Literature DB >> 28329235

Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application.

Martin J Landray1, Jeroen J Bax2, Laurence Alliot3, Marc Buyse4,5, Adam Cohen6, Rory Collins1, Gerhard Hindricks7, Stefan K James8, Sile Lane9, Aldo P Maggioni10, Ann Meeker-O'Connell11, Gunnar Olsson12, Stuart J Pocock13, Michael Rawlins14, Jonathan Sellors15, Kaori Shinagawa16, Karin R Sipido17, Liam Smeeth13, Richard Stephens18, Murray W Stewart19, Wendy Gattis Stough20, Fergus Sweeney21, Frans Van de Werf22, Kerrie Woods23, Barbara Casadei24.   

Abstract

Evidence generated from randomized controlled trials forms the foundation of cardiovascular therapeutics and has led to the adoption of numerous drugs and devices that prolong survival and reduce morbidity, as well as the avoidance of interventions that have been shown to be ineffective or even unsafe. Many aspects of cardiovascular research have evolved considerably since the first randomized trials in cardiology were conducted. In order to be large enough to provide reliable evidence about effects on major outcomes, cardiovascular trials may now involve thousands of patients recruited from hundreds of clinical sites in many different countries. Costly infrastructure has developed to meet the increasingly complex organizational and operational requirements of these clinical trials. Concerns have been raised that this approach is unsustainable, inhibiting the reliable evaluation of new and existing treatments, to the detriment of patient care. These issues were considered by patients, regulators, funders, and trialists at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Roundtable in October 2015. This paper summarizes the key insights and discussions from the workshop, highlights subsequent progress, and identifies next steps to produce meaningful change in the conduct of cardiovascular clinical research. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular diseases; Clinical trials; Pragmatic clinical trials; Randomized controlled trials

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28329235      PMCID: PMC5837481          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  37 in total

1.  The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Buyse; S L George; S Evans; N L Geller; J Ranstam; B Scherrer; E Lesaffre; G Murray; L Edler; J Hutton; T Colton; P Lachenbruch; B L Verma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise.

Authors:  Paul Glasziou; Iain Chalmers; Michael Rawlins; Peter McCulloch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17

3.  De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Michael Rawlins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Large streamlined trials in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Gonzalo Calvo; John J V McMurray; Christopher B Granger; Ángeles Alonso-García; Paul Armstrong; Marcus Flather; Antonio Gómez-Outes; Stuart Pocock; Norman Stockbridge; Anders Svensson; Frans Van de Werf
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  The future of cardiovascular clinical research in North America and beyond-addressing challenges and leveraging opportunities through unique academic and grassroots collaborations.

Authors:  Matthew T Roe; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Justin A Ezekowitz; John H Alexander; Shaun G Goodman; Adrian Hernandez; Tracy Temple; Lisa Berdan; Robert M Califf; Robert A Harrington; Eric D Peterson; Paul W Armstrong
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Impact of source data verification on data quality in clinical trials: an empirical post hoc analysis of three phase 3 randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Jeppe Ragnar Andersen; Inger Byrjalsen; Asger Bihlet; Faidra Kalakou; Hans Christian Hoeck; Gitte Hansen; Henrik Bo Hansen; Morten Asser Karsdal; Bente Juel Riis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds.

Authors:  Robert J Mentz; Adrian F Hernandez; Lisa G Berdan; Tyrus Rorick; Emily C O'Brien; Jenny C Ibarra; Lesley H Curtis; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Good intentions and ICH-GCP: Trial conduct training needs to go beyond the ICH-GCP document and include the intention-to-treat principle.

Authors:  Lois H Browne; Peter H Graham
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Gordon Guyatt; Hertzel Gerstein; Stuart Connolly; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial.

Authors:  D S Echt; P R Liebson; L B Mitchell; R W Peters; D Obias-Manno; A H Barker; D Arensberg; A Baker; L Friedman; H L Greene
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Making trials part of good clinical care: lessons from the RECOVERY trial.

Authors:  Guilherme Pessoa-Amorim; Mark Campbell; Lucy Fletcher; Peter Horby; Martin Landray; Marion Mafham; Richard Haynes
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-07

2.  Good Clinical Trials by removing defensive interpretation of Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Authors:  Jonas M den Heijer; Jules A A C Heuberger; Hemme Hijma; Annelieke C Kruithof; Jeroen van Smeden; Geert Jan Groeneveld; Jacobus Burggraaf; Adam Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.716

3.  Challenges in conducting clinical trials in nephrology: conclusions from a Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.

Authors:  Colin Baigent; William G Herrington; Josef Coresh; Martin J Landray; Adeera Levin; Vlado Perkovic; Marc A Pfeffer; Peter Rossing; Michael Walsh; Christoph Wanner; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Central statistical monitoring of investigator-led clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Laura Trotta; Everardo D Saad; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Infectious diseases epidemiology, quantitative methodology, and clinical research in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspective from a European country.

Authors:  Geert Molenberghs; Marc Buyse; Steven Abrams; Niel Hens; Philippe Beutels; Christel Faes; Geert Verbeke; Pierre Van Damme; Herman Goossens; Thomas Neyens; Sereina Herzog; Heidi Theeten; Koen Pepermans; Ariel Alonso Abad; Ingrid Van Keilegom; Niko Speybroeck; Catherine Legrand; Stefanie De Buyser; Frank Hulstaert
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Kidney disease trials for the 21st century: innovations in design and conduct.

Authors:  William G Herrington; Natalie Staplin; Richard Haynes
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  Adverse Events as End Points: The Need to Account for Both Sides of the Same Coin.

Authors:  Felipe Aizpuru
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Ethical review of patient safety and public health in EU clinical trials legislation: impact of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Anca Parmena Olimid; Daniel Alin Olimid
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.033

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.