Literature DB >> 26773464

Influence of 3D printed porous architecture on mesenchymal stem cell enrichment and differentiation.

Kimberly M Ferlin1, Margaret E Prendergast1, Makenzie L Miller1, David S Kaplan2, John P Fisher3.   

Abstract

The interactions between cells and an underlying biomaterial are important for the promotion of cell adhesion, proliferation, and function. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have great clinical potential as they are an adult stem cell population capable of multilineage differentiation. The relationship between MSC behavior and several material properties including substrate stiffness and pore size are well investigated, but there has been little research on the influence of porous architecture in a three-dimensional scaffold with a well-controlled architecture. Here, we investigate the impact of two different three-dimensionally printed, pore geometries on the enrichment and differentiation of MSCs. 3D printed scaffolds with ordered cubic pore geometry were supportive of MSC enrichment from unprocessed bone marrow, resulting in cell surface marker expression that was comparable to typical adhesion to tissue culture polystyrene, the gold standard for MSC culture. Results also show that scaffolds fabricated with ordered cubic pores significantly increase the gene expression of MSCs undergoing adipogenesis and chondrogenesis, when compared to scaffolds with ordered cylindrical pores. However, at the protein expression level, these differences were modest. For MSCs undergoing osteogenesis, gene expression results suggest that cylindrical pores may initially increase early osteogenic marker expression, while protein level expression at later timepoints is increased for scaffolds with ordered cubic pores. Taken together, these results suggest that 3D printed scaffolds with ordered cubic pores could be a suitable culture system for single-step MSC enrichment and differentiation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have great therapeutic potential, as they are capable of multilineage differentiation. MSC behavior, including lineage commitment, may be influenced by biomaterial properties including substrate stiffness and pore size. With three-dimensional (3D) printing, we can investigate these relationships in 3D culture systems. Here, we fabricated scaffolds with two different well-controlled pore geometries, and investigated the impact on MSC enrichment and differentiation. Results show that scaffolds with ordered cubic pore geometry were supportive of both MSC enrichment from unprocessed bone marrow as well as MSC differentiation, resulting in increased gene expression during adipogenesis and chondrogenesis. These results suggest that 3D printed scaffolds with ordered cubic pores could be a suitable culture system for single-step MSC enrichment and differentiation.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Biomaterial; Differentiation; Mesenchymal stem cell; Scaffold architecture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26773464     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  20 in total

1.  3D-printed gelatin scaffolds of differing pore geometry modulate hepatocyte function and gene expression.

Authors:  Phillip L Lewis; Richard M Green; Ramille N Shah
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Beyond 2D: 3D bioprinting for skin regeneration.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yihui Wang; Bin Yao; Tian Hu; Zhao Li; Sha Huang; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Josephine Lembong; Greg Gillen; John P Fisher
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

4.  In Vitro Tool: 3D Cell Culture of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on Low Stiffness Silicone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Peggy Stock
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Fabrication of Trabecular Bone-Templated Tissue-Engineered Constructs by 3D Inkjet Printing.

Authors:  Joseph P Vanderburgh; Shanik J Fernando; Alyssa R Merkel; Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Aminated 3D Printed Polystyrene Maintains Stem Cell Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation.

Authors:  Max J Lerman; Brandon T Smith; Anushka G Gerald; Marco Santoro; James A Fookes; Antonios G Mikos; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 7.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Molecules and Biomaterial Technologies Affecting Stem Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Marco Mascitti; Marcella La Noce; Francesca Posa; Yasusei Kudo; Nicola Cirillo
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 5.131

9.  Growth factors produced by bone marrow stromal cells on nanoroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium surfaces program distal MSCs into osteoblasts via BMP2 signaling.

Authors:  Michael B Berger; Kyla B Bosh; Thomas W Jacobs; D Joshua Cohen; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Influence of Geometry and Architecture on the In Vivo Success of 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Mitchell Hallman; J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Soyeon Jeong; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Adam Jakus; Richard Pahapill; Chawon Yun; Ramille Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.