Literature DB >> 26783289

The Majority of Expedited Investigational New Drug Safety Reports Are Uninformative.

Jonathan P Jarow1, Sandra Casak1, Meredith Chuk1, Lori A Ehrlich1, Sean Khozin2.   

Abstract

Sponsors of human drug and biologic products subject to an investigational new drug (IND) application are required to distribute expedited safety reports of serious and unexpected suspected adverse reactions to participating investigators and the FDA to assure the protection of human subjects participating in clinical trials. On September 29, 2010, the FDA issued a final rule amending its regulations governing expedited IND safety reporting requirements that revised the definitions used for reporting and clarified when to submit relevant and useful information to reduce the number of uninformative reports distributed by sponsors. From January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014, the FDA's Office of Hematology and Oncology Products received an average of 17,686 expedited safety reports per year. An analysis of FDA submissions by commercial sponsors covering this time period suggested a slight increase in the number of expedited safety reports per IND per year after publication of the final rule. An audit of 160 randomly selected expedited safety reports submitted to the FDA's Office of Hematology and Oncology Products in 2015 revealed that only 22 (14%) were informative. The submission of uninformative expedited safety reports by commercial sponsors of INDs continues to be a significant problem that can compromise detection of valid safety signals. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2111-3. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26783289     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinician Perspectives on Current Issues in Lung Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Saiama N Waqar; Philip D Bonomi; Ramaswamy Govindan; Fred R Hirsch; Gregory J Riely; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Dickran Kazandjian; Sean Khozin; Erin Larkins; Dane J Dickson; Shakun Malik; Leora Horn; Andrea Ferris; Alice T Shaw; Pasi A Jänne; Tony S K Mok; Roy Herbst; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur; Gideon M Blumenthal
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Commentary on Perez et al.: How to create a 21st century adverse event reporting system.

Authors:  Elad Sharon
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Health policy: Strategies to optimize expedited investigational new drug safety reports.

Authors:  Apostolia M Tsimberidou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Causality Assessment in Premarketing Drug Clinical Trials: Regulatory Evolution in the USA and Ongoing Concerns.

Authors:  Stephen A Goldman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Impact of Expanded Access on FDA Regulatory Action and Product Labeling.

Authors:  Jonathan P Jarow; Richard Moscicki
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 6.  Beyond maximum grade: modernising the assessment and reporting of adverse events in haematological malignancies.

Authors:  Gita Thanarajasingam; Lori M Minasian; Frederic Baron; Franco Cavalli; R Angelo De Claro; Amylou C Dueck; Tarec C El-Galaly; Neil Everest; Jan Geissler; Christian Gisselbrecht; John Gribben; Mary Horowitz; S Percy Ivy; Caron A Jacobson; Armand Keating; Paul G Kluetz; Aviva Krauss; Yok Lam Kwong; Richard F Little; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Matthew J Matasar; María-Victoria Mateos; Kristen McCullough; Robert S Miller; Mohamad Mohty; Philippe Moreau; Lindsay M Morton; Sumimasa Nagai; Simon Rule; Jeff Sloan; Pieter Sonneveld; Carrie A Thompson; Kyriaki Tzogani; Flora E van Leeuwen; Galina Velikova; Diego Villa; John R Wingard; Sophie Wintrich; John F Seymour; Thomas M Habermann
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 18.959

7.  Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application.

Authors:  Martin J Landray; Jeroen J Bax; Laurence Alliot; Marc Buyse; Adam Cohen; Rory Collins; Gerhard Hindricks; Stefan K James; Sile Lane; Aldo P Maggioni; Ann Meeker-O'Connell; Gunnar Olsson; Stuart J Pocock; Michael Rawlins; Jonathan Sellors; Kaori Shinagawa; Karin R Sipido; Liam Smeeth; Richard Stephens; Murray W Stewart; Wendy Gattis Stough; Fergus Sweeney; Frans Van de Werf; Kerrie Woods; Barbara Casadei
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Sponsors' and investigative staffs' perceptions of the current investigational new drug safety reporting process in oncology trials.

Authors:  Raymond Perez; Patrick Archdeacon; Nancy Roach; Robert Goodwin; Jonathan Jarow; Nina Stuccio; Annemarie Forrest
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Analysis of Suspension of Clinical Trials for Drug Registration in China.

Authors:  Xian Su; Xiaocong Pang; Xin Zeng; Yi Gao; Yimin Cui; Haixue Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Experience, Perceptions, and Recommendations Concerning COVID-19-Related Clinical Research Adjustments.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Thomas Y Sheffield; M Shaalan Beg; Erin L Williams; Valerie L Clark; Yang Xie; M E Blair Holbein; Celette Sugg Skinner; Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 11.908

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.