Literature DB >> 26775079

Two-year results and subgroup analyses of the PEPCAD China in-stent restenosis trial: A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial for the treatment of drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis.

Bo Xu1, Jie Qian1, Junbo Ge2, Jian'an Wang3, Fang Chen4, Jiyan Chen5, Meng Wei6, Yundai Chen7, Yuejin Yang1, Runlin Gao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PEPCAD China ISR trial investigated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty in an Asian patient population with coronary drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR).
METHODS: A total of 220 patients with coronary DES-ISR were treated with PCB angioplasty or with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). This randomized (1:1), single-blind prospective multicenter trial in a Chinese population used 9-month in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included the 24-month clinical event rates.
RESULTS: Both treatment groups were similar in terms of patient, lesion, or procedural characteristics. After the 12-month follow-up evaluation, additional clinical events only occurred in the PES study group. The combined rate of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) in the PCB group was significantly lower than that in the PES group (3.7% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.03). Additional subgroup analyses of 9-month in-segment LLL and 2-year target lesion failure in patients with diabetes, small vessels, diffuse ISR, and stent margin restenosis did not show more favorable results for one specific treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year follow-up demonstrated sustained long-term clinical efficacy for both devices. PCB angioplasty was associated with significantly lower overall and cardiovascular mortality/MI rates in patients with DES-ISR lesions while avoiding the use of additional metal layers for drug release (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 01622075).
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug-eluting stent; in-stent restenosis; paclitaxel-coated balloon; paclitaxel-eluting stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26775079     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

Review 1.  Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Predictors and Treatment.

Authors:  Helen Ullrich; Maximilian Olschewski; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.251

Review 2.  Application of drug-coated balloon in coronary artery intervention: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Yun-Dai Chen
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Coated Balloon.

Authors:  Yuxuan Zhang; Xinyi Zhang; Qichao Dong; Delong Chen; Yi Xu; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-01

4.  Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis in the Routine Clinical Practice: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yong Zhu; Kesen Liu; Xiangyun Kong; Jing Nan; Ang Gao; Yan Liu; Hongya Han; Hong Li; Huagang Zhu; Jianwei Zhang; Yingxin Zhao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Comparison of new-generation drug-eluting stents versus drug-coated balloon for in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin-Zan Cai; Yong-Xiang Zhu; Xin-Yu Wang; Christos V Bourantas; Javaid Iqbal; Hao Zhu; Paul Cummins; Sheng-Jie Dong; Anthony Mathur; Yao-Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.