Literature DB >> 26782749

Description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov., Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactors, and emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum.

Sarah Hahnke1, Thomas Langer1, Daniela E Koeck2, Michael Klocke1.   

Abstract

Three novel, facultatively anaerobic bacteria of the family Porphyromonadaceae (phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactors. The strains were Gram-negative rods. Optimal growth occurred between 35 and 45 °C and at pH 7.1-7.8. The main fermentation products were acetic and propionic acids. The predominant fatty acid in all strains was anteiso-C15 : 0, and the only respiratory quinone detected was menaquinone MK-8. 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison indicated that strains M3/6T and ING2-E5BT were most closely related to the type strain of Proteiniphilum acetatigenes, with sequence similarities of 97.3 and 94.5 %. Strain ING2-E5AT showed the closest affiliation to the type strain of Petrimonas sulfuriphila, with 97 % sequence identity. DNA-DNA hybridization of strain M3/6T and ING2-E5AT with the most closely related type strains showed 43.3-45.6 and 23.8-25.7 % relatedness, respectively, which supports the conclusion that both isolates represent novel species. Phylogenetic analysis and comparison of cellular fatty acid patterns indicated that strain ING2-E5BT cannot be classified as a member of any previously described genus. Therefore, because of the physiological, genotypic and chemotaxonomic differences, it is proposed to designate novel species within the genera Proteiniphilum and Petrimonas, Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov. (type strain M3/6T = DSM 28694T = CECT 8610T = LMG 28299T) and Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. (type strain ING2-E5AT = DSM 28695T = CECT 8611T), and a novel species of a new genus, Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov. (type strain of Fermentimonas caenicola is ING2-E5BT = DSM 28696T = CECT 8609T = LMG 28429T). In addition, an emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum is provided.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26782749     DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  22 in total

1.  Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes.

Authors:  Marina García-López; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Brian J Tindall; Sabine Gronow; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Richard L Hahnke; Markus Göker
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  A Microcosm Model for the Study of Microbial Community Shift and Carbon Emission from Landfills.

Authors:  Isita Sagar; Yogesh Nimonkar; Dhiraj Dhotre; Yogesh Shouche; Dilip Ranade; Sahabram Dewala; Om Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 3.  Management of microbial enzymes for biofuels and biogas production by using metagenomic and genome editing approaches.

Authors:  J Rajesh Banu; Gopalakrishnan Kumar; Indranil Chattopadhyay
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.893

4.  Comparison of microbial community structures between mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of vegetable waste.

Authors:  Tianjie Ao; Zhijie Xie; Pan Zhou; Xiaofeng Liu; Liping Wan; Dong Li
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Metaproteomics-guided selection of targeted enzymes for bioprospecting of mixed microbial communities.

Authors:  Jutta Speda; Bengt-Harald Jonsson; Uno Carlsson; Martin Karlsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Chemically Stressed Bacterial Communities in Anaerobic Digesters Exhibit Resilience and Ecological Flexibility.

Authors:  Benjamin Schwan; Christian Abendroth; Adriel Latorre-Pérez; Manuel Porcar; Cristina Vilanova; Christina Dornack
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Transition of microbial community structures after development of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs).

Authors:  Yuya Sato; Yan-Jie Zhao; Tomoyuki Hori; Tomo Aoyagi; Tomohiro Inaba; Hidenobu Aizawa; Atsushi Ogata; Hiroshi Habe
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Unraveling the microbiome of a thermophilic biogas plant by metagenome and metatranscriptome analysis complemented by characterization of bacterial and archaeal isolates.

Authors:  Irena Maus; Daniela E Koeck; Katharina G Cibis; Sarah Hahnke; Yong S Kim; Thomas Langer; Jana Kreubel; Marcel Erhard; Andreas Bremges; Sandra Off; Yvonne Stolze; Sebastian Jaenicke; Alexander Goesmann; Alexander Sczyrba; Paul Scherer; Helmut König; Wolfgang H Schwarz; Vladimir V Zverlov; Wolfgang Liebl; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter; Michael Klocke
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Long-Term Biogas Production from Glycolate by Diverse and Highly Dynamic Communities.

Authors:  Susanne Günther; Daniela Becker; Thomas Hübschmann; Susann Reinert; Sabine Kleinsteuber; Susann Müller; Christian Wilhelm
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Genomics and prevalence of bacterial and archaeal isolates from biogas-producing microbiomes.

Authors:  Irena Maus; Andreas Bremges; Yvonne Stolze; Sarah Hahnke; Katharina G Cibis; Daniela E Koeck; Yong S Kim; Jana Kreubel; Julia Hassa; Daniel Wibberg; Aaron Weimann; Sandra Off; Robbin Stantscheff; Vladimir V Zverlov; Wolfgang H Schwarz; Helmut König; Wolfgang Liebl; Paul Scherer; Alice C McHardy; Alexander Sczyrba; Michael Klocke; Alfred Pühler; Andreas Schlüter
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.