Alina I Palimaru1, Ryan A Brown2, Wendy M Troxel2, Daniel L Dickerson3, Carrie L Johnson4, Elizabeth J D'Amico2. 1. RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: palimaru@rand.org. 2. RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Program, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Sacred Path Indigenous Wellness Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth are a high-risk group for sleep problems and associated chronic conditions. Urban AI/AN youth may face certain challenges, including specific psychosocial stressors (e.g., discrimination) and environmental factors (e.g., noise, light) that render them particularly vulnerable to poor sleep health. However, few studies have explored AI/AN adolescent sleep. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use systematic qualitative methods with AI/AN youth to explore their sleep environment and sleep behaviors. DESIGN: In-depth interviews with 26 youth. SETTING: Two urban areas in Central and Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Urban-dwelling AI/AN youth, age 12-16 years. INTERVENTION: N/A. MEASUREMENT: N/A. RESULTS: We identified five main themes, each with subthemes: sleep patterns and desired sleep, sleep barriers inside the home, environmental factors, sleep facilitators, and cultural dimensions. Key concerns discussed were poor sleep hygiene, excessive use of electronics prior to bedtime, issues with temperature regulation, and noise both within and outside the home. Parents can be an important vehicle for messaging around sleep health and for behavior management. Participating adolescents also indicated differing levels of attachment to Native identity, suggesting that culturally-targeted sleep interventions should build in openness and flexibility to a range of identity starting points. Further, we identified cultural practices, such as sweat lodges and dreamcatchers, that could be incorporated in future sleep interventions for this population. CONCLUSION: Findings increase our understanding of urban AI/AN youth's sleep environments and behaviors, thus potentially informing program development around sleep health for this vulnerable population.
OBJECTIVES: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth are a high-risk group for sleep problems and associated chronic conditions. Urban AI/AN youth may face certain challenges, including specific psychosocial stressors (e.g., discrimination) and environmental factors (e.g., noise, light) that render them particularly vulnerable to poor sleep health. However, few studies have explored AI/AN adolescent sleep. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use systematic qualitative methods with AI/AN youth to explore their sleep environment and sleep behaviors. DESIGN: In-depth interviews with 26 youth. SETTING: Two urban areas in Central and Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: Urban-dwelling AI/AN youth, age 12-16 years. INTERVENTION: N/A. MEASUREMENT: N/A. RESULTS: We identified five main themes, each with subthemes: sleep patterns and desired sleep, sleep barriers inside the home, environmental factors, sleep facilitators, and cultural dimensions. Key concerns discussed were poor sleep hygiene, excessive use of electronics prior to bedtime, issues with temperature regulation, and noise both within and outside the home. Parents can be an important vehicle for messaging around sleep health and for behavior management. Participating adolescents also indicated differing levels of attachment to Native identity, suggesting that culturally-targeted sleep interventions should build in openness and flexibility to a range of identity starting points. Further, we identified cultural practices, such as sweat lodges and dreamcatchers, that could be incorporated in future sleep interventions for this population. CONCLUSION: Findings increase our understanding of urban AI/AN youth's sleep environments and behaviors, thus potentially informing program development around sleep health for this vulnerable population.
Authors: Michael A Grandner; Natasha J Williams; Kristen L Knutson; Dorothy Roberts; Girardin Jean-Louis Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Mirja Quante; Neha Khandpur; Emily Z Kontos; Jessie P Bakker; Judith A Owens; Susan Redline Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-12-15 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Wendy M Troxel; Amy DeSantis; Andrea S Richardson; Robin Beckman; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Alvin Nugroho; Lauren Hale; Daniel J Buysse; Matthew P Buman; Tamara Dubowitz Journal: Sleep Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Elizabeth J D'Amico; Daniel L Dickerson; Ryan A Brown; Carrie L Johnson; David J Klein; Denis Agniel Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-12-28
Authors: Alina I Palimaru; Lu Dong; Ryan A Brown; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Daniel L Dickerson; Carrie L Johnson; Wendy M Troxel Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Elizabeth J D'Amico; Alina I Palimaru; Daniel L Dickerson; Lu Dong; Ryan A Brown; Carrie L Johnson; David J Klein; Wendy M Troxel Journal: Am Indian Cult Res J Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Kelli A Komro; Elizabeth J D'Amico; Daniel L Dickerson; Juli R Skinner; Carrie L Johnson; Terrence K Kominsky; Kathy Etz Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Wendy M Troxel; Alina I Palimaru; David J Klein; Lu Dong; Daniel L Dickerson; Ryan A Brown; Carrie L Johnson; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Stephanie L Mayne; Jonathan A Mitchell; Senbagam Virudachalam; Alexander G Fiks; Ariel A Williamson Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 11.401