Literature DB >> 26777549

Factors Affecting Wear of Constrained Polyethylene Tibial Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Hee-Nee Pang1, Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak2, Paul Jamieson3, Matthew G Teeter3, Douglas D R Naudie3, Steven J MacDonald3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wear in posterior-stabilized (PS) polyethylene tibial inserts depends on component position, limb alignment, and ligament balancing. Valgus-varus constrained (VVC) inserts are likely to be affected similarly. We aimed to compare wear characteristics of VVC and PS inserts and identify associated factors.
METHODS: This was a retrieval analysis (macroscopic and radiographic) of all 18 VVC liners collected from patients who underwent revision surgery from 1999 to 2011. These patients were matched to another group with PS inserts who underwent revision in the same time period.
RESULTS: There was significantly more damage in the posts of the VVC group (13.0 ± 5.0, compared to 4.7 ± 1.9 in the PS group; P < .001). Within the VVC group, the total damage score and cold flow damage were significantly higher with excessive joint line changes (≥5 mm; P = .01). The excessive joint line elevation was associated with rotational wear pattern of the post (P = .004). Damage scores were increased with femoral component malposition (P = .04), anterior tibial slope (P = .04), and tibial component malposition (P = .04).
CONCLUSION: Joint line elevation, femoral and tibial component malposition, and anterior tibial slope resulted in significantly more wear in the VVC inserts. Joint line elevation of >5 mm resulted in wear of the medial and lateral aspects of the post, femoral valgus resulted in cold flow wear of the anterior post, and tibial valgus and anterior slope resulted in wear of lateral aspect of the post.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PE; VVC; constrained; polyethylene; revision; wear

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26777549     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  Factors affecting the choice of constrained prostheses when performing revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cheol Hee Park; Jung Kwon Bae; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Johannes Cip; Elmira Rad; Michel P Laurent; Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  3D patient imaging and retrieval analysis help understand the clinical importance of rotation in knee replacements.

Authors:  Arianna Cerquiglini; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Niccoló Rotigliano; Michael T Hirschmann; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of constraint on post damage in total knee arthroplasty: posterior stabilized vs posterior stabilized constrained inserts.

Authors:  Joseph Konopka; Lydia Weitzler; Daniel Westrich; Timothy M Wright; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-12-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.