Shenqiang Yan1, Qingmeng Chen1, Mengjun Xu1, Jianzhong Sun1, David S Liebeskind1, Min Lou2. 1. From the Department of Neurology (S.Y., Q.C., M.X., M.L.) and Radiology (J.S.), The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; and Department of Neurology, University of California-Los Angeles Stroke Center (D.S.L.). 2. From the Department of Neurology (S.Y., Q.C., M.X., M.L.) and Radiology (J.S.), The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; and Department of Neurology, University of California-Los Angeles Stroke Center (D.S.L.). loumingxc@vip.sina.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies revealed a close relationship between thrombus length and recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). As a novel approach, we prospectively adjusted the order of sequence acquisition to obtain delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1 (dGE-T1) and thereby assess thrombus length on dGE-T1 to evaluate its predictive value for recanalization after IVT. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected clinical and imaging data from acute ischemic stroke patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who underwent multimodal magnetic resonance imaging before and 24 hours after IVT. Perfusion-weighted imaging was performed followed by conventional T1. We measured thrombus length on dGE-T1 and examined its association with middle cerebral artery recanalization. RESULTS: Of the included 74 patients, the median age was 66 years and 28 (37.8%) were women. Thrombus length was 8.18±4.56 mm on dGE-T1, which was an acceptable predictor for no recanalization (odds ratio, 1.196; 95% confidence interval, 1.015-1.409; P=0.033), with a receiver-operator characteristic of 0.732 (95% confidence interval, 0.619-0.845; P=0.001). The optimal cut-off point was identified at 6.77 mm, which yielded a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 57.9%, and an odds ratio of 4.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.742-13.292; P=0.002). Moreover, no one achieved recanalization after IVT when length of thrombus exceeded 14 mm on dGE-T1. CONCLUSIONS: The dGE-T1, obtained by simply adjusting scanning order in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging protocol, is a useful tool for thrombus length estimation and middle cerebral artery recanalization prediction after IVT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies revealed a close relationship between thrombus length and recanalization rate after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). As a novel approach, we prospectively adjusted the order of sequence acquisition to obtain delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1 (dGE-T1) and thereby assess thrombus length on dGE-T1 to evaluate its predictive value for recanalization after IVT. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected clinical and imaging data from acute ischemic strokepatients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who underwent multimodal magnetic resonance imaging before and 24 hours after IVT. Perfusion-weighted imaging was performed followed by conventional T1. We measured thrombus length on dGE-T1 and examined its association with middle cerebral artery recanalization. RESULTS: Of the included 74 patients, the median age was 66 years and 28 (37.8%) were women. Thrombus length was 8.18±4.56 mm on dGE-T1, which was an acceptable predictor for no recanalization (odds ratio, 1.196; 95% confidence interval, 1.015-1.409; P=0.033), with a receiver-operator characteristic of 0.732 (95% confidence interval, 0.619-0.845; P=0.001). The optimal cut-off point was identified at 6.77 mm, which yielded a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 57.9%, and an odds ratio of 4.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.742-13.292; P=0.002). Moreover, no one achieved recanalization after IVT when length of thrombus exceeded 14 mm on dGE-T1. CONCLUSIONS: The dGE-T1, obtained by simply adjusting scanning order in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging protocol, is a useful tool for thrombus length estimation and middle cerebral artery recanalization prediction after IVT.
Authors: Shreyansh Shah; Marie Luby; Karen Poole; Teresa Morella; Elizabeth Keller; Richard T Benson; John K Lynch; Zurab Nadareishvili; Amie W Hsia Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Flacke; H Urbach; E Keller; F Träber; A Hartmann; J Textor; J Gieseke; W Block; P J Folkers; H H Schild Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tudor G Jovin; Angel Chamorro; Erik Cobo; María A de Miquel; Carlos A Molina; Alex Rovira; Luis San Román; Joaquín Serena; Sonia Abilleira; Marc Ribó; Mònica Millán; Xabier Urra; Pere Cardona; Elena López-Cancio; Alejandro Tomasello; Carlos Castaño; Jordi Blasco; Lucía Aja; Laura Dorado; Helena Quesada; Marta Rubiera; María Hernandez-Pérez; Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Rüdiger von Kummer; Miquel Gallofré; Antoni Dávalos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian H Riedel; Philip Zimmermann; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Robert Stingele; Günther Deuschl; Olav Jansen Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Muneer Eesa; Jeremy L Rempel; John Thornton; Daniel Roy; Tudor G Jovin; Robert A Willinsky; Biggya L Sapkota; Dar Dowlatshahi; Donald F Frei; Noreen R Kamal; Walter J Montanera; Alexandre Y Poppe; Karla J Ryckborst; Frank L Silver; Ashfaq Shuaib; Donatella Tampieri; David Williams; Oh Young Bang; Blaise W Baxter; Paul A Burns; Hana Choe; Ji-Hoe Heo; Christine A Holmstedt; Brian Jankowitz; Michael Kelly; Guillermo Linares; Jennifer L Mandzia; Jai Shankar; Sung-Il Sohn; Richard H Swartz; Philip A Barber; Shelagh B Coutts; Eric E Smith; William F Morrish; Alain Weill; Suresh Subramaniam; Alim P Mitha; John H Wong; Mark W Lowerison; Tolulope T Sajobi; Michael D Hill Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alex Rovira; Patricia Orellana; Jose Alvarez-Sabín; Juan F Arenillas; Xavier Aymerich; Elisenda Grivé; Carlos Molina; Antoni Rovira-Gols Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-06-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Osama O Zaidat; Albert J Yoo; Pooja Khatri; Thomas A Tomsick; Rüdiger von Kummer; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael P Marks; Shyam Prabhakaran; David F Kallmes; Brian-Fred M Fitzsimmons; J Mocco; Joanna M Wardlaw; Stanley L Barnwell; Tudor G Jovin; Italo Linfante; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael J Alexander; Joshua A Hirsch; Max Wintermark; Gregory Albers; Henry H Woo; Donald V Heck; Michael Lev; Richard Aviv; Werner Hacke; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Colin P Derdeyn; Anthony Furlan; Raul G Nogueira; Dileep R Yavagal; Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Martin Bendszus; David S Liebeskind Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Robert T Kleven; Kunal B Karani; Nicole Hilvert; Samantha M Ford; Karla P Mercado-Shekhar; John M Racadio; Marepalli B Rao; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yanzheng Li; Wei Wang; Hang Yang; Weiheng Guo; Jingyu Feng; Dejiu Yang; Li Guo; Guojun Tan Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 1.573
Authors: Boram Gu; Yu Huang; Emily Louise Manchester; Alun D Hughes; Simon A McG Thom; Rongjun Chen; Xiao Yun Xu Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 4.200