| Literature DB >> 26776367 |
Chieh-Shou Su1,2, Hui-Chin Lai1,3, Chih-Yen Wang1, Wen-Lieng Lee1,3, Kuo-Yang Wang1,4, Ya-Ling Yang1, Li-Chun Wang1, Chia-Ning Liu1, Tsun-Jui Liu5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation of laboratory mice remains essential yet challenging for most researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this procedure can be more efficiently and safely accomplished by a novel method using slim and torqueable guidewires to guide access to the trachea.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26776367 PMCID: PMC4716634 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0173-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Fig. 1Equipment for the orotracheal intubation of laboratory mice. a tissue forceps acting as a laryngeal blade. b 22-G intravenous catheter. c 38-mm long, sharp tip-blunted needle stylet with a 30-mm hub. d 0.014-inch (0.36 mm) guide wire. e Guide wire-manipulating torque device
Fig. 2Animal placement for tracheal intubation. Panel a, the mouse was placed in the dorsal recumbent position on a specially-designed platform (30 × 20 cm) with the upper incisors hooked and fixed by a silk band on the proximal end of the platform. Panel b, the platform angle was adjusted to an angle of 45-60° to help straighten the curvature between the trachea and the larynx to enable clear visualization of the oropharyngeal cavity and facilitate tracheal intubation
Fig. 3Illustration of a mouse’s oral cavity from the operator’s viewpoint. Panel a, the mouth was opened using angulated tissue forceps (forceps 2) and the tongue was pulled laterally with smooth forceps (forceps 1). A 100-W halogen light source with a flexible fiber-optic arm was aimed at the ventral side of the mouse’s neck to illuminate the trachea. Panel b, the oral cavity and the vocal cords were clearly transilluminated by the 100-W halogen light source. Left upper diagram, magnification of the laryngopharynx showing details of the orolaryngopharyngeal apparatus
Baseline data and procedural characteristics of orotracheal intubation in both groups of mice
| Conventional group | Modified group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number, n | 42 | 50 | - |
| Body weight (g) | 25.40 ± 1.50 | 25.24 ± 1.51 | 0.602 |
| Endotracheal intubation time (minutes) | 2.17 ± 0.26 | 1.73 ± 0.18 | <0.001 |
| Intubation attempt(s) | 1.33 ± 0.6 | 1 ± 0 | 0.001 |
| Success rate (%) | 42 (100) | 50 (100) | NS |
| Difficulties met during intubation | |||
| Overall (%) | 7 (16.7)a | 0 (0) | 0.009 |
| Vigorous gag reflex (%) | 4 (9.5) | 0 (0) | 0.086 |
| Salivary secretion (%) | 5 (11.9) | 0 (0) | 0.041 |
| Resistance on advancement (%) | 3 (7.1) | 0 (0) | 0.183 |
| Complications | |||
| Overall (%) | 5 (11.9) | 0 (0) | 0.041 |
| Esophageal disposition (%) | 4 (9.5) | 0 (0) | 0.086 |
| Oral bleeding (%) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 0.457 |
| Death (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | NS |
aMore than one kind of difficulty/complication occurred during intubation in some mice
Fig. 4Histological examination (H&E stain) of the intubated trachea at the site around the tip of the tracheal tube in mice sacrificed immediately (average 3 h) after completion of the experiment (Panels a & b) or at 28 days after completion of a follow-up period (Panels c & d). a & c, representative tracheal tissue of mice in the Conventional group. The epithelial lining was focally interrupted and the associated cilia were lost (arrows). b & d, representative tracheal tissue of mice in the Modified group. The ciliated epithelium was intact and free from micro-damage