Literature DB >> 26777757

Preoperative Determinants of Quality of Life and Functional Capacity Response to Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Michael S Kiernan1, Kartik S Sundareswaran2, Duc Thinh Pham3, Navin K Kapur4, Naveen L Pereira5, Martin Strueber6, David J Farrar2, David DeNofrio4, Joseph G Rogers7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival, quality of life (QOL), and functional capacity (FC) among patients with end-stage heart failure. Few data are available regarding characteristics associated with QOL and FC response. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients enrolled in the Heartmate II clinical trials that were alive with ongoing LVAD support at 6 months were included. QOL response criteria included scoring above the lowest quartile on either the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire or the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. FC responder criteria included improvement in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) >70 meters from baseline, a 6MWD >220 meters at 6 months, or New York Heart Association functional class I or II. Independent variables associated with QOL nonresponse included history of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.78), lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99), or a Heartmate II right ventricular risk score >2 (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.00-3.12). Variables associated with FC nonresponse included history of COPD (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.22-3.03) or diabetes (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.01-2.27). Compared with responders, QOL and FC nonresponders had reduced long-term survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative comorbidities, including diabetes, COPD, and right heart failure, may limit the QOL and FC response to LVAD therapy and should be considered during the shared decision-making process.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Left ventricular assist device; exercise tolerance; functional capacity; heart failure; predictors; quality of life; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26777757     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  12 in total

1.  A longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life in rural and urban recipients of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Windy W Alonso; Kenneth M Faulkner; Bunny J Pozehl; Judith E Hupcey; Lisa A Kitko; Christopher S Lee
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 2.  Clinical Outcomes, Trends in Weight, and Weight Loss Strategies in Patients With Obesity After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Naga Vaishnavi Gadela; Devika Umashanker; Andrew Scatola; Abhishek Jaiswal
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-01-09

3.  Starting the Conversation about Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Leslie L Davis; Ana Nino Combs
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 0.767

Review 4.  Patient Selection for Destination LVAD Therapy: Predicting Success in the Short and Long Term.

Authors:  Alexander Michaels; Jennifer Cowger
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-10

5.  Contrast Ultrasound Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Recruitable Perfusion after Permanent Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Implications for Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Divya Soman; James Hodovan; Conrad J Macon; Brian P Davidson; J Todd Belcik; James O Mudd; Byung S Park; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 7.722

6.  Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Michael S Kiernan; E Wilson Grandin; Marshall Brinkley; Navin K Kapur; Duc Thinh Pham; Robin Ruthazer; J Eduardo Rame; Pavan Atluri; Edo Y Birati; Guilherme H Oliveira; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; David Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 7.  A right ventricular state of mind in the progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: implications for left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Ersilia M DeFilippis; Marco Guazzi; Paolo C Colombo; Melana Yuzefpolskaya
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Right ventricular systolic function is associated with health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in community-dwelling populations.

Authors:  Yong-Tai Liu; Jin-Zhi Lai; Fei-Fei Zhai; Fei Han; Li-Xin Zhou; Jun Ni; Ming Yao; Zhuang Tian; Yan-Lin Zhu; Wei Chen; Hua Bai; Hui Wang; Ding-Ding Zhang; Li-Ying Cui; Zheng-Yu Jin; Yi-Cheng Zhu; Shu-Yang Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

9.  Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Recovery for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Djordje G Jakovljevic; Magdi H Yacoub; Stephan Schueler; Guy A MacGowan; Lazar Velicki; Petar M Seferovic; Sandeep Hothi; Bing-Hsiean Tzeng; David A Brodie; Emma Birks; Lip-Bun Tan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Abdominal skeletal muscle mass as a predictor of mortality in Japanese patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Masaki Tsuji; Eisuke Amiya; Masaru Hatano; Daisuke Nitta; Hisataka Maki; Chie Bujo; Akihito Saito; Yumiko Hosoya; Shun Minatsuki; Toru Hara; Mariko Nemoto; Yukie Kagami; Miyoko Endo; Mitsutoshi Kimura; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Hiroyuki Morita; Minoru Ono; Issei Komuro
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.