Literature DB >> 26772145

Feedback processing in children and adolescents: Is there a sensitivity for processing rewarding feedback?

Nicola K Ferdinand1, Aljoscha M W Becker2, Jutta Kray2, William J Gehring3.   

Abstract

Developmental studies indicate that children rely more on external feedback than adults. Some of these studies claim that they additionally show higher sensitivity toward positive feedback, while others find they preferably use negative feedback for learning. However, these studies typically did not disentangle feedback valence and expectancy, which might contribute to the controversial results. The present study aimed at examining the neurophysiological correlates of feedback processing in children (8-10 years) and adolescents (12-14 years) in a time estimation paradigm that allows separating the contribution of valence and expectancy. Our results show that in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), an event-related potential (ERP) reflecting the fast initial processing of feedback stimuli, children and adolescents did not differentiate between unexpected positive and negative feedback. Thus, they did not show higher sensitivity to positive feedback. The FRN did also not differentiate between expected and unexpected feedback, as found for adults. In contrast, in a later processing stage mirrored in the P300 component of the ERP, children and adolescents processed the feedback's unexpectedness. Interestingly, adolescents with better behavioral adaptation (high-performers) also had a more frontal P300 expectancy effect. Thus, the recruitment of additional frontal brain regions might lead to better learning from feedback in adolescents.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Childhood; Event-related potentials; Feedback processing; Feedback-related negativity (FRN); P300

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26772145     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  9 in total

1.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Learning With and Without Feedback in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Yael Arbel; Isabel Fitzpatrick; Xinyi He
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Different Electrophysiological Responses to Informative Value of Feedback Between Children and Adults.

Authors:  Bin Du; Bihua Cao; Weiqi He; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 4.  The Influence of Different Kinds of Incentives on Decision-Making and Cognitive Control in Adolescent Development: A Review of Behavioral and Neuroscientific Studies.

Authors:  Jutta Kray; Hannah Schmitt; Corinna Lorenz; Nicola K Ferdinand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-23

5.  Greater learning transfer effect for avoidance of loss than for achievement of gain in Finnish and Russian schoolchildren.

Authors:  A A Sozinov; S Laukka; A I Lyashchenko; A Siipo; M Nopanen; T Tuominen; Yu I Alexandrov
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-06-09

6.  Emotional feedback ameliorates older adults' feedback-induced learning.

Authors:  Nicola K Ferdinand; Melanie Hilz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Electrophysiological Examination of Feedback-Based Learning in 8-11-Year-Old Children.

Authors:  Yael Arbel; Annie B Fox
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-25

8.  Electrophysiological Response to the Informative Value of Feedback Revealed in a Segmented Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  Fuhong Li; Jing Wang; Bin Du; Bihua Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-05

9.  Developmental differences in processing the valence and magnitude of incentive cues: Mid-adolescents are more sensitive to potential gains than early- or late-adolescents.

Authors:  Nicola K Ferdinand; Efsevia Kapsali; Marc Woirgardt; Jutta Kray
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.526

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.