Literature DB >> 26777602

Detection of subclinical keratoconus through non-contact tonometry and the use of discriminant biomechanical functions.

Pablo Peña-García1, Cristina Peris-Martínez2, Alessandro Abbouda3, José M Ruiz-Moreno4.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to develop a discriminant function departing from the biomechanical parameters provided by a non-contact tonometer (Corvis-ST, Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) to distinguish subclinical keratoconus from normal eyes. 212 eyes (120 patients) were divided in two groups: 184 healthy eyes of 92 patients aged 32.99 ± 7.85 (21-73 years) and 28 eyes of 28 patients aged 37.79 ± 14.21 (17-75 years) with subclinical keratoconus. The main outcome measures were age, sex, intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal central thickness (CCT) and other specific biomechanical parameters provided by the tonometer. Correlations between all biomechanical parameters and the rest of variables were evaluated. The biomechanical measures were corrected in IOP and CCT (since these variable are not directly related with the corneal structure and biomechanical behavior) to warrant an accurate comparison between both types of eyes. Two discriminant functions were created from the set of corrected variables. The best discriminant function created depended on three parameters: maximum Deformation Amplitude (corrected in IOP and CCT), First Applanation time (corrected in CCT) and CCT. Statistically significant differences were found between groups for this function (p=2·10(-10); Mann-Withney test). The area under the Receiving Operating Characteristic was 0.893 ± 0.028 (95% confidence interval 0.838-0.949). Sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 82.07% respectively. These results show that the use of biomechanical parameters provided by non-contact tonometry, previous normalization, combined with the theory of discriminant functions is a useful tool for the detection of subclinical keratoconus.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal biomechanics; Discriminant functions; Subclinical keratoconus; Tonometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26777602     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  [Evaluation of corneal biomechanics in keratoconus using dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug measurements].

Authors:  S Brettl; P Franko Zeitz; T A Fuchsluger
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure and Other Biomechanical Parameters to Distinguish between Subclinical Keratoconus and Healthy Corneas.

Authors:  Cristina Peris-Martínez; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; María Carmen García-Domene; María Dolores Pinazo-Durán; María José Luque-Cobija; María Ángeles Del Buey-Sayas; Susana Ortí-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Analysis of the VSX1 gene in sporadic keratoconus patients from China.

Authors:  Tao Guan; Xue Wang; Li-Bin Zheng; Hai-Jian Wu; Yu-Feng Yao
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Corneal Biomechanics in Ectatic Diseases: Refractive Surgery Implications.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Fernando Faria Correia; Bernardo Lopes; Marcella Q Salomão; Allan Luz; Daniel G Dawson; Ahmed Elsheikh; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-07-31

5.  In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus.

Authors:  Ying Hon; Guo-Zhen Chen; Shu-Hao Lu; David Cc Lam; Andrew Kc Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  High myopia induced by form deprivation is associated with altered corneal biomechanical properties in chicks.

Authors:  Byung Soo Kang; Li-Ke Wang; Yong-Ping Zheng; Jeremy A Guggenheim; William K Stell; Chea-Su Kee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Advances in Biomechanical Parameters for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part III.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Collagen Crosslinking in Diabetes and Keratoconus.

Authors:  Tina B McKay; Shrestha Priyadarsini; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Dynamic corneal deformation response and integrated corneal tomography.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Fernando Faria-Correia; Bernardo Teixeira Lopes; Sandra Rodrigues-Barros; Cynthia J Roberts; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Bernardo Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Jens Bühren; Nelson Sena; Guilherme Simões Luz Hilgert; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.