Orfeu M Buxton1, Anne-Marie Chang2, James C Spilsbury3, Taylor Bos4, Helene Emsellem4, Kristen L Knutson5. 1. Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, 221 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA 16802; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Kresge Building, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115; Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. 2. Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, 221 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA 16802; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. 3. Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University, Wolstein Research Building, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106-7291. 4. The Center for Sleep & Wake Disorders, 5454 Wisconsin Ave, Suite 1725, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC6076, Chicago IL 60637.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll "Sleep in the Modern Family" was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. DESIGN: Cross-sectional poll. SETTING: Internet-based interview. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n= 1103; mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. CONCLUSIONS: Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The overall objective of the 2014 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll "Sleep in the Modern Family" was to obtain a current picture of sleep in families with at least 1 school-aged child. DESIGN: Cross-sectional poll. SETTING: Internet-based interview. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative Internet panel of US households with a child 6-17 years. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary measures included parental perception of the importance of sleep, parental and child sleep quality, child sleep duration and habits, technology in bedroom, and family rules. Parents/guardians (n= 1103; mean age, 42; 54% female) completed the survey. Although the majority of parents endorsed the importance of sleep, 90% of children obtain less sleep than recommended. Significant predictors of age-adjusted sufficient sleep duration (estimated conservatively as ≥9 hours for ages 6-11 years and ≥8 hours for ages 12-17 years) included parent education, regular enforcement of rules about caffeine, and whether children left technology on in their bedroom overnight. Significant predictors of excellent sleep quality included whether a bedtime was always enforced and whether children left technology on overnight. CONCLUSIONS:Children generally have better age-appropriate sleep in the presence of household rules and regular sleep-wake routines. Sufficient sleep quantity and adequate sleep quality were protected by well-established rules of sleep hygiene (limited caffeine and regular bedtime). In contrast, sleep deficiency was more likely to be present when parents and children had electronic devices on in the bedroom after bedtime. Public health intervention goals for sleep health might focus on reducing the encroachment of technology and media into time for sleep and supporting well-known sleep hygiene principles.
Authors: Nanette Erkelenz; Susanne Kobel; Sarah Kettner; Clemens Drenowatz; Jürgen M Steinacker Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Elizabeth M Cespedes; Matthew W Gillman; Ken Kleinman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Susan Redline; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Alina I Palimaru; Ryan A Brown; Wendy M Troxel; Daniel L Dickerson; Carrie L Johnson; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2020-06-08
Authors: Heather E Gunn; Flannery O'Rourke; Ronald E Dahl; Tina R Goldstein; Dana L Rofey; Erika E Forbes; Daniel S Shaw Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2018-10-15
Authors: Babak Mokhlesi; Karla A Temple; Ashley H Tjaden; Sharon L Edelstein; Kristen J Nadeau; Tamara S Hannon; Shalini Manchanda; Susan Sam; Elena Barengolts; Kristina M Utzschneider; David A Ehrmann; Eve Van Cauter Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Knashawn H Morales; Ariel A Williamson; Nicholas Huffnagle; Allison Ludwick; Struan F A Grant; David F Dinges; Babette A Zemel Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-06-20 Impact factor: 5.012