Literature DB >> 2677409

Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer.

H B Carter1, U M Hamper, S Sheth, R C Sanders, J I Epstein, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

To determine the ability of transrectal ultrasound to detect early localized prostate cancer, unsuspected (nonpalpable) cancer in the contralateral lobe of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized disease was evaluated. A total of 59 patients with palpable prostate cancer clinically confined to 1 lobe underwent transrectal ultrasound before radical prostatectomy and step-sectioning of the radical prostatectomy specimen. Transrectal ultrasound was performed with 5 or 7 MHz. real-time transrectal units. Pathological findings in these 59 cases revealed no tumor in the contralateral lobe in 34 (58%) and the presence of unsuspected tumor in 25 (42%). Transrectal ultrasound detected 13 of 25 unsuspected cancers for a sensitivity of 52%. Of 34 patients with no contralateral lobe lesion transrectal ultrasound was correct in 23 for a specificity of 68%. The positive and negative predictive values for transrectal ultrasound in this study group were 54 and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the pathological size of the clinically suspected and clinically unsuspected cancers as measured by average largest dimension, and transrectal ultrasound sensitivity did not correlate with the size of the cancer. Based on careful sonopathological analysis, transrectal ultrasound may not be a good method to detect clinically unsuspected prostate cancer and the false positive rate would appear to be high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2677409     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Three dimensional ultrasound and prostate cancer.

Authors:  S S Mehta; A R Azzouzi; F C Hamdy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: a study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro.

Authors:  Simon Phipps
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  [Imaging diagnostics of the prostate].

Authors:  D J Dinter; A M Weidner; F Wenz; A E Pelzer; M S Michel; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  [Innovative concepts in early cancer detection and staging of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Rinnab; R Küfer; R E Hautmann; B G Volkmer; M Straub; N M Blumstein; H W Gottfried
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Transurethral light delivery for prostate photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Xiaoyu Guo; Danny Y Song; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  The detection of prostatic carcinoma. 4- or 7-MHz transrectal ultrasonography?

Authors:  R Vleeming; J W Noordzij; T M de Reijke; K H Kurth
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Nigel Borley; Mark R Feneley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.