BACKGROUND: In this study, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was used to monitor the maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation to prove its role in predicting the prognosis of targeted therapy. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (IIIb-IV stage) were enrolled in the current study. They were positive for EGFR mutation. All patients received gefitinib (250 mg per day, administered orally). PET-CT was conducted prior to (at baseline) and six months after gefitinib administration for the lesion size and SUVmax. The recommendations of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were chosen for PET assessment. Metabolic response (SUV decline < -25%) was compared with morphologic response evaluated by CT scan and overall survival. RESULT: Compared to patients with △SUV% ≥ 25% (progressive metabolic disease), the survival time was significantly prolonged in △SUV% < -25% (including complete metabolic response and progressive metabolic disease) (10.6/18.4, P = 0.000), but was not in -25% ≤ △SUV% < 25% (stable metabolic disease) (10.6/10.7, P = 0.088). Patients who achieved △SUV% < -25% after treatment were associated with a longer median survival, higher control rate, and better prognosis. There was a strong correlation between SUV changes (△SUV%) and CT size change (△lesion size%) (R(2) = 0.891, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Changes in the SUV could be used to predict the prognosis of targeted therapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
BACKGROUND: In this study, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was used to monitor the maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) in advanced lung adenocarcinomapatients with epithermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation to prove its role in predicting the prognosis of targeted therapy. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (IIIb-IV stage) were enrolled in the current study. They were positive for EGFR mutation. All patients received gefitinib (250 mg per day, administered orally). PET-CT was conducted prior to (at baseline) and six months after gefitinib administration for the lesion size and SUVmax. The recommendations of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were chosen for PET assessment. Metabolic response (SUV decline < -25%) was compared with morphologic response evaluated by CT scan and overall survival. RESULT: Compared to patients with △SUV% ≥ 25% (progressive metabolic disease), the survival time was significantly prolonged in △SUV% < -25% (including complete metabolic response and progressive metabolic disease) (10.6/18.4, P = 0.000), but was not in -25% ≤ △SUV% < 25% (stable metabolic disease) (10.6/10.7, P = 0.088). Patients who achieved △SUV% < -25% after treatment were associated with a longer median survival, higher control rate, and better prognosis. There was a strong correlation between SUV changes (△SUV%) and CT size change (△lesion size%) (R(2) = 0.891, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Changes in the SUV could be used to predict the prognosis of targeted therapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Authors: David G Pfister; David H Johnson; Christopher G Azzoli; William Sause; Thomas J Smith; Sherman Baker; Jemi Olak; Diane Stover; John R Strawn; Andrew T Turrisi; Mark R Somerfield Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-12-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ji-Youn Han; Keunchil Park; Sang-We Kim; Dae Ho Lee; Hyae Young Kim; Heung Tae Kim; Myung Ju Ahn; Tak Yun; Jin Seok Ahn; Cheolwon Suh; Jung-Shin Lee; Sung Jin Yoon; Jong Hee Han; Jae Won Lee; Sook Jung Jo; Jin Soo Lee Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: O S Breathnach; B Freidlin; B Conley; M R Green; D H Johnson; D R Gandara; M O'Connell; F A Shepherd; B E Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Claude Nahmias; Wahid T Hanna; Lindi M Wahl; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Townsend Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hua Bai; Li Mao; Hang Shu Wang; Jun Zhao; Lu Yang; Tong Tong An; Xin Wang; Chun Jian Duan; Na Mei Wu; Zhi Qing Guo; Yi Xu Liu; Hong Ning Liu; Ye Yu Wang; Jie Wang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edward S Kim; Vera Hirsh; Tony Mok; Mark A Socinski; Radj Gervais; Yi-Long Wu; Long-Yun Li; Claire L Watkins; Mark V Sellers; Elizabeth S Lowe; Yan Sun; Mei-Lin Liao; Kell Osterlind; Martin Reck; Alison A Armour; Frances A Shepherd; Scott M Lippman; Jean-Yves Douillard Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321