular marker; Lane C Crude extract of LC pollen in 12 % SDS–PAGE, Lane 1–15 IgE specific Immunoblots with 15 patients’ sera, C1–C6 negative control with sera of non atopic patients. b Graphical representation of cluster analysis showing the frequency of seven IgE reactive bands. A Minor allergens, B Major allergens; ~25–27 and ~30 kDa were present in highest frequency and therefore considered the major allergen; I Most sensitive, II intermediate sensitive patients, III Most sensitive towards major allergens
Fig. 3Identification IgE reactive proteins from the two dimensional map of Lantana camara. a 2D gel profile of the total protein extracted from LC and marked with arrows of IgE reactive. spots corresponding to immunoblot analysis; M: molecular marker, b 2D-IgE specific immunoblots revealed IgE reactive spots in 7 cm gel. c 2D immunoblot with healthy patient sera as negative control
Identification of allergens from Lantana camara pollen grains using MALDI TOF/TOF
| SN | Identified proteind | Organism | Accession no. | Identified peptidesb | E valuea | Expt. MW/pI | Theor. MW/pI | Score | UPb | Seq. cov. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Actin |
| CAA23728.1 | KIWHHTFYNELRV | 0.0019 | 45.6/5.8 | 41.56/5.23 | 64 | 2 | 3.45 |
|
| AAL89713.1 | KSFELPDGQVITIGNERF | 6.2e−05 | 19.996/5.02 | 78 | 9.94 | ||||
| 2. | Actin | Glycine max | CAA23728.1 | KIWHHTFYNELRV | 0.00017 | 45.6/5.8 | 41.56/5.23 | 69 | 3 | 3.45 |
|
| AAB07499.1 | KSYELPDGQVITIGNERF | 1.3e−05 | 23.18/4.89 | 83 | 8.78 | ||||
|
| AGV54465.1 | RTTGIVLDSGNGVSHTVPIYEGYALPHAILRL | 0.0037 | 41.66/5.39 | 50 | 8.48 | ||||
| 3. | TLP; Ole e 13 |
| E3SU11.1 | RCPDAYSYPQDDPTSLFTCPAGTNYRV | 1.3 | 19.4 | 24.7/5.1 | 31 | 2 | 11.94 |
| HP |
| EYU38379.1 | RCTAPINEQCPNELRA | 0.075 | 24.9/5.3 | 42 | 6.95 | |||
| 4. | F1ATPase |
| BAA20135.1 | KTEHFLPIHRE | 0.014 | 51.8/5.5 | 60.1/6.6 | 52 | 3 | 1.96 |
| ATP Synthase subunit beta |
| CAA26620 | RFTQANSEVSALLGRI | 0.027 | 59.8/5.9 | 48 | 2.85 | |||
|
| CAA52636.1 | RLVLEVAQHLGENVVRT | 0.013 | 59.24/5.5 | 50 | 3.07 | ||||
| 5. | ATP Synthase beta subunit |
| CAA52636.1 | RLVLEVAQHLGENVVRT | 0.046 | 51.8/5.6 | 59.2/5.56 | 44 | 2 | 3.07 |
|
| CAA26620.1 | RDAEGQDVLLFIDNIFRF | 0.0077 | 59.85/5.95 | 56 | 3.21 | ||||
| 6. |
|
| CAA52636.1 | RLVLEVAQHLGENVVRT | 0.43 | 51.84/ | 59.24/5.56 | 38 | 2 | 3.07 |
|
| CAA26620.1 | RDAEGQDVLLFIDNIFRF | 0.29 | 5.7 | 59.85/5.95 | 40 | 3.21 | |||
| 7. | TLP; Ole e 13 |
| E3SU11.1 | RCPDAYSYPQDDPTSLFTCPAGTNYRV | 5.1e−13 | 21.85/6.5 | 24.72/5.10 | 150 | 3 | 11.94 |
| Predicted TLP |
| XP_004252644.1 | RLDSGQSWQVNVAARVRAR | NAc | 45.53/4.95 | 4.55 | ||||
| PRP |
| XP_006364119.1 | NQQCPNELRN | NAc | 25.00/5.31 | 4.4 | ||||
| 8. | TLP; Ole e 13 | ( | E3SU11.1 | RCPDAYSYPQDDPT | 5.9e−06 | 19.28/6.159 | 24.72/5.10 | 79 | 2 | 11.94 |
| HP |
| EYU38385.1 | RCTAPINEQCPNELRA | 0.018 | 81.11/8.03 | 48 | 2.2 | |||
| 9. | Predicted GAD 1- like |
| XP_003544967.1 | KVLHELDLLPARV | 0.94 | 52.685/5.831 | 34 | 2 | 2.58 | |
| GAD |
| AAM48129.1 | HNEFELSDTLR | NAc | 2.21 |
aProbability score at the <0.05 level
bUP, unique peptides have been identified by MASCOT search against NCBI database
cManual de novo sequencing has been performed for the respective peptide sequence
dIdentified proteins: actin, TLP, thaumatin like protein; HP, hypothetical protein MIMGU_ngvla013131 mg; PRP, pathogenesis related protein, GAD, glutamic acid decarboxylase
Fig. 4De novo sequencing from the spot no: 7. a, b De novo sequencing of peptide m/z: 1683.77 and 2169.09 Da from the spot no: 7; the derived sequences are mentioned on the top of the spectra.. c MASCOT result of peptide 2895.34 Da showing similarity with allergen Ole e 13 from Olive also described as Thaumatin like protein (TLP). d Result of MS-BLAST with the two derived peptides 1683.77 and 2169.09 Da demonstrating significant homology with (TLP) from Solanum lycopersicon. C* carbamidomethylated cysteine
Fig. 5De novo sequencing from the spot no: 9. a De novo sequencing of Peptide m/z: 1360.786 Da from the spot no: 9 The derived sequence is mentioned on the top of the spectra. b Result of MS-BLAST with the peptide 1360.786 Da demonstrating significant homology with Glutamate decarboxylase from Nicotiana tabacum
Result of SPT, histamine release assay and IgE specific ELISA
| Patient no | Age/sex | Symptomsa/clinical history | Aeroallergenb sensitization/SPT gradec for | Histamine release in cell (concentration nM) | Specific IgE-ELISA for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18/F | AR, SOB | CN, LC/(+3) | 1912.973 | 2.8 |
| 2 | 30/M | AR | AC, LC/(+3) | 1001.521 | 2.76 |
| 3 | 25/M | AR + BA, SOB | GP, TG, LC/(+3) | 768.489 | 2.66 |
| 4 | 31/F | AR + BA | AF, AI, LC//(+4) | 1500.347 | 3.1 |
| 5 | 27/F | AR, SOB | AC, CN, LC/(+4) | 817.62 | 3.32 |
| 6 | 16/F | AR + BA | HD, AF, LC/(+4) | 623.983 | 2.92 |
| 7 | 37/M | AR | CP, TG, PS, LC/(+3) | 737.714 | 3.06 |
| 8 | 34/F | AR, SOB | AI, CP, LC/(+2) | 1999.624 | 2.43 |
| 9 | 41/M | AR + BA, SOB | GP, PS, LC/(+3) | 915.651 | 2.95 |
| 10 | 42/F | AR + BA, SOB | PS, LC,/(+3) | 1280.903 | 2.67 |
| 11 | 34/F | AR + BA | CN, LC/(+4) | 676.54 | 3.4 |
| 12 | 30/M | AR | CN, PS, LC/(+3) | 1622.213 | 2.79 |
| 13 | 35/M | AR, SOB | GP, LC/(+2) | 814.312 | 2.37 |
| 14 | 41/M | AR | AC, CN, LC/(+3) | 1315.149 | 2.76 |
| 15 | 22/F | AR | GP, LC/(+3) | 1722.743 | 3.00 |
| Control | |||||
| 1 | 25/F | AR + BA | AI, AF/(+3) | 31.619 | 0.847 |
| 2 | 15/F | AR | CP, CN/(+2) | 10.237 | 0.912 |
| 3 | 23/M | AR + BA | HD, AI/(+3) | 80.143 | 1.105 |
| 4 | 30/F | AR | CP, PS/(+3) | 62.358 | 1.131 |
| 5 | 28/M | AR + BA | CN, HD/(+2) | 19.186 | 0.984 |
aSymptoms: AR allergic rhinitis, BA bronchial asthma
bAeroallergens: AC, Areca catechu; AF, Aspergillus flavus; AI, Azadirachta indica; CN, Cocos nucifera; CP, Carica papaya; GP, grass pollen; HD, house dust; LC, Lantana camara; PS, Phoenix sylvestris
cReactions in SPT: +no wheal and erythema of 20 mm in diameter; ++wheal and erythema of 20 mm in diameter; +++wheal and erythema >30 mm; no wheal and no erythema; control group had P/N value <1.5
dP/N: ratio of optical density of patient serum with respect to control
Fig. 6Allergenic Potency of Lantana pollen extract and its major allergen. a Specific IgE ELISA. Dot plot showing the distribution of group specific IgE titers among 15 patients due to crude allergen extract along with IgE titers. b Stripped basophil histamine release assay. Grouped distribution showing histamine release due to crude allergen; control and BSA: Negative control. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA employing Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. *Represents significance at p < 0.05. Specific IgE titers were significant in pairs and across columns. Patients of Group 1 (1, 8, 15, 12, 10, 14) showed elevated histamine release compared to others. c Linear regression model following Spearman’s correlation of total histamine release in cell and sIgE-ELISA of Lantana camara. Correlation coefficient (r) value: 0.8007; p value: 0.003 where correlation is significant <0.005 level