BACKGROUND: Prognostic significance of left atrial (LA) function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of LA function measured with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking and AF recurrence following catheter ablation. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one AF patients (72% paroxysmal, mean age 59 ± 10 years) were enrolled. Baseline LA function was measured by calculating passive, active, and total emptying fractions (LAEF) and analysis of global longitudinal strain and strain rates. Patients were followed up for recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT). Hazard ratios for recurrence were calculated using Cox proportional models adjusted for potential clinical confounders, type of AF, left ventricular ejection fraction, AF duration, LA volume, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9 months, 52 patients (43%) experienced recurrent AF/AT. Patients with recurrent AF/AT had higher baseline LA volume index and lower LA passive, and total LAEF (P < .05 for all). The baseline peak LA strain and strain rates in all phases of LA function were lower in the AF/AT recurrence group (P < .01 for all). In multivariable analysis total LAEF, peak LA strain, and systolic and late diastolic strain rates were associated with recurrence. Both peak LA strain and total LAEF improved prediction of recurrent AT/AF compared to the baseline clinical model, including LA LGE (C statistic 0.82 vs 0.77, P < .05 for both total LAEF and peak LA strain). CONCLUSIONS: LA reservoir function was independently associated with recurrent AF/AT after PVI and can additionally improve risk stratification in patients undergoing PVI.
BACKGROUND: Prognostic significance of left atrial (LA) function in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of LA function measured with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature-tracking and AF recurrence following catheter ablation. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one AFpatients (72% paroxysmal, mean age 59 ± 10 years) were enrolled. Baseline LA function was measured by calculating passive, active, and total emptying fractions (LAEF) and analysis of global longitudinal strain and strain rates. Patients were followed up for recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT). Hazard ratios for recurrence were calculated using Cox proportional models adjusted for potential clinical confounders, type of AF, left ventricular ejection fraction, AF duration, LA volume, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 18 ± 9 months, 52 patients (43%) experienced recurrent AF/AT. Patients with recurrent AF/AT had higher baseline LA volume index and lower LA passive, and total LAEF (P < .05 for all). The baseline peak LA strain and strain rates in all phases of LA function were lower in the AF/AT recurrence group (P < .01 for all). In multivariable analysis total LAEF, peak LA strain, and systolic and late diastolic strain rates were associated with recurrence. Both peak LA strain and total LAEF improved prediction of recurrent AT/AF compared to the baseline clinical model, including LA LGE (C statistic 0.82 vs 0.77, P < .05 for both total LAEF and peak LA strain). CONCLUSIONS: LA reservoir function was independently associated with recurrent AF/AT after PVI and can additionally improve risk stratification in patients undergoing PVI.
Authors: Luisa Ciuffo; Susumu Tao; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Tarek Zghaib; Muhammad Balouch; Joao A C Lima; Saman Nazarian; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Hiroshi Ashikaga Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-01-17
Authors: Luisa Ciuffo; Vanesa Bruña; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Henrique Doria de Vasconcellos; Susumu Tao; Tarek Zghaib; Saman Nazarian; David D Spragg; Joseph Marine; Ronald D Berger; Joao A C Lima; Hugh Calkins; Antonio Bayés-de-Luna; Hiroshi Ashikaga Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-06-15
Authors: Mohammadali Habibi; Joao A C Lima; Esra Gucuk Ipek; David Spragg; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2020-12-29
Authors: Alena Yakimenka; Dina Labib; Steven Dykstra; Yoko Mikami; Alessandro Satriano; Jacqueline Flewitt; Patricia Feuchter; Sandra Rivest; Andrew G Howarth; Carmen P Lydell; F Russell Quinn; Stephen B Wilton; James A White Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Mayank Sardana; Adedotun A Ogunsua; Matthew Spring; Amir Shaikh; Owusu Asamoah; Glenn Stokken; Clifford Browning; Cynthia Ennis; J Kevin Donahue; Lawrence S Rosenthal; Kevin C Floyd; Gerard P Aurigemma; Nisha I Parikh; David D McManus Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 2.942