BACKGROUND: Prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains poorly assessed. The aims of this study were to describe the oncological results of PD in DCC and to compare its prognosis to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: All PD for periampullary carcinoma performed between January 2000 and March 2013 were extracted from a prospective database. Risk factors likely to influence overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survivals of DCC were assessed by multivariable analyses. The DCC and PDAC prognoses were compared after matching using propensity score (nearest neighbor matching). RESULTS: Of the 290 patients analyzed, 56 had DCC, with a mean age of 65 ± 15 years. The median OS was 36.9 months. Recurrence occurred in 35 patients (67%), mostly in the liver (37%). The median DFS was 14.6 months. Combined organ resection was an independent risk factor for worse OS and DFS (P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively). Matching analysis found no significant difference between DCC and PDAC in terms of OS (P = 0.284) or DFS (P = 0.438). CONCLUSION: This first propensity analysis demonstrated that DCC and PDAC have the same prognosis, linked to the high rate of early recurrence, particularly associated with the need for combined organ resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:575-580.
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains poorly assessed. The aims of this study were to describe the oncological results of PD in DCC and to compare its prognosis to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: All PD for periampullary carcinoma performed between January 2000 and March 2013 were extracted from a prospective database. Risk factors likely to influence overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survivals of DCC were assessed by multivariable analyses. The DCC and PDAC prognoses were compared after matching using propensity score (nearest neighbor matching). RESULTS: Of the 290 patients analyzed, 56 had DCC, with a mean age of 65 ± 15 years. The median OS was 36.9 months. Recurrence occurred in 35 patients (67%), mostly in the liver (37%). The median DFS was 14.6 months. Combined organ resection was an independent risk factor for worse OS and DFS (P = 0.01 and P = 0.001, respectively). Matching analysis found no significant difference between DCC and PDAC in terms of OS (P = 0.284) or DFS (P = 0.438). CONCLUSION: This first propensity analysis demonstrated that DCC and PDAC have the same prognosis, linked to the high rate of early recurrence, particularly associated with the need for combined organ resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:575-580.
Authors: Ekaterina Petrova; Felix Rückert; Sebastian Zach; YinFeng Shen; Jürgen Weitz; Robert Grützmann; Uwe A Wittel; Frank Makowiec; Ulrich T Hopt; Peter Bronsert; Florian Kühn; Bettina M Rau; Roman E Izrailov; Igor E Khatkov; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Louisa Bolm; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck; Ulrich F Wellner; Gabriel Seifert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lauren M Postlewait; Cecilia G Ethun; Nina Le; Timothy M Pawlik; Stefan Buettner; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Kenneth Cardona; Shishir K Maithel Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Johannes Byrling; Roland Andersson; Agata Sasor; Gert Lindell; Daniel Ansari; Johan Nilsson; Bodil Andersson Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2017-06-20
Authors: Oliver Beetz; Michael Klein; Harald Schrem; Jill Gwiasda; Florian W R Vondran; Felix Oldhafer; Sebastian Cammann; Jürgen Klempnauer; Karl J Oldhafer; Moritz Kleine Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.102