Literature DB >> 26769908

VGC ANALYZER: A SOFTWARE FOR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FULLY CROSSED MULTIPLE-READER MULTIPLE-CASE VISUAL GRADING CHARACTERISTICS STUDIES.

Magnus Båth1, Jonny Hansson2.   

Abstract

Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis is a non-parametric rank-invariant method for analysis of visual grading data. In VGC analysis, image quality ratings for two different conditions are compared by producing a VGC curve, similar to how the ratings for normal and abnormal cases in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis are used to create an ROC curve. The use of established ROC software for the analysis of VGC data has therefore previously been proposed. However, the ROC analysis is based on the assumption of independence between normal and abnormal cases. In VGC analysis, this independence cannot always be assumed, e.g. if the ratings are based on the same patients imaged under both conditions. A dedicated software intended for analysis of VGC studies, which takes possible dependencies between ratings into account in the statistical analysis of a VGC study, has therefore been developed. The software-VGC Analyzer-determines the area under the VGC curve and its uncertainty using non-parametric resampling techniques. This article gives an introduction to VGC Analyzer, describes the types of analyses that can be performed and instructs the user about the input and output data.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26769908     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.

Authors:  Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba; Patrycja Baran; Yakov I Nesterets; Serena Pacile; Susanne Wienbeck; Christian Dullin; Konstantin Pavlov; Anton Maksimenko; Darren Lockie; Sheridan C Mayo; Harry M Quiney; Diego Dreossi; Fulvia Arfelli; Giuliana Tromba; Sarah Lewis; Timur E Gureyev; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dependency of image quality on acquisition protocol and image processing in chest tomosynthesis-a visual grading study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Masoud Jadidi; Magnus Båth; Sven Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Tantalum-specific contrast-to-noise ratio or conventional detector dose-driven exposure control in angiography: radiation dose and image quality evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Thomas Werncke; Timo Christian Meine; Jan B Hinrichs; Sabine K Maschke; Lena Sophie Becker; Inga Brüsch; Regina Rumpel; Frank K Wacker; Bernhard C Meyer
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.

Authors:  Julia Krammer; Sergei Zolotarev; Inge Hillman; Konstantinos Karalis; Dzmitry Stsepankou; Valeriy Vengrinovich; Jürgen Hesser; Tony M Svahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Visualization of wrist anatomy-a comparison between 7T and 3T MRI.

Authors:  Simon Götestrand; Anders Björkman; Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher; Ingvar Kristiansson; Elenya Aksyuk; Pawel Szaro; Karin Markenroth Bloch; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  VISIBILITY OF STRUCTURES OF RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS: INFLUENCE OF ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND OBSERVER EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  Carin Meltzer; Magnus Båth; Susanne Kheddache; Helga Ásgeirsdóttir; Marita Gilljam; Åse Allansdotter Johnsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Can iterative reconstruction algorithms replace tube loading compensation in low kVp hepatic CT? Subjective versus objective image quality.

Authors:  Fredrik Holmquist; Marcus Söderberg; Ulf Nyman; Tobias Fält; Roger Siemund; Mats Geijer
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.