Literature DB >> 11224924

Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion.

N J Hallab1, K J Bundy, K O'Connor, R L Moses, J J Jacobs.   

Abstract

Directed cell adhesion remains an important goal of implant and tissue engineering technology. In this study, surface energy and surface roughness were investigated to ascertain which of these properties show more overall influence on biomaterial-cell adhesion and colonization. Jet impingement was used to quantify cellular adhesion strength. Cellular proliferation and extracellular matrix secretion were used to characterize colonization of 3T3MC fibroblasts on: HS25 (a cobalt based implant alloy, ASTM F75), 316L stainless steel, Ti-6Al4V (a titanium implant alloy), commercially pure tantalum (Ta), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), silicone rubber (SR), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The metals exhibited a nearly five-fold greater adhesion strength than the polymeric materials tested. Generally, surface energy was proportional to cellular adhesion strength. Only polymeric materials demonstrated significant increased adhesion strength associated with increased surface roughness. Cellular adhesion on metals demonstrated a linear correlation with surface energy. Less than half as much cellular proliferation was detected on polymeric materials compared to the metals. However the polymers tested demonstrated greater than twice the amount of secreted extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins on a per cell basis than the metallic materials. Thus, surface energy may be a more important determinant of cell adhesion and proliferation, and may be more useful than surface roughness for directing cell adhesion and cell colonization onto engineered tissue scaffoldings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224924     DOI: 10.1089/107632700300003297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  67 in total

1.  Biointerface: protein enhanced stem cells binding to implant surface.

Authors:  W Chrzanowski; A Kondyurin; Jae Ho Lee; Megan S Lord; M M M Bilek; Hae-Won Kim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Laser processed TiN reinforced Ti6Al4V composite coatings.

Authors:  Vamsi Krishna Balla; Abhimanyu Bhat; Susmita Bose; Amit Bandyopadhyay
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-09-21

3.  In vitro blood and fibroblast responses to BisGMA-TEGDMA/bioactive glass composite implants.

Authors:  Aous A Abdulmajeed; Anne K Kokkari; Jarmo Käpylä; Jonathan Massera; Leena Hupa; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biosynthesis and characterization of a novel, biocompatible medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate by Pseudomonas mendocina CH50 using coconut oil as the carbon source.

Authors:  Pooja Basnett; Elena Marcello; Barbara Lukasiewicz; Bijal Panchal; Rinat Nigmatullin; Jonathan C Knowles; Ipsita Roy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Influence of fluoride treatment on surface properties, biodegradation and cytocompatibility of Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Ni Kong; Jialin Niu; Yongjuan Shi; Haiyan Li; Yue Zhou; Guangyin Yuan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  The influence of implant surface properties on cell adhesion and proliferation.

Authors:  V Pessková; D Kubies; H Hulejová; L Himmlová
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Rationalising the design of polymeric thermoresponsive biomaterials.

Authors:  Yu Rochev; D O'Halloran; T Gorelova; V Gilcreest; I Selezneva; B Gavrilyuk; A Gorelov
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to different treated titanium surfaces.

Authors:  L G Harris; R G Richards
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Effect of surfactant types on the biocompatibility of electrospun HAp/PHBV composite nanofibers.

Authors:  A Suslu; A Z Albayrak; A S Urkmez; E Bayir; U Cocen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Surface energy of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics driving serum protein adsorption and osteoblast adhesion.

Authors:  E A dos Santos; M Farina; G A Soares; K Anselme
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.