| Literature DB >> 26781037 |
Irit Lubitz1, Jan Ricny2, Dana Atrakchi-Baranes1, Chen Shemesh1, Efrat Kravitz1, Sigal Liraz-Zaltsman1, Anna Maksin-Matveev1, Itzik Cooper1, Avshalom Leibowitz3, Jaime Uribarri4, James Schmeidler4, Weijing Cai4, Zdena Kristofikova2, Daniela Ripova2, Derek LeRoith5, Michal Schnaider-Beeri1,4.
Abstract
There is growing evidence of the involvement of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative processes including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their function as a seed for the aggregation of Aβ, a hallmark feature of AD. AGEs are formed endogenously and exogenously during heating and irradiation of foods. We here examined the effect of a diet high in AGEs in the context of an irradiated diet on memory, insoluble Aβ42 , AGEs levels in hippocampus, on expression of the receptor for AGEs (RAGE), and on oxidative stress in the vasculature. We found that AD-like model mice on high-AGE diet due to irradiation had significantly poorer memory, higher hippocampal levels of insoluble Aβ42 and AGEs as well as higher levels of oxidative stress on vascular walls, compared to littermates fed an isocaloric diet. These differences were not due to weight gain. The data were further supported by the overexpression of RAGE, which binds to Aβ42 and regulates its transport across the blood-brain barrier, suggesting a mediating pathway. Because exposure to AGEs can be diminished, these insights provide an important simple noninvasive potential therapeutic strategy for alleviating a major lifestyle-linked disease epidemic.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Aβ; Tg2576; advanced glycation end product; blood-brain barrier; receptor for advanced glycation end product
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26781037 PMCID: PMC4783343 DOI: 10.1111/acel.12436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 9.304
Figure 1ELISA analysis of AGES levels in serum, after 1 month on the diet, MG (A) and CML (B). Mean ± SEM, *P < 0.001, n = 9 per group.
Characteristics of animals
| WT H‐AGE | WT R‐AGE | Tg H‐AGE | Tg R‐AGE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ Weight gain (g) | 7.9 ± 0.18 | 8.74 ± 0.17 | 8.74 ± 0.22 | 7.6 ± 0.24 |
| End weight (g) | 37.1 ± 0.17 | 38.5 ± 0.19 | 34.3 ± 0.22 | 33.4 ± 0.24 |
| Fasting glucose baseline (mg dL−1) | 107.5 ± 2.8 | 115 ± 7.4 | 118.7 ± 8 | 110 ± 6.5 |
| Fasting glucose at end (mg dL−1) | 140 ± 5.3 | 139 ± 5.9 | 146 ± 11.4 | 136.5 ± 6.7 |
Data are means ± SEM, ns.
Pearson correlation of insoluble Aβ42 in hippocampuses of Tg2576 mice with levels of CML and MG detected in urine
| Correlations | ||
|---|---|---|
| CML | MG | |
| Insoluble Aβ42 | ||
| H‐AGE, | 0.619 | 0.632 |
| R‐AGE, | −0.019 | 0.067 |
Pearson Correlation is significant at the 0.05 leval (two‐tailed).
P‐value = 0.057.
Figure 2Exacerbation of learning and memory deficit in Tg2576 mice, on high‐AGE diet. (A–C) Morris water maze test at 11 month. Escape latencies in hidden‐platform trails (n = 10 per group). P < 0.05 for genotype × day × diet (A) latency to locate platform at day 5 *P < 0.05 vs. Tg‐R; # P < 0.01 vs. WT‐H (B) Swimming pattern, black dot indicates the area where the platform was located (NS). (C) Data are mean ± SEM.
Figure 3In situ detection of superoxide production with dihydroethidium (DHE) in isolated aorta. (A) DHE staining in Tg2576 mice on H‐AGE diet compared to R‐AGE diet (n = 10 per group). (B) Calculation of cell staining with DHE in vessels from the different diets, combined red and blue fluorescence, was quantified in three sections per mice. *P = 0.01 for Tg‐H vs. Tg‐R and for WT‐H vs. WT‐R. Scale bar 20 μm.
Figure 4The effect of AGE due to irradiated diet on RAGE expression in the brain. (A) Representative figure of RAGE expression in the cortex. AGE receptors were increased in the cortex of high‐AGE diet mice (both Tg2576 and WT). Red, anti‐RAGE antibody staining, green, blood vessels stained by FITC conjugated fluorescein L. esculentum lectin, an endothelial cell marker. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) RAGE expression on the capillaries was increased in H‐AGE diet mice compared to R‐AGE diet. (C) RAGE mRNA level was upregulated by AGE diet. Tg‐H *P < 0.05 vs. Tg‐R, and # p < 0.05 vs. WT‐R; **p < 0.05 WT‐H vs. WT‐R; Data are mean ± SEM, n = 5. Scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 5Dot blot analysis was used to analyze insoluble Aβ fraction extracted from hippocampus, immunoprobed with anti‐AGE antibody. Two microliters of protein lysates was spotted on membrane. Data are integral densities with subtracted background, corrected for protein concentration (Mean ± SEM) *P < 0.001 vs. Tg2576 on R‐AGE diet and WT on both diets, n = 8 per group.
Characteristics of Dietary Formulas
| Nutrients | R‐AGE | H‐AGE |
|---|---|---|
| Protein (%) | 18.6 | 18.6 |
| Fat (%) | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Carbohydrates (%) | 44.2 | 44.2 |
| Energy density (kcal/g) | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| MG (ng/g) | 6.2 | 14.5 |
| CML (ng/g) | 1.6 | 5.1 |