Literature DB >> 36264509

Risk of revision in UKA versus HTO: a nationwide propensity score-matched study.

Jae-Doo Yoo1, Min-Hwan Huh1, Young-Soo Shin2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our study aims to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors for subsequent revision in patients treated with UKA compared with those treated with HTO.
METHODS: In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we used data from the Korean National Health Insurance claims database from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2017. We compared patients who had undergone UKA or HTO as the primary surgical procedure longer than two years prior. We used multivariable logistic regression models to compare risk of revision between the groups after propensity matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Revision was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after primary UKA or HTO.
RESULTS: In this study, 73,902 patients with UKA and 72,215 patients with HTO were identified after applying IPTW. The risk of revision during the entire study period was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42). Kaplan-Meier 8-years survival was 96.8% in the UKA group and 95.1% in the HTO group. Patients with HTO who were at higher risk of revision had advanced age (60-69 years [HR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.76-2.67] and 70-79 years [HR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.81-4.62]), female sex (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.66), CHF (HR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.25-7.78), COPD (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.34-2.10), PVD (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.10-2.78), and CVA or TIA (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.13-3.08) compared with those with UKA.
CONCLUSION: Risk of revision was higher for patients with HTO than for patients with UKA. Risk factors for subsequent revision in patients with HTO were advanced age (60-69, 70-79), female sex, and comorbidities such as CHF, COPD, PVD, CVA, or TIA. However, orthopedic surgeons should also consider that TKA conversion from UKA has higher risk of revision than TKA conversion from HTO before choosing between UKA and HTO.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; High tibial osteotomy; Revision; Risk factors; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264509     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04658-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  39 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of Long-Term Survival Analysis Between Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Quan He Jin; Won-Gyun Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Cheng Jin; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Survival and functional outcome of high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: a 10-20-year cohort study.

Authors:  A F Y van Wulfften Palthe; N D Clement; O P P Temmerman; B J Burger
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 4.  High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Current Concept.

Authors:  Soheil Sabzevari; Adel Ebrahimpour; Mostafa Khalilipour Roudi; Amir R Kachooei
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  ZhenWu Cao; XiuJun Mai; Jun Wang; EnHui Feng; YongMing Huang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon's caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Schraknepper; Dimitris Dimitriou; Naeder Helmy; Julian Hasler; Stephan Radzanowski; Andreas Flury
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The compartmental distribution of knee osteoarthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J C Stoddart; O Dandridge; A Garner; J Cobb; R J van Arkel
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review.

Authors:  Marcel Budhi Santoso; Lidong Wu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Differences in preoperative planning for high-tibial osteotomy between the standing and supine positions.

Authors:  Takehiko Matsushita; Shu Watanabe; Daisuke Araki; Kanto Nagai; Yuichi Hoshino; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Takahiro Niikura; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-03-01

Review 10.  Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.