Literature DB >> 26779304

Complete genome sequence of the potato pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum UY031.

Rodrigo Guarischi-Sousa1, Marina Puigvert2, Núria S Coll2, María Inés Siri3, María Julia Pianzzola3, Marc Valls2, João C Setubal4.   

Abstract

Ralstonia solanacearum is the causative agent of bacterial wilt of potato. Ralstonia solanacearum strain UY031 belongs to the American phylotype IIB, sequevar 1, also classified as race 3 biovar 2. Here we report the completely sequenced genome of this strain, the first complete genome for phylotype IIB, sequevar 1, and the fourth for the R. solanacearum species complex. In addition to standard genome annotation, we have carried out a curated annotation of type III effector genes, an important pathogenicity-related class of genes for this organism. We identified 60 effector genes, and observed that this effector repertoire is distinct when compared to those from other phylotype IIB strains. Eleven of the effectors appear to be nonfunctional due to disruptive mutations. We also report a methylome analysis of this genome, the first for a R. solanacearum strain. This analysis helped us note the presence of a toxin gene within a region of probable phage origin, raising the hypothesis that this gene may play a role in this strain's virulence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial plant pathogen; Bacterial wilt; Methylome; Ralstonia solanacearum; Short genome report; Uruguay

Year:  2016        PMID: 26779304      PMCID: PMC4714475          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0131-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

is the causal agent of bacterial wilt, one of the most devastating plant diseases worldwide [1]. It is a highly diversified bacterial plant pathogen in terms of host range, geographical distribution, pathogenicity, epidemiological relationships, and physiological properties [2]. Strains are divided in four phylotypes, corresponding roughly to their geographic origin: Asia (phylotype I), the Americas (II), Africa (III), and Indonesia (IV) [3]. Strain UY031 belongs to phylotype IIB, sequevar 1 (IIB1), the group considered mainly responsible for bacterial wilt of potato in cold and temperate regions [4]. Phylotype IIB, sequevar 1 is also traditionally classified as race 3 biovar 2. Strain UY031 was isolated in Uruguay from infected potato tubers in 2003 and displays high aggressiveness both on potato and tomato hosts [5]. This strain is being used as a model in plant-pathogen gene expression studies carried out by our group; having its genome available greatly facilitates the identification of pathogenicity-related genes. Four other IIB1 strains have been partially sequenced: UW551 [6], IPO1609 [7], NCPPB909 [8], and CFIA906 [8]. This is the first genome of this group to be completely sequenced, and the fourth within the species complex (the other three are strains GMI1000 [9], Po82 [10] , and PSI07 [11]).

Organism information

Classification and features

UY031 strain is classified within the order of the class . It is an aerobic, non-sporulating, Gram-negative bacterium with rod-shaped cells ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 μm in length (Fig. 1, (a) and (b)). The strain is moderately fast-growing, forming 3–4 mm colonies within 2–3 days at 28 °C. On a general nutrient medium containing tetrazolium chloride and high glucose content, strain UY031 usually produces a diffusible brown pigment and develops pearly cream-white, flat, irregular, and fluidal colonies with characteristic pink whorls in the centre (Fig. 1, (c)). Strain UY031 was isolated from a naturally infected potato tuber showing typical brown rot symptoms (creamy exudates from the vascular rings and eyes of the tuber). This strain is highly pathogenic in different solanaceous hosts including important crops like tomato and potato [5]. Pathogenicity of this strain was also confirmed in several accessions of Dunal, a wild species considered as a valuable source of resistance for potato breeding. Due to its great aggressiveness, strain UY031 is being used for selection of resistant germplasm as part of the potato breeding program developed in Uruguay. This strain has been deposited in the CFBP collection of plant-associated bacteria, and has received code CFBP 8401. Minimum Information about the Genome Sequence of strain UY031 is summarized in Table 1, and a phylogenetic tree is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 1

Images of Ralstonia solanacearum strain UY031 using transmission (a) and scanning (b) electron microscopy, as well as light microscopy to visualize colony morphology on solid media (c)

Table 1

Classification and general features of Ralstonia solanacearum strain UY031according to the MIGS recommendations [27]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain BacteriaTAS [28]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [29]
Class Betaproteobacteria TAS [30, 31]
Order Burkholderiales TAS [31, 32]
Family Burkholderiaceae TAS [31, 33]
Genus Ralstonia TAS [34, 35]
Species Ralstonia solanacearum TAS [34, 35]
Strain UY031
Gram stainNegativeIDA
Cell shapeRodIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationNon sporulatingNAS
Temperature rangeMesophileIDA
Optimum temperature27 °CIDA
pH range; Optimum5.5 – 8.0; 6.5NAS
Carbon sourceDextrose, lactose, maltose, cellobioseIDA
MIGS-6Habitatpotato plants, soilTAS [5]
MIGS-6.3Salinity<2.0 %TAS [36]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicIDA
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingIDA
MIGS-14PathogenicityPathogenicTAS [5]
MIGS-4Geographic locationUruguay, San JoséTAS [5]
MIGS-5Sample collection2003TAS [5]
MIGS-4.1Latitude34°43′58.17”SNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude56°32′2.87”WNAS
MIGS-4.4Altitude116.7 mNAS

aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from direct assay, TAS Traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37]

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of the Ralstonia solanacearum UY031 (shown in bold) relative to other strains from the same species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using four conserved prokaryotic marker genes, namely: recA, rpoA, rpoB and rpoC. Each gene was aligned individually with MUSCLE [25]; the resulting multiple alignments were concatenated. PhyML [26] was used to perform tree reconstruction using the GTR model and 1,000 bootstrap replicas. Strain names are colour-coded according to the correspondent phylotype. GenBank accession numbers are displayed within brackets. Strains whose genome was completely sequenced are marked with an asterisk. Ralstonia pickettii 12 J (NCBI accession NC_010682) was used as an outgroup

Images of Ralstonia solanacearum strain UY031 using transmission (a) and scanning (b) electron microscopy, as well as light microscopy to visualize colony morphology on solid media (c) Classification and general features of Ralstonia solanacearum strain UY031according to the MIGS recommendations [27] aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from direct assay, TAS Traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37] Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of the Ralstonia solanacearum UY031 (shown in bold) relative to other strains from the same species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using four conserved prokaryotic marker genes, namely: recA, rpoA, rpoB and rpoC. Each gene was aligned individually with MUSCLE [25]; the resulting multiple alignments were concatenated. PhyML [26] was used to perform tree reconstruction using the GTR model and 1,000 bootstrap replicas. Strain names are colour-coded according to the correspondent phylotype. GenBank accession numbers are displayed within brackets. Strains whose genome was completely sequenced are marked with an asterisk. Ralstonia pickettii 12 J (NCBI accession NC_010682) was used as an outgroup

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This sequencing project was carried out in 2015; the result is a complete and finished genome. Project data is available from GenBank (Table 2). Accession codes for reads in the Sequence Read Archive are SRP064191, SRR2518086, and SRZ132405.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityFinished
MIGS-28Libraries usedSMRT library (P5-C3 large insert library)
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsPacBio RS II
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage138×
MIGS 30AssemblersHGAP.2 workflow
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProkka v1.10 (ncRNAs search enabled)
Locus tagRSUY
Genbank IDCP012687 (chr), CP012688 (pl)
GenBank date of releaseSeptember 28, 2015
GOLD IDNA
BIOPROJECTPRJNA278086
MIGS 13Source material identifierSAMN03402637
Project relevancePlant pathogen
Project information Summary of genome: one chromosome and one plasmid

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

strain UY031 was routinely grown in rich B medium (10 g/l bactopeptone, 1 g/l yeast extract and 1 g/l casaminoacids). Genomic DNA was extracted from a bacterial culture grown to stationary phase to avoid over-representation of genomic sequences close to the origin of replication. Twelve ml of a culture grown for 16 h at 30 °C and shaking at 200 rpm (OD600 = 0.87) were used to extract DNA with Blood & Cell Culture DNA Midi kit (Qiagen), following manufacturer’s instructions for gram-negative bacteria. DNA concentration and quality were measured in a Nanodrop (ND-8000 8-sample spectrophotometer).

Genome sequencing and assembly

Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the PacBio RS II platform at the Duke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology (USA). P5-C3 chemistry and a single SMRTcell were used, and quality control was performed with DUGSIM. The number of Pre-Filter Polymerase Read Bases was greater than 749 million (>130x genome coverage). Reads were assembled using RS_HGAP_Assembly.2 protocol from SMRT Analysis 2.3 [12]. This resulted in one circular chromosome (3,412,138 bp) and one circular megaplasmid (1,999,545 bp). These lengths are very similar to those of the corresponding replicons in Po82, a IIB sequevar 4 strain, also a potato pathogen and which has also been completely sequenced [10]. The origin of replication was defined for both replicons based on the putative origin for reference strain GMI1000 [9]. An assembly quality assessment was performed before all downstream analyses. All reads were mapped back to the assembled sequences using RS_Resequencing.1 protocol from SMRT Analysis 2.3. This analysis revealed that chromosome and megaplasmid sequences had 100 % of bases called (percentage of assembled sequence with coverage > = 1) and 99.9999 % and 99.9992 %, respectively, of consensus concordance.

Genome annotation

Genome annotation was done using Prokka [13] with the option for ncRNA search. Type III effectors of strain UY031 were identified and annotated in three steps: First, 17 of the T3Es from the species complex [14] were identified based on the Prokka annotations. Second, the 15 T3Es annotated as “Type III Effector Protein”, “Probable Type III Effector Protein” or “Putative Type III Effector Protein” by Prokka were manually annotated using the first BLAST [15] hits (usually 100 % identity) of their DNA sequences against genome sequences of phylotype IIB strains MOLK2 and Po82. Third, the UY031 genome was uploaded to the “ T3E” web interface tool [14] to search for additional T3Es not annotated as such with Prokka. The additional 28 T3E genes identified were manually annotated as above. Homologous Gene Group clustering was performed with get_homologues [16] using the orthoMCL program [17] and requiring a minimum sequence identity in BLAST query/subject pairs of 30 %. The sequencing plataform used to assemble the genome (PacBio RS II) also gives kinectics information about the sequenced genome. The presence of a methylated base in the DNA template delays the incorporation of the complementary nucleotide; such modifications in the kinectics may be used to characterize modified bases by methylation including: 6-mA, 5-mC and 4-mC [18]. The analysis of these modifications in a genome-wide and single-base-resolution scale allowed us to characterize the ‘methylome’ of this strain. These epigenetic marks are commonly used by bacteria, and its implications vary from a defense mechanism, protecting the cell from invading bacteriophages or other foreign DNA, to the bacterial virulence itself [19-21]. We performed methylome analysis and motif detection using RS_Modification_and_Motif_analysis.1 protocol from SMRT Analysis 2.3. Such epigenetic marks arise from DNA methyl-transferases, sometimes coupled with a restriction endonuclease (a Restriction-Modification System). We further characterized which genes give rise to the modified motifs using tools available at REBASE [22].

Genome properties

The genome of strain UY031 has one chromosome (3,412,138 bp) and one circular megaplasmid (1,999,545 bp) (Table 3). The average GC content of the chromosome is 66.5 % while that of the megaplasmid is 66.7 %. A total of 4,778 genes (4,683 CDSs and 95 RNAs) were predicted. Of the protein-coding genes, 3,566 (76.1 %) had functions assigned while 1,212 were considered hypothetical (Table 4). Of all CDSs, 76.6 % could be assigned to one COG functional category and for 83.1 % one or more conserved PFAM-A domains were identified (Table 5).
Fig. 3

Venn diagram of the Ralstonia solanacearum homologous gene groups. The R. solanacearum genomes compared were as follows: strains Po82, GMI1000, IPO1609, UW551, and UY031

Table 4

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of total
Genome size (bp)5,411,683100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,737,27487.5
DNA G + C (bp)3,604,48766.6
DNA scaffolds2100.00
Total genes4,778100.00
Protein coding genes4,68398.0
RNA genes951.9
Pseudo genesNANA
Genes in internal clustersNANA
Genes with function prediction3,56674.6
Genes assigned to COGs3,58676.6
Genes with Pfam domains3,89283.1
Genes with signal peptides50110.6
Genes with transmembrane helices113224.1
CRISPR repeats0-
Table 5

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%Description
J1603.4Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A2<0.1RNA processing and modification
K2735.8Transcription
L2405.1Replication, recombination and repair
B3<0.1Chromatin structure and dynamics
D280.6Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V451.0Defense mechanisms
T1623.5Signal transduction mechanisms
M2375.1Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N1192.5Cell motility
U611.3Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1543.3Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2264.8Energy production and conversion
G1653.5Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E3427.3Amino acid transport and metabolism
F751.6Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1543.3Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1773.8Lipid transport and metabolism
P1763.8Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q731.6Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3527.5General function prediction only
S3627.7Function unknown
-109723.4Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

We performed a pan-genome analysis of the UY031 genome, comparing it to four other genomes: two closely-related strains (UW551 and IPO1609) and two others with complete genome sequences available (GMI1000 and Po82). The pan-genome consists of 7,594 HGGs while the core genome consists of 2,958 HGGs; the variable genome consists of 2,643 HGGs, and the number of strain-specific HGGs ranges from 193 to 774 (Fig. 3). We identified 193 HGGs that are UY031-specific; 75.1 % of them were annotated as hypothetical proteins. Venn diagram of the Ralstonia solanacearum homologous gene groups. The R. solanacearum genomes compared were as follows: strains Po82, GMI1000, IPO1609, UW551, and UY031 Type III effector genes are among the most important for virulence determinants in bacterial plant pathogens such as [14]. Based on comparisons with effector gene sequences in public databases (see above) we have identified 60 T3Es (Table 6), of which 11 appear to be nonfunctional due to frameshifts or other mutations that disrupt the coding sequence. For example, the effector RipS5 is encoded by a gene that has been clearly interrupted by a 34 kbp prophage. Table 6 also shows the orthologs of these genes in the related strains GMI1000, Po82, IPO1609, and UW551. In the table it can be seen that the genes that code for RipAA and RipAR have frameshifts or truncations in strain UY031 only. The absence of a particular effector may be enough for a pathogen to avoid host defenses, and therefore cause disease. These two genes are therefore a good starting point for additional investigations of phenotypic differences between these strains. Other effector genes of interest are those that are present and do not have disrupting mutations in UY031 but are absent or appear to be nonfunctional in other strains. We have found several such cases (Table 6), but in all cases there is at least one other strain that also has the same gene in what appears to be a functional state.
Table 6

List of T3E genes identified in R. solanacearum UY031 genome and their orthologs

Former effector nameNew effector namea UY031(RSUY_)GM1000(RS)Po82(RSPO_)IPO1609(RSIPO_)UW551(RRSL_)
AWR2RipA232720p0099m000800316903418
AWR3RipA340320p0846m0116503901 + 05027b -
AWR4RipA440330/40b p0847m01166b 03902/3b -
AWR5RipA5_141860p1024m01289/90b 0404901071
AWR5RipA5_219780-c018210128100546
Rip2RipB30390c0245c031610026302573
Rip62RipC142590p1239m013710412303371
Rip34RipD33840p0304m015200448400947
Rip26RipE101190c3369c000700308300852
-RipE235100-c025130435303923
PopF1RipF1_145370p1555m015410340304777
PopF2RipF245510-m0155705028/9b 04764
Gala2RipG238790p0672m010070489202264
Gala3RipG332420p0028m000350320200752
Gala4RipG419910c1800c0183501266/68b 00532
Gala5RipG519920c1801c018360126400531
Gala6RipG617940c1356c019990146301561
Gala7RipG717950c1357c019980146201562
HLK1RipH119380c1386c018460131900426
HLK2RipH235470p0215m00201/2c 0431703559
HLK3RipH333320p0160m001570310500041b
Rip1RipI00490 + 32050b c0041c0331900098b 02976 + 02040b
Rip22RipJ24610b c2132c02749--
Rip16RipM19180c1475c01871/2/301339 + 05024b 00705
Rip58RipN43290p1130m008690418404736
Rip35RipO134050p0323m014960446300926
Rip63RipQ44390b p1277m0071704287b 02855b
PopSRipR42640p1281m013760412703375
SKWP1RipS100860c3401c000360001704182
SKWP2RipS244630p1374m0069004310-
SKWP3RipS341210p0930m0122903993/4b 00237b
SKWP5RipS510370 + 10840b p0296c02546b --
SKWP7RipS735110b -m0038304352b 03921
Rip59RipU43920p1212m008050424304660
Rip12RipV117880c1349c020060147001554
-RipV219160b -c01875/76b 0134100703
PopWRipW07010c2775c007350252402682
PopARipX40640p0877m011960393302443
Rip3RipY30260c0257c031530027601439
Rip57RipZ42040p1031m013120406700271b
AvrARipAA26380b c0608c027480065901581
PopBRipAB40630p0876m011950393202442
PopCRipAC40620p0875m011940393102441
Rip72ripAD45790p1601m015850336402518
Rip4RipAE29570c0321c030850034301625
Rip41RipAI40230p0838m011560389401021
Rip21RipAJ13300c2101c013320489301260
Rip38RipAL39210b -m01053-02221
Brg40RipAM02270c3272c001910296802810
Rip43RipAN40310p0845m011640390001013
Rip50RipAO40750p0879m012060394403105
Rip60RipAP43960p1215b m008000424704655
Rip51RipAQ40810p0885-0395103113
Rip61RipAR44220b p1236m007700427001136
Rip39RipAV39280p0732m01061-02213
Brg13RipAX102040c3290m0122102991-
Rip55RipAY41810p1022m012830404601066
-RipBH45880-m016000335500782
-RipBI45200b -m007180341900326
-RipTPS39290p0731m01062b -02212

aAccording to Peeters et al. [14]; b: these genes appear to be nonfunctional due to various reasons (frameshift, truncation, etc.); genes in other columns that appear in the form locus tag x + locus tag y are genes which also appear to be nonfunctional due to frameshifts. c:this gene is duplicated

List of T3E genes identified in R. solanacearum UY031 genome and their orthologs aAccording to Peeters et al. [14]; b: these genes appear to be nonfunctional due to various reasons (frameshift, truncation, etc.); genes in other columns that appear in the form locus tag x + locus tag y are genes which also appear to be nonfunctional due to frameshifts. c:this gene is duplicated Our modification analysis revealed two motifs that are essentially always methylated, namely: CAACRAC and GTWWAC. Both are fairly frequent in the genome, occurring respectively 2144 and 716 times. Motif CAACRAC is associated with the product of gene RSUY_11320 (R. Roberts, personal communication), which is hypothesized to be an enzyme of the Restriction-Modification System, with a restriction nuclease and a DNA methyltransferase role. This gene does not have homologs in other strains and is located close to a region containing phage-related genes. This region contains gene RSUY_11410, which has been annotated as encoding a zonular occludens toxin. The provenance of this annotation is an enterotoxin gene found in cholera [23]; in the role of this toxin gene is still unclear [24]. Motif GTWWAC is probably associated with the product of gene RSUY_22890 (R. Roberts, personal communication), which is hypothesized to be a solitary DNA methyltransferase (no restriction endonuclease linked). This gene does have homologs in other strains (GMI1000, IPO1609, Po82 and PSI07). To our knowledge this is the first genome with a methylome profile available.

Conclusions

The complete sequence of UY031 strain presented here should provide a rich platform upon which additional plant-pathogen studies can be carried out. Even though this is the fifth phylotype IIB1 sequenced, we found many differences with respect to the genomes of the other strains. In particular, the repertoire of T3E genes has many variations among these strains, and this may help explain some of the most relevant pathogenicity-related phenotypes described in the literature, opening the way to new control methods for bacterial wilt.
Table 3

Summary of genome: one chromosome and one plasmid

LabelSize (Mb)TopologyINSDC identifierRefSeq ID
Chromosome3.41circularNANA
Megaplasmid1.99circularNANA
  29 in total

1.  DNA adenine methylase mutants of Salmonella typhimurium show defects in protein secretion, cell invasion, and M cell cytotoxicity.

Authors:  F García-Del Portillo; M G Pucciarelli; J Casadesús
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genome sequence of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum.

Authors:  M Salanoubat; S Genin; F Artiguenave; J Gouzy; S Mangenot; M Arlat; A Billault; P Brottier; J C Camus; L Cattolico; M Chandler; N Choisne; C Claudel-Renard; S Cunnac; N Demange; C Gaspin; M Lavie; A Moisan; C Robert; W Saurin; T Schiex; P Siguier; P Thébault; M Whalen; P Wincker; M Levy; J Weissenbach; C A Boucher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An essential role for DNA adenine methylation in bacterial virulence.

Authors:  D M Heithoff; R L Sinsheimer; D A Low; M J Mahan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology.

Authors:  John Mansfield; Stephane Genin; Shimpei Magori; Vitaly Citovsky; Malinee Sriariyanum; Pamela Ronald; Max Dow; Valérie Verdier; Steven V Beer; Marcos A Machado; Ian Toth; George Salmond; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.663

5.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; David H Alexander; Patrick Marks; Aaron A Klammer; James Drake; Cheryl Heiner; Alicia Clum; Alex Copeland; John Huddleston; Evan E Eichler; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Genomes of three tomato pathogens within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex reveal significant evolutionary divergence.

Authors:  Benoît Remenant; Bénédicte Coupat-Goutaland; Alice Guidot; Gilles Cellier; Emmanuel Wicker; Caitilyn Allen; Mark Fegan; Olivier Pruvost; Mounira Elbaz; Alexandra Calteau; Gregory Salvignol; Damien Mornico; Sophie Mangenot; Valérie Barbe; Claudine Médigue; Philippe Prior
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Global diversity and distribution of prophages are lineage-specific within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex.

Authors:  Samuel T E Greenrod; Martina Stoycheva; John Elphinstone; Ville-Petri Friman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.547

2.  Plant pathogenic bacterium can rapidly evolve tolerance to an antimicrobial plant allelochemical.

Authors:  Carrie Louise Alderley; Samuel Terrence Edwards Greenrod; Ville-Petri Friman
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Comprehensive Analysis Reveals the Genetic and Pathogenic Diversity of Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex and Benefits Its Taxonomic Classification.

Authors:  Ruimei Geng; Lirui Cheng; Changdai Cao; Zhengwen Liu; Dan Liu; Zhiliang Xiao; Xiuming Wu; Zhenrui Huang; Quanfu Feng; Chenggang Luo; Zhiqiang Chen; Zhenchen Zhang; Caihong Jiang; Min Ren; Aiguo Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Complete genome sequence of the sesame pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum strain SEPPX 05.

Authors:  Xinshen Li; Xiaomei Huang; Gongyou Chen; Lifang Zou; Lingen Wei; Juling Hua
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.839

5.  Light modulates important physiological features of Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum during the colonization of tomato plants.

Authors:  Josefina Tano; María Belén Ripa; María Laura Tondo; Analía Carrau; Silvana Petrocelli; María Victoria Rodriguez; Virginia Ferreira; María Inés Siri; Laura Piskulic; Elena Graciela Orellano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  HpaB-Dependent Secretion of Type III Effectors in the Plant Pathogens Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria.

Authors:  Fabien Lonjon; David Lohou; Anne-Claire Cazalé; Daniela Büttner; Barbara Gomes Ribeiro; Claire Péanne; Stéphane Genin; Fabienne Vailleau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Genome Sequencing of Ralstonia solanacearum CQPS-1, a Phylotype I Strain Collected from a Highland Area with Continuous Cropping of Tobacco.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Yuanman Tang; Xiyun Qin; Liang Yang; Gaofei Jiang; Shili Li; Wei Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Three Draft Genome Sequences of the Bacterial Plant Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, Isolated in Georgia.

Authors:  Adam Kotorashvili; Galina Meparishvili; Giorgi Gogoladze; Nato Kotaria; Maka Muradashvili; Maia Zarandia; Daviti Tsaguria
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-06-08

9.  Comparative Analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum Methylomes.

Authors:  Ivan Erill; Marina Puigvert; Ludovic Legrand; Rodrigo Guarischi-Sousa; Céline Vandecasteele; João C Setubal; Stephane Genin; Alice Guidot; Marc Valls
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Interspecific Potato Breeding Lines Display Differential Colonization Patterns and Induced Defense Responses after Ralstonia solanacearum Infection.

Authors:  Virginia Ferreira; María J Pianzzola; Francisco L Vilaró; Guillermo A Galván; María L Tondo; María V Rodriguez; Elena G Orellano; Marc Valls; María I Siri
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.