Kung-Sik Chan1, Feiran Jiao2, Marek A Mikulski2, Alicia Gerke3, Junfeng Guo4, John D Newell4, Eric A Hoffman5, Brad Thompson6, Chang Hyun Lee7, Laurence J Fuortes8. 1. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Iowa, Schaeffer Hall 241, Iowa City, IA 52242. Electronic address: kung-sik-chan@uiowa.edu. 2. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, USA. 4. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, USA. 5. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, USA; Departments of Radiology, Internal Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 8. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health and Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the role of automated quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan interpretation algorithm in detecting interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or emphysema in a sample of elderly subjects with mild lung disease. We hypothesized that the quantification and distributions of CT attenuation values on lung CT, over a subset of Hounsfield units (HUs) range (-1000 HU, 0 HU), can differentiate early or mild disease from normal lung. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the results of quantitative spiral rapid end-exhalation (functional residual capacity, FRC) and end-inhalation (total lung capacity, TLC) CT scan analyses of 52 subjects with radiographic evidence of mild fibrotic lung disease to the results of 17 normal subjects. Several CT value distributions were explored, including (1) that from the peripheral lung taken at TLC (with peels at 15 or 65 mm), (2) the ratio of (1) to that from the core of lung, and (3) the ratio of (2) to its FRC counterpart. We developed a fused-lasso logistic regression model that can automatically identify sub-intervals of -1000 HU and 0 HU over which a CT value distribution provides optimal discrimination between abnormal and normal scans. RESULTS: The fused-lasso logistic regression model based on (2) with 15-mm peel identified the relative frequency of CT values of over -1000 HU and -900 and those over -450 HU and -200 HU as a means of discriminating abnormal versus normal lung, resulting in a zero out-sample false-positive rate, and 15% false-negative rate of that was lowered to 12% by pooling information. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential usefulness of this novel quantitative imaging analysis method in discriminating ILD and/or emphysema from normal lungs.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the role of automated quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan interpretation algorithm in detecting interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or emphysema in a sample of elderly subjects with mild lung disease. We hypothesized that the quantification and distributions of CT attenuation values on lung CT, over a subset of Hounsfield units (HUs) range (-1000 HU, 0 HU), can differentiate early or mild disease from normal lung. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the results of quantitative spiral rapid end-exhalation (functional residual capacity, FRC) and end-inhalation (total lung capacity, TLC) CT scan analyses of 52 subjects with radiographic evidence of mild fibrotic lung disease to the results of 17 normal subjects. Several CT value distributions were explored, including (1) that from the peripheral lung taken at TLC (with peels at 15 or 65 mm), (2) the ratio of (1) to that from the core of lung, and (3) the ratio of (2) to its FRC counterpart. We developed a fused-lasso logistic regression model that can automatically identify sub-intervals of -1000 HU and 0 HU over which a CT value distribution provides optimal discrimination between abnormal and normal scans. RESULTS: The fused-lasso logistic regression model based on (2) with 15-mm peel identified the relative frequency of CT values of over -1000 HU and -900 and those over -450 HU and -200 HU as a means of discriminating abnormal versus normal lung, resulting in a zero out-sample false-positive rate, and 15% false-negative rate of that was lowered to 12% by pooling information. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential usefulness of this novel quantitative imaging analysis method in discriminating ILD and/or emphysema from normal lungs.
Authors: David A Lynch; J David Godwin; Sharon Safrin; Karen M Starko; Phil Hormel; Kevin K Brown; Ganesh Raghu; Talmadge E King; Williamson Z Bradford; David A Schwartz; W Richard Webb Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-05-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Marek A Mikulski; Patrick G Hartley; Nancy L Sprince; Wayne T Sanderson; Spencer Lourens; Nicole E Worden; Kai Wang; Laurence J Fuortes Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Cuneyt Yilmaz; Snehal S Watharkar; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Christine K Garcia; Nova C Patel; Kirk G Jordan; Connie C W Hsia Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Amy L Olson; Jeffrey J Swigris; Dennis C Lezotte; Jill M Norris; Carla G Wilson; Kevin K Brown Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elke Ochsmann; Tanja Carl; Peter Brand; Hans-Jürgen Raithel; Thomas Kraus Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-07-18 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Ashley Busacker; John D Newell; Thomas Keefe; Eric A Hoffman; Janice Cook Granroth; Mario Castro; Sean Fain; Sally Wenzel Journal: Chest Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 9.410