Literature DB >> 26767866

Advanced chronic kidney disease: a strong risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection.

Sun Chul Kim1, Min Young Seo1, Jun Yong Lee1, Ki Tae Kim1, Eunjung Cho1, Myung-Gyu Kim1, Sang-Kyung Jo1, Won-Yong Cho1, Hyoung-Kyu Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It has been suggested that chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and is associated with increased mortality among patients infected with C. difficile. However, recent studies of the clinical impact of CKD on CDI in Asians are still insufficient. We sought to determine the relationship between CKD and CDI in a Korean population.
METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective case-control study. In total, 171 patients with CDI were included as cases and 342 age- and gender-matched patients without CDI were used as controls. We compared the prevalence of CKD in the study sample and identified independent risk factors that could predict the development or prognosis of CDI.
RESULTS: Independent risk factors for CDI included stage IV to V CKD not requiring dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 2.90) and end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (OR, 3.34). Patients with more advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30) and CDI showed higher in-hospital mortality and poorer responses to the initial metronidazole therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: More advanced CKD is an independent risk factor for CDI and is associated with higher in-hospital mortality and poor treatment responses in CDI patients. Thus, in CKD patients, careful attention should be paid to the occurrence of CDI and its management to improve the outcome of CDI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile; Dialysis; Renal insufficiency, chronic; Risk factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26767866      PMCID: PMC4712416          DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.31.1.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Intern Med        ISSN: 1226-3303            Impact factor:   2.884


INTRODUCTION

Several studies have investigated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI); antibiotic use, older age, gastric acid suppression therapy, admission to a healthcare facility, immunosuppression, and prolonged hospitalization have been identified [1-5]. The pathogenesis of CDI includes the transformation of the intestinal microbiota resulting from antibiotic use, pathogenic toxin production, and altered host inflammatory responses [6]. Since 2003, the propagation of a new strain of C. difficile, known as B1/NAP/027, has been reported in the United States (US), Canada, and Europe; the frequency of CDI with high recurrence and mortality rates has increased since [7-9]. In chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, gastric acid suppression, impaired immune funcstion, and increased antibiotic use can contribute to the development of CDI [10-13]. Additionally, recent studies demonstrated altered intestinal microbial flora in CKD patients, especially increased colonization with Clostridium sp., which may be associated with increased CDI [14]. A previous study using a national cohort of hospitalized patients in the US reported that CKD patients have a two-fold higher risk of CDI than non-CKD patients, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients requiring dialysis were at the highest risk of CDI [15]. They also reported that CDI was associated with longer hospital stays and higher mortality in CKD patients. However, the national database did not provide any information about potential confounders, such as antibiotics exposure, CDI treatment, comorbidities, and laboratory parameters. In addition, a case-control study by Eddi et al. [10] showed that ESRD patients requiring dialysis had a higher risk of CDI; however, CKD patients not on dialysis showed no increased risk of CDI. Previous studies investigating the clinical features of CDI in CKD patients not on dialysis have yielded conflicting results, and recent studies of the clinical impact of CKD on CDI in Koreans are still insufficient. We thus examined the association between CKD and CDI using a single-center cohort. We also investigated risk factors that could help predict the development or prognosis of CDI in advanced CKD patients.

METHODS

Study population

This retrospective case-control study was performed at the Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea, and was approved by the Korea University Anam Hospital Institutional Review Board. From the computerized hospital database, we retrieved a list of all patients who had been admitted to the hospital between May 2010 and May 2013 and had tested positive for C. difficile toxin A or B in fecal specimens (TechLab Corp., Blacksburg, VA, USA). All patients who tested positive for C. difficile toxin A or B and had diarrhea were included. As we aimed to study patients admitted with CDI (inpatients), we included only patients who were admitted to our hospital for more than 3 days (in both case and control groups). In total, 219 patients admitted with CDI fulfilled these criteria; however, 48 patients who were receiving chemotherapy or had terminal malignancies with life expectancies of less than 3 months were excluded. Finally, 171 patients were included in the patient group, and twice as many patients who had been admitted during the same period with matching age and gender were included in the control group.

Clinical data

Patient baseline characteristics included the gender, age, history of diabetes and hypertension, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of antibiotics or gastric acid-reducing drugs (GARDs) during the admission, CKD stage at admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. All patients were classified into (1) non-advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), (2) stage III CKD (eGFR = 30 to 59 mL/min/1.73 m2), (3) stage IV to V CKD not requiring dialysis (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or (4) ESRD requiring dialysis according to baseline creatinine level at admission and previous laboratory data within 3 months. The patients who had acute kidney injury (AKI) at admission were not considered to have CKD when their eGFR improved to the normal range (≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patients with AKI on CKD were classified according to previous laboratory data or improved eGFR during admission. In all cases, the eGFR was calculated using the modification of diet in renal disease equation. For subgroup analysis in the CDI patient group, fever (> 38.3°C), hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), AKI, levels of albumin, hemoglobin A1c, and white blood cell (WBC) count when diagnosed with CDI were also recorded. In the subgroup analysis of CDI patients, the data collected on ICU admission in the previous 3 months, and use of antibiotics or GARD in the preceding 6 weeks were based on the date of diagnosis of CDI. For prognostic evaluations, primary treatment regimen, recurrence of CDI, time from admission to diagnosis, time from diagnosis to discharge, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Recurrence of CDI was defined as the recurrence of diarrhea and a positive C. difficile toxin test result within 1 month after the termination of therapy. Treatment resistance was defined as the additional use of vancomycin for CDI treatment due to initial metronidazole resistance.

Statistical analysis

All analyses and calculations were performed using IBM SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range), according to the distribution. Pearson chi-square tests were used to analyze nominal data. Continuous variables of the groups were analyzed using the independent-sample t test or the Mann-Whitney test, according to the distribution. In multivariate analysis, a binary logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs). A p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the CDI patients was 71 years. The mean time from admission to CDI diagnosis was 27.8 days, and most of the patients with CDI were diagnosed with hospital-acquired CDI (96.4%, data not shown). Patients with CDI had a higher prevalence of ICU admissions, emergency admissions, advanced CKD, antibiotics use, and GARD use. The prevalences of ESRD requiring dialysis and CKD stage IV to V not requiring dialysis were significantly higher among CDI patients than among patients without CDI. Patients with CDI had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (median, 43 days vs. 10 days; p < 0.001) and increased in-hospital mortality (8.2% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.006) than patients without CDI.
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the patients

CharacteristicCDI (n = 171)Non-CDI (n = 342)p value
Age, yr71 (57.75–77)71 (58–78)0.907
Male sex86 (50.3)172 (50.3)1.000
History
 Diabetes56 (32.7)94 (27.5)0.219
 Hypertension103 (60.2)175 (51.2)0.060
 ICU admission64 (37.4)58 (17.0)0.000
 Use of any antibiotics157 (91.8)240 (70.2)0.000
 GARD use116 (67.8)200 (58.5)0.043
Advanced CKD (including ESRD) (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)49 (28.7)59 (17.3)0.004
CKD stages< 0.001
 Non-advanced CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)122 (71.3)283 (82.7)
 Stage III CKD17 (9.9)41 (12.0)
 Stage IV–V CKD10 (5.8)8 (2.3)
 ESRD requiring dialysis22 (12.9)10 (2.9)
Reason for admission0.148
 Surgical57 (33.3)137 (40.1)
 Nonsurgical114 (66.7)205 (59.9)
Admission type0.005
 Elective22 (12.9)72 (21.1)
 Urgent43 (25.1)108 (31.6)
 Emergent106 (62.0)162 (47.4)
Length of hospital stay, day43 (21–74)10 (5–19)< 0.001
In-hospital mortality14 (8.2)9 (2.6)0.006

Values are presented as median (confidence interval 25%–75%) or number of patients (%).

CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; ICU, intensive care unit; GARD, gastric acid-reducing drug; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

CKD stage as an independent predictor of CDI

We applied a multivariate logistic regression model with backward elimination to calculate an adjusted OR for CDI in patients with CKD (Table 2). Model 1 was adjusted for all parameters with a p value < 0.10, with the exception of in-hospital mortality in a univariate model, and model 2 with a p value < 0.20. Patients with advanced CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) had an increased risk of CDI in model 1 (OR, 2.10; p = 0.003) and model 2 (adjusted OR, 1.98; p = 0.007). When advanced CKD patients were classified into two groups according to dialysis (CKD stage III to V not on dialysis, ESRD on dialysis), advanced CKD (stage III to V) not on dialysis was not associated with CDI (data not shown). However, when classified into three groups according to CKD stages (CKD stage III, CKD stage IV to V not on dialysis, and ESRD on dialysis), patients with more advanced CKD (stage IV to V) showed a 2.8- to 2.9-fold higher risk of CDI even though they were not on dialysis. Patients with ESRD requiring dialysis were at the highest risk of CDI (OR, 3.34 to 3.68), compared with non-advanced CKD.
Table 2.

Risk-adjusted analysis to evaluate CKD as an independent predictor of Clostridium difficile infection

VariableOdds ratio95% Confidence intervalp value
All advanced CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2)
 Model 1[a]2.101.29–3.420.003
 Model 2[b]1.981.20–3.250.007
CKD stages
 Non-advanced CKD
  Model 1[a]---
  Model 2[b]---
 Stage III CKD
  Model 1[a]1.330.68–2.620.396
  Model 2[b]1.270.64–2.500.485
 Stage IV–V CKD (non-dialysis)
  Model 1[a]2.841.02–7.890.044
  Model 2[b]2.901.01–8.310.048
 ESRD requiring dialysis
  Model 1[a]3.681.58–8.570.003
  Model 2[b]3.341.42–7.870.006

CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.

Model 1 is adjusted for hypertension, intensive care unit admission, use of any antibiotics, gastric acid-reducing drug use, admission type, length of hospital stay.

Model 2 is adjusted for all variables in model 1 plus reason for admission.

Characteristics of CDI patients according to CKD stage

In this study, patients with stage IV to V CKD had a significantly higher risk of CDI (regardless of whether they were undergoing dialysis) than non-advanced CKD patients (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Thus, we further analyzed the CDI characteristics according to CKD stage. For this analysis, CDI patients were classified into two groups based on the eGFR value (> 30 or < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) (Table 3). Patients with more advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and many of these patients were men; moreover, they had significantly higher WBC counts. More advanced CKD was also associated with higher in-hospital mortality. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the use of antibiotics or GARD, the recurrence of CDI, the initial treatment regimen, the length of hospital stay from admission to diagnosis, or the time from diagnosis to discharge. Treatment resistance was significantly higher in the group with more advanced CKD (28.1% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.031).
Table 3.

Characteristics of CDI patients according to the more advanced chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)

CharacteristicCDI patients with eGFR ≥ 30 (n = 139)CDI patients with eGFR < 30 (n = 32)p value
Age, yr74 (64–79)71 (57–74)0.987
Male sex64 (46.0)22 (68.8)0.030
History
 Diabetes43 (30.9)13 (40.6)0.303
 Hypertension74 (53.2)29 (90.6)0.000
 ICU admission in the past 90 days47 (33.8)17 (53.1)0.067
Antibiotic use in the past 42 days
 Use of any antibiotic128 (92.1)29 (90.6)0.728
 Use of two or more antibiotics74 (53.2)15 (46.9)0.560
 Cephalosporin use85 (62.1)22 (66.8)0.544
 Quinolone use46 (33.1)7 (21.9)0.290
 Carbapenem use23 (16.5)2 (6.2)0.172
 Macrolide use6 (4.3)3 (9.4)0.372
 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use7 (5.0)1 (3.1)1.000
 Metronidazole use9 (6.5)1 (3.1)0.690
 Use of antifungal agents10 (7.2)00.211
 Tazocin use24 (17.3)8 (25.0)0.321
 Vancomycin use7 (5.0)1 (3.1)1.000
GARD use in the past 42 days92 (66.2)24 (75.0)0.405
Fever (> 38.3°C)47 (33.8)8 (25.0)0.405
Shock (SBP < 90 mmHg)13 (9.4)4 (12.5)0.528
Acute kidney injury12 (8.6)4 (12.5)0.505
Albumin3.0 (2.7–3.3)2.9 (2.6–3.0)0.175
Hemoglobin A1c5.9 (5.4–6.7)6.0 (5.7–6.6)0.924
WBC count > 15 × 103/µL37 (26.6)16 (50.0)0.018
CDI treatment at diagnosis
 Metronidazole129 (92.8)30 (93.8)1.000
 Vancomycin10 (7.2)2 (6.2)1.000
Switched from metronidazole to vancomycin17 (12.2)9 (28.1)0.031
Recurrence of CDI17 (12.5)4 (14.8)0.755
In-hospital mortality7 (5.0)7 (21.9)0.006
Length of hospital stay, day39.5 (19–68)45 (25–72)0.891
 Time from admission to diagnosis17(8–31)23 (8–38)0.632
 Time from diagnosis to discharge15.5 (6–44)17 (9–38)0.921

Values are presented as median (confidence interval 25%–75%) or number of patients (%).

CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit; GARD, gastric acid-reducing drug; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WBC, white blood cell.

Clinical features of patients with treatment resistance

Patients who experienced treatment resistance to initial metronidazole therapy had significantly higher prevalences of the use of more than two antibiotics, vancomycin use before CDI diagnosis, more advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and higher WBC counts than patients without treatment resistance. The recurrence of CDI was higher in the group with treatment resistance, although this difference was not statistically significant. In-hospital mortality also did not differ between the patients with treatment resistance and those without (Table 4). A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with treatment resistance. All parameters with a p < 0.20 in the univariate model were considered in the multivariate analysis. Considering the previous use of two or more antibiotics, carbapenem use, vancomycin use, WBC count > 15 × 103/μL, and more advanced CKD as variables for the multivariate logistic regression analysis (backward method), the previous use of two or more antibiotics (OR, 3.47; p = 0.020) or vancomycin (OR, 5.64; p = 0.036), WBC count > 15 × 103/μL (OR, 4.11; p = 0.003), and more advanced CKD (OR, 2.83; p = 0.048) were independent risk factors for treatment resistance (Table 5).
Table 4.

Characteristics of CDI patients with treatment resistance

CharacteristicResistant (n = 26)Non-resistant (n = 145)p value
Age, yr73.5 (55.25–75)72 (64–79)0.491
Male sex12 (46.2)74 (51.0)0.676
History
 Diabetes11 (42.3)45 (31.0)0.265
 Hypertension18 (69.2)85 (58.6)0.386
 ICU admission in the past 90 days11 (42.3)53 (36.6)0.661
Antibiotic use in the past 42 days
 Use of any antibiotic26 (100.0)131 (90.3)0.132
 Use of two or more antibiotics20 (86.9)69 (47.6)0.010
 Cephalosporin use19 (73.1)88 (60.7)0.276
 Quinolone use9 (34.6)44 (30.3)0.652
 Carbapenem use7 (26.9)18 (12.4)0.070
 Macrolide use2 (7.7)7 (4.8)0.628
 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use08 (5.5)0.609
 Metronidazole use2 (7.7)8 (5.5)0.650
 Use of antifungal agents2 (7.7)8 (5.5)0.650
 Tazocin use6 (23.1)26 (17.9)0.586
 Vancomycin use4 (15.4)4 (2.8)0.019
GARD use in the past 42 days20 (76.9)96 (66.2)0.364
Fever (> 38.3°C)11 (42.3)44 (30.3)0.258
Shock (SBP < 90 mmHg)2 (7.7)15 (10.3)1.000
Acute kidney injury3 (11.5)13 (9.0)0.714
Albumin2.95 (2.62–3.17)2.90 (2.70–3.20)0.791
Hemoglobin A1c6.15 (5.80–6.60)5.9 (5.50–6.70)0.753
WBC count > 15 × 103/µL16 (61.5)37 (25.5)0.001
More advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)9 (34.6)23 (15.9)0.031
Recurrence of CDI6 (24.0)15 (10.9)0.099
In-hospital mortality3 (11.5)11 (7.6)0.450

Values are expressed as median (confidence interval 25%–75%) or number of patients (%).

CDI, Clostridium difficile infection; ICU, intensive care unit; GARD, gastric acid-reducing drug; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WBC, white blood cell; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Table 5.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis[a] of risk factors for treatment resistance (backward method)

VariableOdds ratio95% CIp value
Use of two or more antibiotics3.471.21–9.950.020
Vancomycin use5.641.11–28.520.036
WBC count > 15 × 103/µL4.111.61–10.500.003
More advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2)2.831.00–7.940.048

CI, confidence interval; WBC, white blood cell; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Included variables: use of two or more antibiotics, carbapenem use, vancomycin use, WBC count > 15 × 103/μL, and more advanced CKD.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we observed the following: (1) stage IV to V CKD not requiring dialysis, as well as ESRD requiring dialysis were independent risk factors for CDI, and ESRD patients on dialysis had a much higher risk for CDI; (2) more advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with higher in-hospital mortality due to CDI; and (3) patients who had treatment resistance showed significantly higher prevalences of previous use of two or more antibiotics, previous use of vancomycin, WBC count > 15 × 103/µL, and more advanced CKD. Risk factors for CDI include antibiotic use, older age, gastric acid suppression therapy, admission to a healthcare facility, immunosuppression, and prolonged hospitalization [1-5]. CKD has also been suggested to be a risk factor for CDI and is associated with increased mortality, lower treatment response, and higher recurrence rates [10,15-17]. Although the reason for the association between CDI and CKD is unclear, recent studies have shown that CKD is associated with systemic chronic inflammation and subsequent acquired immunodeficiency that leads to increased susceptibility to infection [18,19]. Furthermore, gastric acid suppression or microorganism overgrowth caused by intestinal dysmotility is frequently observed in CKD patients; this may also contribute to increased risk of CDI [12,13]. These results suggest that CKD could also be an important risk factor for CDI and affect its prognosis. However, it is not clear whether CKD not requiring dialysis is also a risk factor for CDI, because previous studies have yielded conflicting results [10,15,16]. Eddi et al. [10] reported that the association between CKD and CDI was insignificant in patients with stage III to V CKD who were not on dialysis, whereas in a study by Keddis et al. [15], CKD patients not on dialysis had a higher incidence of CDI than non-CKD patients (p < 0.001). Thus, in this study, we investigated the CDI risk factors according to the CKD stage and found that stage IV to V CKD not requiring dialysis and ESRD requiring dialysis were significant independent risk factors for CDI. Thus, we suggest that the recent increase in the occurrence of CDI may be due to the increasing number of people with CKD. Previous use of antibiotics is the most important cause of CDI. Almost all antibiotics can lead to the development of CDI, although second/third generation cephalosporins, clindamycin, and fluoroquinolones seem to play the most important role in its development [2,20]. In terms of CDI management, discontinuation of antibiotics that may cause CDI and initiating therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin according to CDI severity are recommended [21]. If there is no improvement in clinical symptoms after the initial therapy with metronidazole, switching to vancomycin or the addition of vancomycin is required. In our center, this clinical practice guideline is followed. In the analysis of the treatment response of CDI, we found that CKD was associated with poor clinical outcome among patients with CDI, similar to that in previous studies, showing that CKD patients have longer treatment periods [17] and higher in-hospital morbidity [15,16]. In this study, initial treatment resistance was more common in CKD patients. The in-hospital mortality rate was also significantly higher among patients with advanced CKD than in non-advanced CKD patients. These results suggest that careful management and follow-up of CDI is required, especially in CKD patients. In summary, more advanced CKD, with an eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 is a risk factor for CDI even in CKD patients not on dialysis. Additionally, advanced CKD is associated with poor clinical outcome of CDI, particularly with poor response to initial treatment and increased in-hospital mortality. Thus, in CKD patients, careful attention should be paid to the occurrence of CDI and its management to improve the outcome of CDI. Considering the recent changes in the epidemiology and clinical severity of CDI in Korea, further long-term prospective studies with larger sample sizes based on the CKD stage will be useful to assess the clinical impact of CKD on CDI. 1. Advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 is a risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) even in CKD patients not on dialysis. 2. Advanced CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) was associated with higher in-hospital mortality among patients with CDI. 3. Patients who had poor response to initial CDI treatment showed significantly higher prevalences of previous use of two or more antibiotics, previous use of vancomycin, white blood cell count > 15 × 103/μL, and more advanced CKD.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Authors:  T Monaghan; T Boswell; Y R Mahida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Recent insights into Clostridium difficile pathogenesis.

Authors:  Alex G Peniche; Tor C Savidge; Sara M Dann
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.915

3.  Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  L V McFarland; M E Mulligan; R Y Kwok; W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Gastric function in chronic renal failure. Effects of maintenance haemodialysis.

Authors:  J B McConnell; W K Stewart; B Thjodleifsson; K G Wormsley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Renal impairment and clinical outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in two randomized trials.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mullane; Oliver A Cornely; Derrick W Crook; Yoav Golan; Thomas J Louie; Mark A Miller; Michelle A Josephson; Sherwood L Gorbach
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.754

6.  Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Rodney Eddi; Mohammed N Malik; Rada Shakov; Walid J Baddoura; Chandra Chandran; Vincent A Debari
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  The intestinal microbiota, a leaky gut, and abnormal immunity in kidney disease.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Anders; Kirstin Andersen; Bärbel Stecher
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in uremic patients.

Authors:  B Aronsson; P Barany; C E Nord; B Nyström; P Stenvinkel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Khurshid Yousuf; Mohammad G Saklayen; Ronald J Markert; Christopher J Barde; Narasimh Gopalswamy
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 10.  Immune cell dysfunction and inflammation in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Michiel G H Betjes
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 28.314

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predictors of severe outcomes in patients with Clostridium difficile infection from a Hispanic population.

Authors:  Laura Paláu-Dávila; Elvira Garza-González; Eva María Gutiérrez-Delgado; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-17

Review 2.  Secondary Immunodeficiency Related to Kidney Disease (SIDKD)-Definition, Unmet Need, and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Stefanie Steiger; Jan Rossaint; Alexander Zarbock; Hans-Joachim Anders
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Clinical Determinants Predicting Clostridioides difficile Infection among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Łukasz Lis; Andrzej Konieczny; Michał Sroka; Anna Ciszewska; Kornelia Krakowska; Tomasz Gołębiowski; Zbigniew Hruby
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Assessment of Kidney Injury as a Severity Criteria for Clostridioides Difficile Infection.

Authors:  Travis J Carlson; Anne J Gonzales-Luna; Kimberly Nebo; Hannah Y Chan; Ngoc-Linh T Tran; Sheena Antony; Chris Lancaster; M Jahangir Alam; Khurshida Begum; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal complications in adult cancer patients: 2017 updated evidence-based guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO).

Authors:  M Schmidt-Hieber; J Bierwirth; D Buchheidt; O A Cornely; M Hentrich; G Maschmeyer; E Schalk; J J Vehreschild; Maria J G T Vehreschild
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 6.  Clostridium difficile Infection in Special High-Risk Populations.

Authors:  Alberto Cózar-Llistó; Antonio Ramos-Martinez; Javier Cobo
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2016-08-11

7.  Metronidazole therapy as initial treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with chronic kidney disease in Korea.

Authors:  Jaeuk Shin; Yu Mi Wi; Yu-Ji Lee
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Molecular Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Clostridium difficile ST81 Infection in a Teaching Hospital in Eastern China.

Authors:  Ziyu Yang; Qian Huang; Juanxiu Qin; Xiaoye Zhang; Ying Jian; Huiying Lv; Qian Liu; Min Li
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 9.  The clinical impact of gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  So Mi Kim; Il Han Song
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-A Novel Risk Factor for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Lara Šamadan; Mia Jeličić; Adriana Vince; Neven Papić
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.