Literature DB >> 2677379

The Appleton Consensus: suggested international guidelines for decisions to forego medical treatment.

J M Stanley1.   

Abstract

Thirty-three physicians, bioethicists, and medical economists from ten different countries met at Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin, to create The Appleton Consensus: International Guidelines for Decisions to Forego Medical Treatment. The guidelines deal with four specific decision-making circumstances: 1. Five guidelines were created for decisions involving competent patients or patients who have executed an advance directive before becoming incompetent, and those guidelines fell into three categories. 2. Thirteen guidelines were created for decisions involving patients who were once competent, but are not now competent, who have not executed an advance directive. 3. Seven guidelines were created for decisions involving patients who are not now and never have been competent, for whom 'no substituted judgement' can be rendered. 4. Eleven guidelines were created for decisions involving the scarcity of medical resources, which exists in all communities. Five concepts were identified as being critical in the establishment of priorities, given the reality of scarce health resources (1). The term 'physician' is used in the American sense, synonymous with 'medical practitioner'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Appleton Consensus; Death and Euthanasia; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2677379      PMCID: PMC1375803          DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.3.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Equity - some theory and its policy implications.

Authors:  A J Culyer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Resource allocation: whose realism?

Authors:  P A Lewis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Should patients in a persistent vegetative state be allowed to die? Guidelines for a new standard of care in Australian hospitals.

Authors:  Evie Kendal; Laura-Jane Maher
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015 Jun-Sep

4.  Terminal sedation, euthanasia, and causal roles.

Authors:  Dieter Birnbacher
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-05-31

5.  On discontinuing dialysis.

Authors:  J Wight
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Eric R Stone; Andrew M Parker; Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  The importance of patient-provider communication in end-of-life care.

Authors:  Timothy R Rice; Yuriy Dobry; Vladan Novakovic; Jacob M Appel
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Surrogate utility estimation by long-term partners and unfamiliar dyads.

Authors:  Richard J Tunney; Fenja V Ziegler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-25

9.  Common medical ethical issues faced by healthcare professionals in KSA.

Authors:  Faisal AbuAbah; Abdulaziz Alwan; Yassar Al-Jahdali; Adnan Al Shaikh; Abdullah Alharbi; Hamdan Al-Jahdali
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.