Literature DB >> 26770042

Venous Thromboembolism Following Hip and Knee Replacement Arthroplasty in Korea: A Nationwide Study Based on Claims Registry.

Sahnghoon Lee1, Jee-In Hwang2, Yunjung Kim3, Pil Whan Yoon4, Jeonghoon Ahn3, Jeong Joon Yoo5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and trends of clinically relevant venous thromboembolism (VTE) including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after hip and knee replacement arthroplasty (HKRA) in Korea. Between January 1 and December 31, 2010, 22,127 hip replacement arthroplasty (HRA) patients and 52,882 knee replacement arthroplasty (KRA) patients were enrolled in the analysis using the administrative claims database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA). All available parameters including procedure history and clinically relevant VTE during the 90 days after HKRA were identified based on diagnostic and electronic data interchange (EDI) codes. The overall incidence of VTE, DVT, and PE during the 90 days was 3.9% (n=853), 2.7% (n=597), and 1.5% (n=327) after HRA, while the incidence was 3.8% (n=1,990), 3.2% (n=1,699), and 0.7% (n=355) after KRA. The incidence of VTE after HKRA was significantly higher in patients who had previous VTE history (odds ratio [OR], 10.8 after HRA, OR, 8.5 after KRA), chronic heart failure (2.1, 1.3), arrhythmia (1.8, 1.7), and atrial fibrillation (3.4, 2.1) than in patients who did not. The VTE incidence in patients with chemoprophylaxis was higher than that in patients without chemoprophylaxis. The incidence of VTEs revealed in this retrospective review was not low compared with the results of the studies targeting other Asian or Caucasian populations. It may warrant routine prevention including employment of chemoprophylaxis. However, the limitation of the reviewed data mandates large scale prospective investigation to affirm this observation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoprophylaxis; Hip; Knee; Korea; Replacement Arthroplasty; Venous Thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26770042      PMCID: PMC4712584          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.1.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication and an important safety issue in acute care hospitals (1). Among major surgical procedures, hip and knee replacement arthroplasty (HKRA) carries the greatest risk of VTE. In the absence of prophylactic therapy, the incidence of postoperative VTE is particularly high after lower extremity arthroplasty. The incidence of imaging-confirmed asymptomatic DVT was known to vary from 42% to 57% after hip arthroplasty, and from 41% to 85% after knee arthroplasty. The incidence of PE varies from 0.9% to 28% after hip arthroplasty, and from 1.5% to 10% after knee arthroplasty (2). Clinically significant symptomatic VTE has been reported to be less common (23). It has been suggested that there is a substantially lower incidence of VTE after HKRA in Asian populations compared with Western populations (456). However, in recent multicenter prospective studies performed in Asia, incidences of VTE after major orthopedic surgery including arthroplasty were comparable to those in Western populations (789). Moreover, there are few reports on the incidence of clinically-relevant symptomatic VTE after HKRA in East Asian patients (56). To determine to use thromboprophylactic agents routinely after HKRA, a study of symptomatic VTE in a large number of patients is necessary. There is marked discrepancy among reference studies. Major confounding factors might be various diagnostic modalities with different sensitivity, monitoring duration, lack of information on the use of mechanical device, study design, and surgeon vigilance. In this study, we evaluated nationwide data regarding the incidence of VTE after HKRA in Korea using the administrative claims database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), which comprises fully adjudicated medical and pharmacy claims for 50 million beneficiaries in Korea. Every clinic, hospital, and pharmacy in Korea is obliged to submit patient data regarding healthcare services and medical costs to the HIRA for reimbursement (10). Therefore, almost all clinically-relevant VTE events can be identified by analyzing the HIRA database. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and trends of clinically-relevant VTE including PE among patients who had undergone HKRA in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data source

We analyzed the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database from HIRA, which examines the accuracy of claims for NHI and National Medical Aid (NMA) programs. The NHI database includes the entire Korean population (approximately 96.6% of the entire 48.6 million population as well as registered foreign-nationals) as a compulsory insurance system, with exceptions for cases applicable to the NMA program covering the remaining 3.4% of the population and foreign military personnel. The claims data covered by NMA program are also reviewed by HIRA. Thus, nearly all information about patients is available from the HIRA database. Information in the HIRA database includes a unique identification number for each patient, age, sex, and all medical services rendered, along with the diagnostic code (based on the International Classification of Diseases, ICD, Tenth Edition), all prescription medications dispensed (based on code for drug ingredient), and procedure history (based on electronic data interchange [EDI] code). Additional information includes hospital type where the surgery was performed and the duration of hospitalization.

Study population and baseline characteristics

We identified 22,127 patients who underwent hip replacement arthroplasty (HRA) and 52,882 patients who underwent knee replacement arthroplasty (KRA) at 882 hospitals nationwide between January 1 and December 31, 2010. The date of index surgery was defined as the initiation date of hospitalization for HKRA on claims registry data. HRA procedure codes included N0715 for primary bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty, N0711 for primary total hip arthroplasty, N1715 and N1725 for revision partial hip arthroplasty (acetabular or stem revision only), and N1711 and N1721 for revision total hip arthroplasty. KRA procedure codes included N2712 (primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty), N2072 (primary total knee arthroplasty), N4712 and N4722 (revision partial knee arthroplasty), N3712 and N3722 (revision total knee arthroplasty). Patients over 100 yr of age and those who received HRA and KRA at the same hospitalization were excluded. The use of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis such as aspirin, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was identified for each patient. 37.3% of 22,127 HRA patients (n=8,259) and 48.4% of 52,882 KRA patients (n=25,577) had received chemoprophylaxis. The results of the patients in chemoprophylaxis group were assessed and compared with those of 13,868 HRA patients (62.7%) and 27,305 KRA patients (51.6%) who had not received chemoprophylaxis (Fig. 1). All clinically relevant VTE during hospitalization and 90 days after HKRA were recorded using the ICD-10 code classification (180, 182 for DVT; 126 for PE). Baseline characteristics and potential risk factors including patient age, sex, comorbidities, and surgery characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportion, mean, and standard deviation. Items for baseline characteristics and preoperative morbidities of the patients were listed with reference to the Korean Guideline for the Prevention of VTE in 2010, Guideline for the Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism in Hip Surgery Patients in 2011, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) guideline in 2011, 9th edition of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based clinical practice guideline, NICE guideline in 2010, and the literature. All listed items were reviewed by statisticians and clinical experts.
Fig. 1

Selection process and flowchart of study population. A flowchart shows the selection process of study population. A total of 22,127 patients who underwent hip replacement arthroplasty (HRA) and 52,882 patients who underwent knee replacement arthroplasty (KRA) at 882 hospitals nationwide were finally enrolled in the analysis between January 1 and December 31, 2010. Multiple hospitalizations were defined as one episode of hospitalizaton if the interval between the two successive hospitalizations was less than 2 days. Index procedure: the first replacement arthroplasty during the study period. Index date: the first date of hospitalization during which the index replacement arthroplasty was performed.

Statistical analyses

Hospital type was categorized into four groups (tertiary hospital, general hospital, hospital, and clinic). Independent t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables, and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. The chi-square test of independence was used to evaluate the difference in the incidence among arthroplasty type; and the cumulative incidence of VTE was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio. Chi-square test was performed to compare the incidence between patients with and without comorbidities. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS® statistical software version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used for data management and statistical analyses.

Ethics statement

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECAIRB 12-004-1) and Seoul National University Hospital (E-1304-066-482). The board waived informed consent from involved subjects.

RESULTS

The percent of female patients with knee replacement was higher than that with hip replacement. The age of most patients with hip replacement was evenly distributed between 45 and 84 yr, while more than half of the patients with knee replacement (52.1%) were between 65- and 74-yr-of-age. Hypertension showed the highest prevalence (57.1% to 72.5%) among past medical morbidities. Diabetes, coronary artery stenosis, malignancy and stroke also showed high prevalence. Most hip and knee replacements were performed in general and secondary level hospitals, whereas more hip replacements were performed in tertiary general hospitals (35.0%) than hospitals (22.8%) in the group receiving chemoprophylaxis. More than half of HRAs were primary bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (57.2%) and one-third was primary total hip arthroplasty (32.3%). Regarding KRA, unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty comprised 54.2% of surgeries and bilateral total knee arthroplasty 39.3%. It was unknown whether the bilateral surgeries were simultaneous or staged. Regional anesthesia was used in 87.9% and packed red blood cells were transfused in 83.1%. In 96.1% of HKRA cases, platelets were not transfused. The mean duration of anesthesia was 2.9 hr for HRA and 2.8 hr for KRA. Gender ratio, age, VTE history, diabetes, stroke, hypertension, coronary artery stenosis, arrhythmia, anticoagulation therapy, surgical characteristics, and RBC transfusion differed between the group with chemoprophylaxis and the group without chemoprophylaxis among baseline characteristics (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients with hip and knee replacement

ParametersPatients with knee replacementPatients with knee replacement
Chemoprophylaxis(-) (n = 13,868)Chemoprophylaxis(+) (n = 8,259)P value*Chemoprophylaxis(-) (n = 27,305)Chemoprophylaxis(+) (n = 25,577)P value*
No. (%)No. (%)No. (%)No. (%)
Gender0.0010.001
 Male5,445 (39.3)3,052 (37.0)3,553 (13.0)2,927 (11.4)
 Female8,423 (60.7)5,207 (63.0)23,752 (87.0)22,650 (88.6)
Age (yr)
 Mean ± SD68.6±15.269.6±14.2<0.00168.5±7.768.6±7.00.333
 ≤ 441,145 (8.3)547 (6.6)<0.001141 (0.5)36 (0.1)<0.001
 45 ≤ age ≤ 643,433 (24.8)1,900 (23.0)7,070 (25.9)6,595 (25.8)
 65 ≤ age ≤ 743,456 (24.9)2,254 (27.3)14,222 (52.1)13,860 (54.2)
 75 ≤ age ≤ 844,077 (29.4)2,572 (31.1)5,700 (20.9)4,939 (19.3)
 ≥ 851,757 (12.7)986 (11.9)172 (0.6)147 (0.6)
Past medical history
 Venous thromboembolic event (<3 yr)317 (2.3)308 (3.7)< 0.001644 (2.4)759 (3.0)< 0.001
 Surgical site infection (<3 yr)536 (3.9)328 (4.0)0.693487 (1.8)424 (1.7)0.267
 Diabetes (<3 yr)5,600 (40.4)3,622 (43.9)< 0.00112,172 (44.6)11,817 (46.2)< 0.001
 Stroke (<3 yr)2,534 (18.3)1,746 (21.1)< 0.0013,449 (12.6)3,216 (12.6)0.842
 Renal disease (<3 yr)800 (5.8)567 (6.9)0.0011,305 (4.8)1,253 (4.9)0.522
 Hypertension (<3 yr)7,912 (57.1)5,322 (64.4)< 0.00118,691 (68.5)18,551 (72.5)< 0.001
 Coronary artery stenosis ( < 3 yr)2,819 (20.3)2,216 (26.8)<0.0016,545 (24.0)6,683 (26.1)< 0.001
 Chronic heart failure, congestive heart failure (<3 yr)1,012 (7.3)794 (9.6)< 0.0012,003 (7.3)1,819 (7.1)0.321
 Arrhythmia (<3 yr)828 (6.0)629 (7.6)< 0.0011,862 (6.8)1,900 (7.4)0.007
 Atrial fibrillation ( < 3 yr)455 (3.3)486 (5.9)< 0.001736 (2.7)750 (2.9)0.100
 Malignancy (≤3 yr)1,616 (11.7)970 (11.7)0.8372,230 (8.2)2,043 (8.0)0.450
 Varicose vein (<3 yr)127 (0.9)99 (1.2)0.043708 (2.6)724 (2.8)0.092
 Hormone therapy (≤1 yr)368 (2.7)247 (3.0)0.140892 (3.3)857 (3.4)0.590
 Anticoagulation therapy (<6 mo)751 (5.4)718 (8.7)< 0.0011,109 (4.1)1,386 (5.4)< 0.001
Surgical characteristics
 Hospital pattern (level of reference)<0.001<0.001
  Tertiary general hospital2,569 (18.5)2,890 (35.0)3,259 (11.9)3,320 (13.0)
  General hospital6,209 (44.8)3,444 (41.7)7,176 (26.3)6,382 (25.0)
  Hospital4,798 (34.6)1,887 (22.8)15,336 (56.2)15,407 (60.2)
  Clinic292 (2.1)38 (0.5)1,534 (5.6)468 (1.8)
 Type of surgery<0.001<0.001
  HRA: Primary bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty8,256 (59.5)4,399 (53.3)
  HRA: Primary total hip arthroplasty4,248 (30.6)2,904 (35.2)
  HRA: Revision partial hip arthroplasty508 (3.7)364 (4.4)
  HRA: Revision total hip arthroplasty856 (6.2)592 (7.2)
  KRA: Primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty735 (2.7)580 (2.3)
  KRA: Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty15,784 (57.8)12,869 (50.3)
  KRA: Bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty9,600 (35.2)11,169 (43.7)
  KRA: Revision partial knee arthroplasty364 (1.3)334 (1.3)
  KRA: Revision total knee arthroplasty822 (3.0)625 (2.4)
 Anesthesia§<0.001<0.001
  Regional anesthesia11,209 (80.8)6,450 (78.1)24,512 (89.8)23,744 (92.8)
  General anesthesia2,659 (19.2)1,809 (21.9)2,793 (10.2)1,833 (7.2)
 RBC transfusion (unit)
  Mean±SD3.5±2.84.0±3.1<0.0013.5±2.14.3±2.7<0.001
  02,198 (15.8)1,205 (14.6)<0.0015,498 (20.1)3,782 (14.8)<0.001
  0<RBC≤37,520 (54.2)3,792 (45.9)12,948 (47.4)9,918 (38.8)
  >34,150 (29.9)3,262 (39.5)8,859 (32.4)11,877 (46.4)
 Platelet transfusion (unit)
  Mean±SD8.7±13.77.4±11.20.7286.3±8.96.1±9.7<0.001
  012,802 (92.3)7,535 (91.2)<0.00126,612 (97.5)25,110 (98.2)<0.001
  0<Platelet concentrate≤3521 (3.8)341 (4.1)389 (1.4)263 (1.0)
  3<Platelet concentrate≤10293 (2.1)246 (3.0)190 (0.7)141 (0.6)
  >10252 (1.8)137 (1.7)114 (0.4)63 (0.2)
 Duration of anesthesia (hr)
  Mean±SD2.9±2.03.0±2.10.2422.9±1.72.7±1.7<0.001
  <2.52,188 (15.8)1,223 (14.8)0.0053,124 (11.4)3,994 (15.6)<0.001
  2.5≤duration<46,845 (49.4)4,262 (51.6)9,843 (36.0)7,912 (30.9)
  ≥44,810 (34.7)2,767 (33.5)14,044 (51.4)13,660 (53.4)

†Independent t-test for continuous variables; †Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables; ‡Age at Index date of arthroplasty; §Defined as general anesthesia if inhalant was used; ∥No record of anesthesia duration : hip (n=32), Knee (n=305).

The overall incidence of VTE, DVT, and PE during the 90 days after HRA was 3.9% (853 of 22,127), 2.7% (597 of 22,127), and 1.5% (327 of 22,127), respectively. During hospitalization, 70.3% of VTE, 69.7% of DVT, 66.7% of PE developed. After KRA, the incidence of VTE, DVT, and PE during 90 days was 3.8% (1,990 of 52,882), 3.2% (1,699 of 52,882), and 0.7% (355 of 52,882). During hospitalization, 77.7% of VTE, 79.5% of DVT, and 63.7% of PE developed (Table 2).
Table 2

Incidence of VTE in hospitalization and within 90 days after hip and knee replacement

Type of surgeryWithin 90 days after surgeryIn hospitalization
VTEP value*DVTP value*PEP value*VTEP value*DVTP value*PEP value*
Hip (n=22,127)853 (3.9%)597 (2.7%)327 (1.5%)600 (2.7%)416(1.9%)218 (1.0%)
 Primary hip hemiarthroplasty (n=12,655)572 (4.5%)<0.001358 (2.8%)0.040266 (2.1%)<0.001381 (3.0%)0.002232 (1.8%)0.028175 (1.4%)<0.001
 Primary total hip arthroplasty (n=7,152)203 (2.8%)173 (2.4%)42 (0.6%)157 (2.2%)132 (1.8%)30 (0.4%)
 Revision hip arthroplasty (n=1,448)58 (4.0%)51 (3.5%)12 (0.8%)47 (3.2%)41 (2.8%)8 (0.6%)
Knee (n=52,882)1,990 (3.8%)1,699 (3.2%)355 (0.7%)1547 (2.9%)1,351(2.6%)226 (0.4%)
 Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (n=28,653)1,119 (3.9%)<0.001966 (3.4%)<0.001186 (0.6%)0.097867 (3.0%)<0.001769 (2.7%)<0.001114 (0.4%)0.293
 Bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (n=20,769)785 (3.8%)663 (3.2%)149 (0.7%)615 (3.0%)528 (2.5%)100 (0.5%)
 Primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (n=1,315)14 (1.1%)11 (0.8%)4 (0.3%)11 (0.8%)8 (0.6%)3 (0.2%)
 Revision knee arthroplasty (n=1,447)57 (3.9%)45 (3.1%)15 (1.0%)42 (2.9%)35 (2.4%)8 (0.6%)
Overall (n=75,009)2,843 (3.8%)2,296 (3.1%)682 (0.9%)2,147 (2.9%)1,767 (2.4%)444 (0.6%)

*Chi-square homogeneous test for comparing the incidence among types of arthroplasties within the category of hip or knee. VTE, Venous thromboembolism; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; PE, Pulmonary embolism.

Postoperative VTE and PE occurred the most frequently after primary hip hemiarthroplasty; and the incidence of DVT was the highest after revision hip arthroplasty. PE incidence after hemiarthroplasty was more than twice that of primary total or revision hip arthroplasty. VTE incidence after KRA was similar among unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty, bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty, and revision knee arthroplasty. DVT occurred the most frequently after unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty; and PE incidence was the highest after revision knee arthroplasty. VTE, DVT and PE incidence of primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was the lowest among various types of knee surgery (Table 2). Chemoprophylaxis was used for VTE prevention more frequently in KRA (48.4%) than in HRA (37.3%). The incidence of VTE of the group with chemoprophylaxis was compared with that of the group without chemoprophylaxis. VTE, DVT and PE incidence was significantly higher in the group with chemoprophylaxis. Every incidence by the type of surgery was higher in chemoprophylaxis group except for PE incidence after the revision knee arthroplasty (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of the VTE incidence according to chemoprophylaxis use after hip and knee replacement

Type of surgeryVTEDVTPE
ChemoprophylaxisP value*ChemoprophylaxisP value*ChemoprophylaxisP value*
(-)(+)(-)(+)(-)(+)
Hip (n = 22,127)274 (2.0%)579 (7.0%)< 0.001177 (1.35%)420 (5.1%)< 0.001121 (0.9%)206 (2.5%)< 0.001
 Primary hip hemiarthroplasty198 (2.4%)374 (8.5%)< 0.001116 (1.4%)242 (5.5%)< 0.001102 (1.2%)164 (3.7%)< 0.001
 Primary total hip arthroplasty58 (1.4%)145 (5.0%)< 0.00146 (1.1%)127 (4.4%)< 0.00115 (0.4%)27 (0.9%)0.002
 Revision total hip arthroplasty13 (1.5%)45 (7.6%)< 0.00111 (1.3%)40 (6.8%)< 0.0013 (0.4%)9 (1.5%)0.016
Knee (n = 52,882)406 (1.5%)1,584 (6.2%)< 0.001326 (1.2%)1,373 (5.4%)< 0.001103 (0.4%)252 (1.0%)< 0.001
 Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty250 (1.6%)869 (6.8%)< 0.001201 (1.3%)765 (5.9%)< 0.00158 (0.4%)128 (1.0%)< 0.001
 Bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty132 (1.4%)653 (5.8%)< 0.001107 (1.1%)556 (5.0%)< 0.00136 (0.4%)113 (1.0%)< 0.001
 Primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty2 (0.3%)12 (2.1%)0.0022 (0.3%)9 (1.6%)0.0140 (0.0%)4 (0.7%)0.038
 Revision knee arthroplasty20 (2.4%)37 (5.9%)< 0.00114 (1.7%)31 (5.0%)< 0.0019 (1.1%)6 (1.0%)0.802
Overall (n = 75,009)680 (1.7%)2,163 (6.4%)<0.001503 (1.2%)1,793 (5.3%)<0.001224 (0.5%)458 (1.4%)<0.001

*Chi-square homogeneous test for comparing the incidence between chemoprophylaxis (-) group and chemoprophylaxis (+) group; †Fisher' exact test. VTE, Venous thromboembolism; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; PE, Pulmonary embolism.

The incidence of VTE, DVT, and PE after HKRA was significantly higher in patients who had previous VTE history, chronic heart failure, arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation than those in patients who did not have those risk factors (Tables 4 and 5). Previous VTE history was the strongest risk factor of VTE and PE for both HRA (OR, 10.8 and 9.7) and KRA (OR, 8.5 and 8.6).
Table 4

Incidence of VTE after hip replacement in patients with significant risk factors

Risk factorsVTEDVTPE
No. (%)OR (CI)P value*No. (%)OR (CI)P value*No. (%)OR (CI)P value*
VTE history
 Yes (n = 317)121 (19.4)10.8 (8.4-13.8)< 0.00184 (13.4)9.2 (6.9-12.0)< 0.00153 (8.5)9.7 (6.9-13.5)< 0.001
 No (n = 13,551)732 (3.4)513 (2.4)274 (1.3)
Chronic heart failure
 Yes (n = 1,012)114 (6.3)2.1 (1.7-2.6)< 0.00163 (3.5)1.5 (1.2-2.0)0.00258 (3.2)2.8 (2.1-3.8)< 0.001
 No (n = 12,856)739 (3.6)534 (2.6)269 (1.3)
Arrhythmia
 Yes (n = 828)84 (5.8)1.8 (1.4-2.2)< 0.00156 (3.8)1.7 (1.2-2.2)< 0.00138 (2.6)2.1 (1.5-3.0)< 0.001
 No (n = 13,040)769 (3.7)541 (2.6)289 (1.4)
Atrial fibllation
 Yes (n = 455)78 (8.3)3.4 (2.6-4.4)< 0.00146 (4.9)2.6 (1.9-3.6)< 0.00142 (4.5)4.7 (3.3-6.6)< 0.001
 No (n = 13,413)775 (3.7)551 (2.6)285 (1.3)

*Chi-square test for comparing the incidence between patients with and without disease history. VTE, Venous thromboembolism; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; PE, Pulmonary embolism.

Table 5

Incidence of VTE after knee replacement in patients with significant risk factors

Risk factorsVTEDVTPE
No. (%)OR (CI)P value*No. (%)OR (CI)P value*No. (%)OR (CI)P value*
VTE history
 Yes (n = 644)241 (17.2)8.5 (7.2-10.1)< 0.001199 (14.2)7.5 (6.3-9.0)< 0.00157 (4.1)8.6 (6.3-11.6)< 0.001
 No (n = 26,661)1,749 (3.4)1,500 (2.9)298 (0.6)
Chronic heart failure
 Yes (n = 2,003)182 (4.8)1.3 (1.1-1.5)0.001132 (3.5)1.1 (0.9-1.3)0.47962 (1.6)2.7 (2.0-3.6)< 0.001
 No (n = 25,302)1,808 (3.7)1,567 (3.2)293 (0.6)
Arrhythmia
 Yes (n = 1,862)206 (5.5)1.7 (1.4-1.9)< 0.001172 (4.6)1.6 (1.3-1.9)< 0.00145 (1.2)2.0 (1.4-2.8)< 0.001
 No (n = 25,443)1,784 (3.6)1,527 (3.1)310 (0.6)
Atrial fibllation
 Yes (n = 736)101 (6.8)2.1 (1.7-2.6)< 0.00178 (5.2)1.8 (1.4-2.3)< 0.00129 (2.0)3.3 (2.2-4.9)< 0.001
 No (n = 26,569)1,889 (3.7)1,621 (3.2)326 (0.6)

*Chi-square test for comparing the incidence between patients with and without disease history. VTE, Venous thromboembolism; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; PE, Pulmonary embolism.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of clinically relevant VTE, DVT and PE following HKRA was 3.8%, 3.1%, and 0.9%, respectively in the present study. More than half of the VTEs occurred during hospitalization. DVT was found more frequently after KRA whereas the incidence of PE after HRA was higher than that after KRA. Chemoprophylaxis was done for VTE prevention more frequently in KRA than HRA. The difference between prophylaxis and non-prophylaxis group makes it difficult to draw firm conclusion on the matter of routinely using chemoprophylaxis. Incidence of postoperative VTE varies extensively in the literature, not only by ethnic differences and the characteristics of the population, but also by the diagnostic modalities such as venography, CT scan, or duplex ultrasonography, presence of symptoms, the location of the thrombosis, the postoperative monitoring duration, and the use of mechanical preventive devices. The results may have been biased similarly in this study. With all these limitations considered, however, the most important finding was that the incidence of VTE, DVT and PE was not low compared to the incidence in other Asian or Western population studies. This interpretation is mainly based upon the high incidence of VTE in the group of patients who received chemoprophylaxis. The incidence of VTE and DVT that was 7.0%, 5.1% for HRA and 6.2%, 5.4% for KRA, and the incidence of PE that was 2.5% and 1.0% was comparable to those in the high incidence population in the literature. VTE incidence after HKRA decreased dramatically in the past two to three decades and several recent studies showed 0.5%-4.5% PE rate after HRA and 0.0~1.0% after KRA without chemoprophylaxis (11). Even lower rates were shown in a systematic review where symptomatic VTE and PE were 0.5%-1.1% and 0.1%-0.3% respectively with chemoprophylaxis (1). A Western population-based registry data has shown clinically significant VTE as 2.3% after total hip arthroplasty and 1.8% after total knee arthroplasty (12). A meta-analysis of Asian population studies revealed the pooled rate of proximal DVT as 8.9% using venography and 5.9% by ultrasonography (13). Symptomatic PE was 0.6% in the same study. Overall VTE in this study included events diagnosed with various modalities although they lacked specific information for individual patient. As indicated in other studies with similar methodology, HIRA database has also possibilities that clinicians had diagnosed the patients as having VTE by clinical suspicion only, not by using objective diagnostic methods (14). Along with the possible overestimation of the VTE incidence, there is also possibility of underestimation in this study as there was no way to identify the number of undiagnosed VTE in the population. The observed VTE incidence in the group without prophylaxis was comparable with the relatively low incidence from several Asian studies. A meta-analysis showed a pooled incidence rate as low as 5.8% for proximal DVT diagnosed by venography and 1.9% for symptomatic DVT after KRA in Asian patients which coincides with the results of non-prophylaxis group in the present study (6). Recent Asian studies showed that the incidence of all DVT was 8%-49% in patients not receiving chemoprophylaxis (15,16,17). The relatively low incidence of VTE in Asian studies has prompted the disagreement on routine chemoprophylaxis after HKRA (181920). The low incidence of VTE in Asians is known to be attributed to the low incidence of obesity and hyperlipidemia as well as the scarcity of some genetic factors (419). The current practice includes early postoperative mobilization, the use of stockings and pneumatic compression pumps which may help prevent VTE (2122). Given that the rate of symptomatic PE and sudden death are the ultimate targets of VTE prophylaxis and whether an ethnic difference in the incidence of PE exists is still inconclusive, it is vital to explore the incidence of these parameters. The incidence of fatal PE in Western studies appears to have decreased dramatically when compared to the past records due to early mobilization. In one study by Charnley, the PE was 7.8%, despite various approaches of chemical prophylaxis (23). Reported estimates of symptomatic PE in a more recent meta-analysis with Western populations were 0%-1.5% after HRA and 0%-1.3% after KRA with or without chemoprophylaxis (2425). Data of the Scottish Arthroplasty Registry revealed an incidence of fatal PE during 90 days was 0.2% after HRA and 0.2% after KRA (12). Several studies conducted in the United Kingdom with over 1,000 patients reported rates of fatal PE varying from 0.1%-0.4% without chemical prophylaxis after HKRA (2627). For Asian subjects, two large-scale trials reported rates of symptomatic PE as 0.5% and 0.4% (78). Two recent meta-analyses showed that the rate of symptomatic PE was 0.6% (0%-2.5%) and 0.01% (0.01%-2.9%) (613). The observed PE incidence ranging from 0.0 to 3.7% in the present study corresponded to approximately one third that of VTE and this incidence was not low regardless of chemoprophylaxis. The PE incidence in the patients with prophylaxis was rather comparable to that reported in numerous earlier Western studies, whether they were symptomatic or not. It is notable that overall VTE incidence during 90 days was lower after KRA than after HRA. Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty and revision surgery of the knee carried a higher risk of VTE and PE occurrence than total hip replacement surgery, revision hip replacement arthroplasty and other type of knee replacement surgeries. Higher incidence of overall VTE after KRA than HRA has been demonstrated in many Western and Asian populations studies (17828). High incidence of VTE and PE in bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty is explained in part by the fact that it corresponds to the surgery for hip fracture. Hip fracture surgery has shown greater risk for VTE than THA (78). We also should note that the gap between HRA and KRA became smaller or the rates were reversed concerning proximal or symptomatic DVT or PE in those studies (1213). It may be due to the size and location of thrombi and postoperative mobilization. The size of their thrombi were smaller and less occlusive after KRA, which caused fewer symptoms than HRA (29). Another finding was that 20% to 35% of VTE occurred after discharge from the hospital. It has already been proposed that the prophylaxis must be continued after discharge as the risk persists. This vigilance is heightened if the hospitalization is rather short-term as in most western countries where the DVT prophylaxis is mainly post-discharge procedure. The exact duration and selection criteria of at-risk patients for post-discharge chemoprophylaxis, however, is uncertain. The current ACCP thromboprophylaxis guideline recommends extension of prophylactic period for up to 35 days (30). Duration of chemoprophylaxis should be determined considering the cumulative incidence of postoperative VTE that changes with prophylaxis. There is general agreement that the risk of VTE is the highest soon after HKRA during hospitalization and the incidence of asymptomatic DVT decreases as the duration of postoperative prophylaxis increases (31). We should also consider the duration of hospitalization in Asian studies is generally longer than that reported in Western studies. In an Asian multicenter study including 835 patients, no symptomatic VTE occurrence was evident between hospital discharge and 3 months after surgical procedure, in which study the duration of hospital stay was 12-15 days (8). In the current study, the mean duration of hospital stay was 19.2 days for primary total hip replacement arthroplasty and 20.2 days for total knee replacement arthroplasty including bilateral cases. Previous history of VTE, chronic heart failure, arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation were risk factors identified in this study. They are well known factors from other studies (32). The odds ratio of the incidence of VTE for patients with previous VTE history in this study was 10.8 after HRA and 8.5 for KRA patients when compared to subjects without VTE history. This finding justifies the routine use of chemical prophylaxis for those selected patients. However, the individualized therapy that depends on risk factors has not yet been endorsed in western guidelines because the risk of orthopedic replacement surgery far outweighs patient-specific factors. A study conducted before 1990 reported that 'hospitalization with recent surgery' resulted in an odds ratio of 22 (33). The current clinical practice guidelines by the Korean Society of Thrombus and Hemostasis in 2014 stratified the joint replacement surgery as moderate risk group with weak recommendation of prophylaxis whereas they stratified the joint replacement surgery with previous VTE as high risk group (34). This study has several limitations and weaknesses. The inherent limitation was that the evaluation of data relied solely on the EDI code input by the individual hospital; and the integrity of the information in the registry may vary depending on each hospital. The integrity of the data had been tested by correlating the authentic data in individual hospital and the input information, but the correlation was not possible. Also, only the items to be reimbursed by the insurance were involved, which meant that mechanical prophylaxis including pneumatic pumps and stockings was not included as they were not reimbursed by the insurance coverage. Subsequent over- or under-estimation of VTE incidence due to various factors is the serious limitation of this study. The data did not include the exact date and time of prophylaxis initiation, duration of prophylactic treatment, or the date of surgery. The timing of prophylactic treatment initiation can affect the efficacy of the anticoagulation along with the incidence of bleeding after hip surgery (35). Body mass index was not estimated as weight or height had not been recorded in the registry. Symptom severity of each patient was evaluated by the surgeon of each hospital and the criteria for positive symptomatic DVT or PE was not standardized. In conclusion, this nationwide database enables an estimation of the incidence of total venous thromboembolic disease occurring in Korea after HKRA. The incidence of VTEs in this retrospective review was not low compared with the results of the studies targeting other Asian and Caucasian populations. It may warrant routine prevention including employment of chemoprophylaxis. However, the inconsistency and limitation of the data indicates true incidence may not have been revealed regardless of potential risks. A nationwide prospective investigation involving a large-scale controlled trial is required to affirm this reviewed data and to develop the necessary recommendations.
  35 in total

1.  Early mobilisation after conventional knee replacement may reduce the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  E O Pearse; B F Caldwell; R J Lockwood; J Hollard
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-03

2.  Is routine chemical thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement really necessary in a Japanese population?

Authors:  R Yokote; M Matsubara; N Hirasawa; S Hagio; K Ishii; C Takata
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

3.  Venous thromboembolism associated with hip and knee replacement over a ten-year period: a population-based study.

Authors:  C Howie; H Hughes; A C Watts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-12

4.  Epidemiology of post-operative venous thromboembolism in Asian patients. Results of the SMART venography study.

Authors:  Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G H Westrich; S B Haas; P Mosca; M Peterson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

6.  Incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism after 1,390 knee arthroplasties without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, except in high-risk cases.

Authors:  S Ansari; D Warwick; C E Ackroyd; J H Newman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Pulmonary embolism and its prophylaxis following the Charnley total hip replacement.

Authors:  R Johnson; J R Green; J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgery.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  The incidence of deep vein thrombosis after hip and knee arthroplasties in Japanese patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Sudo; T Sano; K Horikawa; T Yamakawa; D Shi; A Uchida
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.118

10.  The value of D-dimer in the detection of early deep-vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty in Asian patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Chung-Jen Chen; Ching-Jen Wang; Chung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2008-05-28
View more
  13 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis With New Oral Anticoagulants is Superior to LMWH in Hip Arthroplasty Surgery: Findings from the Swedish Registry.

Authors:  Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Effects of antihypertensive drugs on surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a nationwide population-based claim study.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Hae Yeon Park; Minsu Park; Mi Yang; Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

3.  Risk of revision in UKA versus HTO: a nationwide propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Jae-Doo Yoo; Min-Hwan Huh; Young-Soo Shin
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  Is venous thromboembolism prophylaxis beneficial in upper limb major joint replacement surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Kadhum; Abdel Rahim Elniel; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-13

5.  Postoperative Ultrasound Guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Blockade for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of 0.125% Bupivacaine and 0.2% Ropivacaine.

Authors:  Sruthi C Babu; Gokuldas Menon; Bindu K Vasu; Mathew George; Jai Thilak; Sundaram Iyer
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  CT venography after knee replacement surgery: comparison of dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging and single-energy metal artifact reduction techniques on a 320-row CT scanner.

Authors:  Masafumi Kidoh; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Kenichiro Hirata; Masahiro Hatemura; Tomohiro Namimoto; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Practical Utility of D-dimer Test for Venous Thromboembolism in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Depends on Disease Activity: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yoon Jeong Oh; Eun Hye Park; Jun Won Park; Yeong Wook Song; Eun Bong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  An Update on Venous Thromboembolism Rates and Prophylaxis in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in 2020.

Authors:  Daniel C Santana; Ahmed K Emara; Melissa N Orr; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera; Viktor E Krebs; Robert M Molloy; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Fondaparinux vs. enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Dong; Hui-Juan Qian; Yan Qian; Ling Zhou; San-Lian Hu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  A dedicated anticoagulation clinic does not improve postoperative management of warfarin after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joshua S Bingham; Christopher G Salib; Kyle Labban; Zachary Morrison; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.