Literature DB >> 26781240

The Effect of Various Probiotic Strains or Avilamycin Feed Additive on Immune Defense Markers and Acute-Phase Response to Salmonella Infection in Chickens.

Maria Bielecka1, Wanda Smoragiewicz2, Andrzej K Siwicki3, Roman Wójcik3, Elżbieta Biedrzycka1, Andrzej Orłowski1, Signe Kask4, Jan Jankowski5, Barbara Karska-Wysocki6, Daniela Ham7.   

Abstract

Probiotics are a nutritional tool for disease prevention. It has been proposed that stimulation of immune response could affect the growth-promoting properties of antimicrobial growth promoters as well as the control of foodborne pathogens. The current study compares immune response in the blood of 280 non-infected and Salmonella-infected chickens fed either with the growth promoter avilamycin or with one of five probiotic strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which also showed growth-promoting properties. All of the probiotic strains stimulated superoxide anion production and the proliferation of leukocytes, while raising lysozyme and γ-globulin levels (by up to 65%, p < 0.01), which are important factors in native and cell-mediated immune defense against pathogens. In contrast, among the two strains examined, specific Salmonella antibodies were induced only by L. salivarius, and not by B. animalis, as assessed by the ELISA method and confirmed by an agglutination reaction (p < 0.05). In the avilamycin-fed group, both non-infected and infected chickens showed decreased levels of these immune markers (by 30%) and increased levels of ceruloplasmin by up to 35%. In contrast, the probiotics suppressed acute-phase response assessed by ceruloplasmin by up to 32%. This correlation implies that various antimicrobial feed additives have a distinct effect on immunomodulation, which may affect different mechanisms in the nutrition-related metabolism associated with the rate of weight gain in chickens. The data could contribute to the design of innovative antimicrobial feed additives in the food industry and consequently to well-being of humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial feed additives; Non-specific immunity; Poultry; Probiotics; Salmonella

Year:  2010        PMID: 26781240     DOI: 10.1007/s12602-010-9054-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins        ISSN: 1867-1306            Impact factor:   4.609


  33 in total

1.  A RAPID AND SENSITIVE ASSAY OF MURAMIDASE.

Authors:  R M PARRY; R C CHANDAN; K M SHAHANI
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1965-06

2.  Immunomodulation by probiotic lactobacilli in layer- and meat-type chickens.

Authors:  M E Koenen; J Kramer; R van der Hulst; L Heres; S H M Jeurissen; W J A Boersma
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.095

3.  Antibody response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA.

Authors:  J O Hassan; P A Barrow; A P Mockett; S Mcleod
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1990-05-26       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens.

Authors:  Hamid R Haghighi; Jianhua Gong; Carlton L Gyles; M Anthony Hayes; Babak Sanei; Payvand Parvizi; Haris Gisavi; James R Chambers; Shayan Sharif
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Influence of avilamycin administration and its subsequent withdrawal on emergence and disappearance of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci in the intestine of broiler chickens.

Authors:  Y Katsunuma; M Hanazumi; H Fujisaki; H Minato; Y Hashimoto; C Yonemochi
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Characterization of the innate and adaptive immunity to Salmonella enteritidis PT1 infection in four broiler lines.

Authors:  J Kramer; A H Visscher; J A Wagenaar; A G Boonstra-Blom; S H Jeurissen
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2001-05-30       Impact factor: 2.046

7.  Effect of avilamycin fed to chickens on E. faecium counts and on the selection of avilamycin-resistant E. faecium populations.

Authors:  P Butaye; L A Devriese; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.431

8.  Combined antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus faecium isolated from chickens.

Authors:  Odile Petsaris; Fabien Miszczak; Mireille Gicquel-Bruneau; Agnès Perrin-Guyomard; Florence Humbert; Pascal Sanders; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Impact of dietary components on chicken immune system and Salmonella infection.

Authors:  Uma S Babu; Richard B Raybourne
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Infection and reinfection of chickens with Salmonella typhimurium: bacteriology and immune responses.

Authors:  J O Hassan; A P Mockett; D Catty; P A Barrow
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Chemotaxis, Phagocytosis, and Oxidative Burst of Peripheral Blood Granulocytes and Monocytes in Goats.

Authors:  Roman Wójcik; Katarzyna Ząbek; Joanna Małaczewska; Stanisław Milewski; Edyta Kaczorek-Łukowska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  The Control of Intestinal Inflammation: A Major Objective in the Research of Probiotic Strains as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters in Poultry.

Authors:  Joan Tarradas; Núria Tous; Enric Esteve-Garcia; And Joaquim Brufau
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.