| Literature DB >> 26780316 |
Anna Takaoka1, Natasha Babar1, Julia Hogan1, MiJung Kim1, Marianne O Price2, Francis W Price3, Stephen L Trokel1, David C Paik1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Current literature contains scant information regarding the extent of enzymatic collagen cross-linking in the keratoconus (KC) cornea. The aim of the present study was to examine levels of enzymatic lysyl oxidase-derived cross-links in stromal collagen in KC tissue, and to correlate the cross-link levels with collagen fibril stability as determined by thermal denaturation temperature (Tm).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26780316 PMCID: PMC4727527 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Figure 1(A) Structures of important human corneal CTP di-, tri-, and tetrafunctional cross-links measured in this study. On the top line (red boxes) are the difunctional cross-links (a) DHLNL (m/z = 308.2), (b) HLNL (m/z = 292.2), and (c) LNL (m/z = 276.1). On the middle line (blue boxes) are the trifunctional cross-links (d) PYD (m/z = 429.2), (e) DPYD (m/z = 413), and (f) HHL (m/z = 445.2). On the bottom line are the age-related difunctional cross-link (green box) (g) Pent (m/z = 379.2) and the tetrafunctional elastin cross-links (yellow boxes) (h) DES (m/z = 526.3) and (i) IDE (m/z = 526.3). (B) The CTP cross-link elution profile using LC/MS overlaid extracted ion chromatograms from nine different cross-links (a–i). See Materials and Methods for details of the chromatographic separation procedure. CTP, connective tissue protein.
Summary of Analysis of KC Versus Control for All Ages Combined, Age ≤ 40 Years and > 40 Years
Figure 2Comparison of human KC versus Eye-Bank controls for (A) average Tm, (B) average tissue hydration (% water content), and (C) average collagen content (%). Black dots represent the mean values, and gray dots represent the actual values measured. In each case, comparisons were made between controls and KC by using Student's t-test. Statistically significant difference was not detected.
Figure 3(A) Levels of specific di- and trifunctional corneal CTP cross-links in samples detected by LC/MS and (B) the sum of all the cross-links detected in each groups. Black dots represent the mean values and gray dots represent the actual values measured. See Materials and Methods for procedural details. Comparisons were made between controls and KC by using Student's t-test. Statistically significant difference was detected in DHLNL and LNL levels (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Analysis of total cross-link density (mol/mol collagen) as a function of Tm for control (black circle) and KC (open circle) samples. The trend lines are expressed with a solid line (control) and a dotted line (KC). There was no statistical significant correlation between fibril stability and the cross-link density.