Ives Cavalcante Passos1, Benson Mwangi2, Bo Cao3, Jane E Hamilton3, Mon-Ju Wu3, Xiang Yang Zhang4, Giovana B Zunta-Soares3, Joao Quevedo3, Marcia Kauer-Sant'Anna5, Flávio Kapczinski5, Jair C Soares3. 1. Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Bipolar Disorder Program and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 2. Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: benson.irungu@uth.tmc.edu. 3. Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. 4. Center of Excellence on Mood Disorder, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, PR China. 5. Bipolar Disorder Program and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A growing body of evidence has put forward clinical risk factors associated with patients with mood disorders that attempt suicide. However, what is not known is how to integrate clinical variables into a clinically useful tool in order to estimate the probability of an individual patient attempting suicide. METHOD: A total of 144 patients with mood disorders were included. Clinical variables associated with suicide attempts among patients with mood disorders and demographic variables were used to 'train' a machine learning algorithm. The resulting algorithm was utilized in identifying novel or 'unseen' individual subjects as either suicide attempters or non-attempters. Three machine learning algorithms were implemented and evaluated. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished individual suicide attempters from non-attempters with prediction accuracy ranging between 65% and 72% (p<0.05). In particular, the relevance vector machine (RVM) algorithm correctly predicted 103 out of 144 subjects translating into 72% accuracy (72.1% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity) and an area under the curve of 0.77 (p<0.0001). The most relevant predictor variables in distinguishing attempters from non-attempters included previous hospitalizations for depression, a history of psychosis, cocaine dependence and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Risk for suicide attempt among patients with mood disorders can be estimated at an individual subject level by incorporating both demographic and clinical variables. Future studies should examine the performance of this model in other populations and its subsequent utility in facilitating selection of interventions to prevent suicide.
OBJECTIVE: A growing body of evidence has put forward clinical risk factors associated with patients with mood disorders that attempt suicide. However, what is not known is how to integrate clinical variables into a clinically useful tool in order to estimate the probability of an individual patient attempting suicide. METHOD: A total of 144 patients with mood disorders were included. Clinical variables associated with suicide attempts among patients with mood disorders and demographic variables were used to 'train' a machine learning algorithm. The resulting algorithm was utilized in identifying novel or 'unseen' individual subjects as either suicide attempters or non-attempters. Three machine learning algorithms were implemented and evaluated. RESULTS: All algorithms distinguished individual suicide attempters from non-attempters with prediction accuracy ranging between 65% and 72% (p<0.05). In particular, the relevance vector machine (RVM) algorithm correctly predicted 103 out of 144 subjects translating into 72% accuracy (72.1% sensitivity and 71.3% specificity) and an area under the curve of 0.77 (p<0.0001). The most relevant predictor variables in distinguishing attempters from non-attempters included previous hospitalizations for depression, a history of psychosis, cocaine dependence and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Risk for suicide attempt among patients with mood disorders can be estimated at an individual subject level by incorporating both demographic and clinical variables. Future studies should examine the performance of this model in other populations and its subsequent utility in facilitating selection of interventions to prevent suicide.
Authors: Albina R Torres; Ana Teresa A Ramos-Cerqueira; Ygor A Ferrão; Leonardo F Fontenelle; Maria Conceição do Rosário; Euripedes C Miguel Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: K Mikael Holma; Jari Haukka; Kirsi Suominen; Hanna M Valtonen; Outi Mantere; Tarja K Melartin; T Petteri Sokero; Maria A Oquendo; Erkki T Isometsä Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Michael F Grunebaum; Steven P Ellis; Naihua Duan; Ainsley K Burke; Maria A Oquendo; J John Mann Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Tina R Goldstein; Wonho Ha; David A Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Neal D Ryan; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey Hunt; Heather Hower; Martin Keller; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-11
Authors: Osvaldo P Almeida; Brian Draper; John Snowdon; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Jane Pirkis; Gerard Byrne; Moira Sim; Nigel Stocks; Leon Flicker; Jon J Pfaff Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Robin F H Cash; Luca Cocchi; Rodney Anderson; Anton Rogachov; Aaron Kucyi; Alexander J Barnett; Andrew Zalesky; Paul B Fitzgerald Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Michael R Mathis; Milo C Engoren; Hyeon Joo; Michael D Maile; Keith D Aaronson; Michael L Burns; Michael W Sjoding; Nicholas J Douville; Allison M Janda; Yaokun Hu; Kayvan Najarian; Sachin Kheterpal Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Harry Rubin-Falcone; Francesca Zanderigo; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; Martin Lan; Jeffrey M Miller; M Elizabeth Sublette; Maria A Oquendo; David J Hellerstein; Patrick J McGrath; Johnathan W Stewart; J John Mann Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Frank Iorfino; Tracey A Davenport; Laura Ospina-Pinillos; Daniel F Hermens; Shane Cross; Jane Burns; Ian B Hickie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: B Cao; I C Passos; B Mwangi; H Amaral-Silva; J Tannous; M-J Wu; G B Zunta-Soares; J C Soares Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Robert Suchting; Joshua L Gowin; Charles E Green; Consuelo Walss-Bass; Scott D Lane Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.558