Literature DB >> 26780725

One size does not fit all: developing a cell-specific niche for in vitro study of cell behavior.

Milos Marinkovic1, Travis J Block1, Rubie Rakian2, Qihong Li3, Exing Wang4, Matthew A Reilly5, David D Dean1, Xiao-Dong Chen6.   

Abstract

For more than 100years, cells and tissues have been studied in vitro using glass and plastic surfaces. Over the last 10-20years, a great body of research has shown that cells are acutely sensitive to their local environment (extracellular matrix, ECM) which contains both chemical and physical cues that influence cell behavior. These observations suggest that modern cell culture systems, using tissue culture polystyrene (TCP) surfaces, may fail to reproduce authentic cell behavior in vitro, resulting in "artificial outcomes." In the current study, we use bone marrow (BM)- and adipose (AD)-derived stromal cells to prepare BM-ECM and AD-ECM, which are decellularized after synthesis by the cells, to mimic the cellular niche for each of these tissues. Each ECM was characterized for its ability to affect BM- and AD-mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) proliferation, as well as proliferation of three cancer cell lines (HeLa, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231), modulate cell spreading, and direct differentiation relative to standard TCP surfaces. We found that both ECMs promoted the proliferation of MSCs, but that this effect was enhanced when the tissue-origin of the cells matched that of the ECM (i.e. BM-ECM promoted the proliferation of BM-MSCs over AD-MSCs, and vice versa). Moreover, BM- and AD-ECM were shown to preferentially direct MSC differentiation towards either osteogenic or adipogenic lineage, respectively, suggesting that the effects of the ECM were tissue-specific. Further, each ECM influenced cell morphology (i.e. circularity), irrespective of the origin of the MSCs, lending more support to the idea that effects were tissue specific. Interestingly, unlike MSCs, these ECMs did not promote the proliferation of the cancer cells. In an effort to further understand how these three culture substrates influence cell behavior, we evaluated the chemical (protein composition) and physical properties (architecture and mechanical) of the two ECMs. While many structural proteins (e.g. collagen and fibronectin) were found at equivalent levels in both BM- and AD-ECM, the architecture (i.e. fiber orientation; surface roughness) and physical properties (storage modulus, surface energy) of each were unique. These results, demonstrating differences in cell behavior when cultured on the three different substrates (BM- and AD-ECM and TCP) with differences in chemical and physical properties, provide evidence that the two ECMs may recapitulate specific elements of the native stem cell niche for bone marrow and adipose tissues. More broadly, it could be argued that ECMs, elaborated by cells ex vivo, serve as an ideal starting point for developing tissue-specific culture environments. In contrast to TCP, which relies on the "one size fits all" paradigm, native tissue-specific ECM may be a more rational model to approach engineering 3D tissue-specific culture systems to replicate the in vivo niche. We suggest that this approach will provide more meaningful information for basic research studies of cell behavior as well as cell-based therapeutics. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture; Cell microenvironment; Differentiation; Extracellular matrix; Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Niche

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26780725      PMCID: PMC5402896          DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matrix Biol        ISSN: 0945-053X            Impact factor:   11.583


  72 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular matrix provides an optimal niche for the maintenance and propagation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2010-03

2.  Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ.

Authors:  Joseph P R O Orgel; Thomas C Irving; Andrew Miller; Tim J Wess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate.

Authors:  Judith M Curran; Rui Chen; John A Hunt
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion influences on mesenchymal stem cell shape, mechanical properties, and differentiation down osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic pathways.

Authors:  Pattie S Mathieu; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Interaction of the small interstitial proteoglycans biglycan, decorin and fibromodulin with transforming growth factor beta.

Authors:  A Hildebrand; M Romarís; L M Rasmussen; D Heinegård; D R Twardzik; W A Border; E Ruoslahti
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion.

Authors:  N J Hallab; K J Bundy; K O'Connor; R L Moses; J J Jacobs
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2001-02

Review 8.  Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Matthias P Lutolf; Penney M Gilbert; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Biglycan organizes collagen VI into hexagonal-like networks resembling tissue structures.

Authors:  Charlotte Wiberg; Dick Heinegård; Christina Wenglén; Rupert Timpl; Matthias Mörgelin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Reconstruction of an in vitro tissue-specific microenvironment to rejuvenate synovium-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fan He; Xiaodong Chen; Ming Pei
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.845

View more
  27 in total

1.  Cell-secreted extracellular matrix, independent of cell source, promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human stromal vascular fraction.

Authors:  Jenna N Harvestine; Hakan Orbay; Jonathan Y Chen; David E Sahar; J Kent Leach
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.331

2.  Oral and Craniofacial Stem Cells: An Untapped Source for Neural Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Milos Marinkovic; Nicholas F Dybdal-Hargreaves; Travis J Block; David D Dean; Chih-Ko Yeh; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Tissue-engineered 3D cancer-in-bone modeling: silk and PUR protocols.

Authors:  Ushashi Dadwal; Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Sarah Linehan; Clifford J Rosen; David L Kaplan; Julie Sterling; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-10-19

4.  Cell-secreted extracellular matrix influences cellular composition sequestered from unprocessed bone marrow aspirate for osteogenic grafts.

Authors:  Jenna N Harvestine; Augustine M Saiz Jr; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.843

5.  A poly(ethylene glycol) three-dimensional bone marrow hydrogel.

Authors:  Lauren E Jansen; Hyuna Kim; Christopher L Hall; Thomas P McCarthy; Michael J Lee; Shelly R Peyton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Organ-specific extracellular matrix directs trans-differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and formation of salivary gland-like organoids in vivo.

Authors:  Olivia N Tran; Hanzhou Wang; Shengxian Li; Andrey Malakhov; Yuyang Sun; Parveez A Abdul Azees; Aaron O Gonzalez; Brian Cao; Milos Marinkovic; Brij B Singh; David D Dean; Chih-Ko Yeh; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 8.079

7.  Human perinatal stem cell derived extracellular matrix enables rapid maturation of hiPSC-CM structural and functional phenotypes.

Authors:  Travis Block; Jeffery Creech; Andre Monteiro da Rocha; Milos Marinkovic; Daniela Ponce-Balbuena; Eric N Jiménez-Vázquez; Sy Griffey; Todd J Herron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Matrix reverses immortalization-mediated stem cell fate determination.

Authors:  Yiming Wang; Gangqing Hu; Ryan C Hill; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Kirk C Hansen; Xiao-Bing Zhang; Zuoqin Yan; Ming Pei
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Regeneration enhanced in critical-sized bone defects using bone-specific extracellular matrix protein.

Authors:  Solaleh Miar; Joseph Pearson; Sergio Montelongo; Rogelio Zamilpa; Alejandro M Betancourt; Bharath Ram; Christopher Navara; Mark R Appleford; Joo L Ong; Sy Griffey; Teja Guda
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 10.  The extracellular microscape governs mesenchymal stem cell fate.

Authors:  William J Hadden; Yu Suk Choi
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.