Literature DB >> 33425775

Molecular Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Clostridium difficile ST81 Infection in a Teaching Hospital in Eastern China.

Ziyu Yang1, Qian Huang1, Juanxiu Qin1, Xiaoye Zhang2, Ying Jian1, Huiying Lv1, Qian Liu1, Min Li1.   

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of Clostridium difficile causes an increased morbidity and mortality of inpatients, especially in Europe and North America, while data on C. difficile infection (CDI) are limited in China.
Methods: From September 2014 to August 2019, 562 C. difficile isolates were collected from patients and screened for toxin genes. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and antimicrobial susceptibility tests by E-test and agar dilution method were performed. A case group composed of patients infected with sequence type (ST) 81 C. difficile was compared to the non-ST81 infection group and non CDI diarrhea patients for risk factor and outcome analyses.
Results: The incidence of inpatients with CDI was 7.06 cases per 10,000 patient-days. Of the 562 C. difficile isolates, ST81(22.78%) was the predominant clone over this period, followed by ST54 (11.21%), ST3 (9.61%), and ST2 (8.72%). Toxin genotype tcdA+tcdB+cdt- accounted for 50.18% of all strains, while 29.54% were tcdA-tcdB+cdt- genotypes. Overall, no isolate was resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin or daptomycin, and resistance rates to meropenem gradually decreased during these years. Although several metronidazole-resistant strains were isolated in this study, the MIC values decreased during this period. Resistance rates to moxifloxacin and clindamycin remained higher than those to the other antibiotics. Among CDI inpatients, longer hospitalization, usage of prednisolone, suffering from chronic kidney disease or connective tissue diseases and admission to emergency ward 2 or emergency ICU were significant risk factors for ST81 clone infection. All-cause mortality of these CDI patients was 4.92%(n=18), while the recurrent cases accounted for 5.74%(n=21). The 60-day mortality of ST81-CDI was significantly higher than non-ST81 infected group, while ST81 also accounted for most of the recurrent CDI cases.
Conclusion: This study revealed the molecular epidemiology and risk factors for the dominant C. difficile ST81 genotype infection in eastern China. Continuous and stringent surveillance on the emerging ST81 genotype needs to be initiated.
Copyright © 2020 Yang, Huang, Qin, Zhang, Jian, Lv, Liu and Li.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridium difficile infection; epidemiology; multilocus sequence typing; resistance; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 33425775      PMCID: PMC7785937          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.578098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


  57 in total

1.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  S B Debast; M P Bauer; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  The morbidity, mortality, and costs associated with Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Jennie H Kwon; Margaret A Olsen; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Molecular Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients in Eastern China.

Authors:  Dazhi Jin; Yun Luo; Chen Huang; Jian Cai; Julian Ye; Yi Zheng; Liqian Wang; Peng Zhao; Anbing Liu; Weijia Fang; Xianjun Wang; Shichang Xia; Jianmin Jiang; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe.

Authors:  E J Kuijper; B Coignard; P Tüll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Characterization of Clostridioides difficile isolates recovered from hospitalized patients and the hospitals environment and air: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Amir Aliramezani; Malihe Talebi; Farideh Golbabaei; Akram Baghani; Majid Marjani; Shirin Afhami; Mahbobeh Hajabdolbaghi; Mohammad Ali Boroumand; Ed J Kuijper; Masoumeh Douraghi
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Risk factors and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Hao-Yuan Lee; Hsuan-Ling Hsiao; Chin-Yuan Chia; Chun-Wen Cheng; Tzu-Cheng Tsai; Shin-Tarng Deng; Chyi-Liang Chen; Cheng-Hsun Chiu
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach.

Authors:  Alexandre P Francisco; Miguel Bugalho; Mário Ramirez; João A Carriço
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia.

Authors:  Deirdre A Collins; Peter M Hawkey; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  Nosocomial transmission of Clostridium difficile Genotype ST81 in a General Teaching Hospital in China traced by whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Juanxiu Qin; Yingxin Dai; Xiaowei Ma; Yanan Wang; Qianqian Gao; Huiying Lu; Tianming Li; Hongwei Meng; Qian Liu; Min Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Molecular Characterization of Clostridium difficile Isolates in China From 2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Xiao-Shu Liu; Wen-Ge Li; Wen-Zhu Zhang; Yuan Wu; Jin-Xing Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Complete Genome Sequencing and Comparative Phenotypic Analysis Reveal the Discrepancy Between Clostridioides difficile ST81 and ST37 Isolates.

Authors:  Tongxuan Su; Wei Chen; Daosheng Wang; Yingchao Cui; Qi Ni; Cen Jiang; Danfeng Dong; Yibing Peng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.